EasyJet Admits Data of Nine Million Hacked (bbc.com) 23
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC: EasyJet has admitted that a "highly sophisticated cyber-attack" has affected approximately nine million customers. It said email addresses and travel details had been stolen and that 2,208 customers had also had their credit card details "accessed". The firm has informed the UK's Information Commissioner's Office while it investigates the breach. EasyJet first became aware of the attack in January. It told the BBC that it was only able to notify customers whose credit card details were stolen in early April. Stolen credit card data included the three digital security code -- known as the CVV number -- on the back of the card itself. EasyJet added that it had gone public now in order to warn the nine million customers whose email addresses had been stolen to be wary of phishing attacks. It said that it would notify everyone affected by 26 May.
CVV? (Score:5, Informative)
I thought retailers aren't supposed to save the security code?
Re: (Score:2)
I'm surprised the credit card companies don't sue anyone who does into the ground. They're liable for losses, and it's pretty obvious if you saved the CVV when you weren't supposed to.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:CVV? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
EasyJet likes to keep your card on file because it reduces friction when charging for extras. Everything they aren't legally obliged to give you costs extra and the whole experience is designed to push you towards paying more than the headline ticket price.
Re: (Score:2)
Everything they aren't legally obliged to give you costs extra and the whole experience is designed to push you towards paying more than the headline ticket price.
That's because that's where they make their profit. They make very little on the price of the ticket itself.
Re:CVV? (Score:5, Insightful)
9 million customer records and only 2200 credit cards. CVV was likely in flight, not saved.
again and again? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Yes, check and untaint all your inputs before you use them and use parametrized queries, you "fullstack" hero.
Re: again and again? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Hello, full-stack hero. Apt username, congrats.
Re: (Score:2)
A witless insult on slashdot? I'm shocked!
Apparently the concept that companies pay other companies for things so that they don't have to do them has come as a shock to you. Don't worry, you'll get used to it.
Re: (Score:2)
And yet, QL injection is the single most important vector of "database hacks", bar none, and it is still happening decades after parametric queries became available through sheer code monkey ignorance.
Re: again and again? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Homer Software (Score:2)
Just when you thought it was safe to fly!
highly sophisticated cyber-attack (Score:2)
"Highly sophisticated attack" = "we dumb" (Score:2)
That phrase is code for "we made several really dumb beginner's mistakes but do not want to admit that". It is high time that when something like this happens, the CEO goes to prison. I would also think an automatic compensation of $1000 for each person affected (unless they can demonstrate higher damage) would be a good idea. Maybe these two things could stop the atrociously bad and utterly pathetic amateur level IT operations that are going on in far too many companies.
EasyJet target of highly sophisticated attack? (Score:2)
Clarke Reference? (Score:2)
The Nine Million Names of "Oh my God"!