Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Security Government Politics

Microsoft Reveals First Known Midterm Campaign Hacking Attempts (politico.com) 163

An anonymous reader shares a report: Microsoft detected and helped block hacking attempts against three congressional candidates this year, a company executive said Thursday, marking the first known example of cyber interference in the midterm elections. "Earlier this year, we did discover that a fake Microsoft domain had been established as the landing page for phishing attacks," said Tom Burt, Microsoft's vice president for security and trust, at the Aspen Security Forum. "And we saw metadata that suggested those phishing attacks were being directed at three candidates who are all standing for election in the midterm elections."

Burt declined to name the targets but said they were "people who, because of their positions, might have been interesting targets from an espionage standpoint as well as an election disruption standpoint." Microsoft took down the fake domain and worked with the federal government to block the phishing messages.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Microsoft Reveals First Known Midterm Campaign Hacking Attempts

Comments Filter:
  • But... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by TFlan91 ( 2615727 ) on Thursday July 19, 2018 @02:52PM (#56975838)

    But Trump said they weren't hacking us..............

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Its not them, its us - Canada, you hosers.
      Oh, and sorry.... Eh.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Yeah why did Obama do nothing about this? He knew about it and it still happened.

      • And what is Trump doing about it?

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          by Anonymous Coward

          Not going into a war because of it? USA trying to whine about Russia engaging in subversion like any rational competing government does, and much like USA does whenever there's Russian elections, is hilarious considering USA's own fucked up meddling in world governments, one of which lead to the emergence of a fundamentalist Iran that would never happen had USA never been involved in fucking up the Iranian people during and after Mosaddegh. Another fine historical meddling is USA putting Saddam into office

          • Remember the result of the First Free Elections in Iraq, after deposing Saddam?

            The Iraqi Nation voted. They choose a major religious fundamentalist choice, in genuine, free, honest elections. Then USA decided they didn't like their choice, dismissed the result of the elections and set up a government of their own.

            There's a rather lengthy list [wikipedia.org] of cases where USA was sticking their fingers into foreign government choices.

            Panama. Guatemala. Bolivia. Afghanistan. Nicaragua.

            The hypocrisy is staggering.

      • Re: But... (Score:5, Informative)

        by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 ) on Thursday July 19, 2018 @04:11PM (#56976342)

        Yeah why did Obama do nothing about this? He knew about it and it still happened.

        He attempted to do something about it... unfortunately it failed.

        Obama tried to warn off Putin (as if that would work by itself). He then went to congressional leadership, trying to establish some sort of bipartisan response - but was rebuffed.

        Now, after that failed, I think he should’ve still done something - even if it were just a televised address to the nation. Frankly, I do think he dropped the ball - and badly. But pretending he just sat on the knowledge is ignoring the facts - fake news, as it were.

        • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

          by Anonymous Coward

          He also introduced sanctions against Russia.

          I'm not sure anything he said in public would have made a difference. Nothing he would have said would have convinced anybody who wasn't already convenced. Thus, the only reason for him to say something would be so that later (about now) he could say "I told you so". He never was that kind of guy, and I like that in him.

          • I'm not sure anything he said in public would have made a difference.

            At a minimum, it would've altered the US national dialog on the subject to some degree.

            • I'm guessing that the dialog would have been altered to Obama meddling in the election to support Hillary by making up Russian collusion to hurt Trump.

              • I'm guessing that the dialog would have been altered to Obama meddling in the election to support Hillary by making up Russian collusion to hurt Trump.

                Absolutely. That's exactly what would have happened. And everyone involved knew it.

          • So was him telling Romney the 80s want their foreign policy back his way of doing stuff? What a farce.
        • Obama could have done more but at the time he thought HRC was a shoo-in and if he got involved the Trump supporters would cry foul when he lost. If you want to blame anybody, blame Nate Silver.
        • "even if it were just a televised address to the nation"
          And the next day he would have been impeached for attempting to manipulate the election.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Don't worry. Change the subject to voter IDs and suddenly both sides will change their tune on whether our votes are our votes...

    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward

      He said they didn't hack the elections. Election day is different than campaigns. But anyway I get phishing mails spam all day long. I would hardly categorize that as hacking.

    • Well Obama did say no serious person thinks they are.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Trump was the only one saying the election was going to be hacked during the election.
      Hillary, the DNC and CNN were all saying it couldn't happen.
      After Trump won, suddenly it was Russian hacking 24/7.

      • by gosand ( 234100 ) on Thursday July 19, 2018 @04:31PM (#56976486)

        Trump was the only one saying the election was going to be hacked during the election.
        Hillary, the DNC and CNN were all saying it couldn't happen.
        After Trump won, suddenly it was Russian hacking 24/7.

        After Trump won, suddenly he does an about face and says there was no meddling in the election.

        One side changed their stance based on evidence. Well... I guess they both did.

        Trump is the president, election meddling or not. Please STOP talking about Hilary and the DNC. It's past, gone, they lost.
        It has nothing to do with them anymore. All that matters now is how our president handles things. Which is embarassing.

        • The DNC still matters because they are still shitting on democracy. They are still refusing to support actual leftist candidates, and still attacking the ones that manage to get on a ballot (like ocasio Cortez)

          If we are to make progress as a nation, we need to repair or replace the DNC.

    • 1. Who? TFA doesn't identify the attackers in any way.

      2. Whom? TFA doesn't mention affiliation of the candidates.

      Supposedly your side is against stereotyping, jumping to conclusions and presuming guilt basing on nationality/ethnicity?

  • why is windows on a voteing system?

    • do you mean why is a voting system on windows? that is not what was reported. garden variety phishing with a landing domain that looks like Microsoft. has nothing to do with a voting system.
  • by RyanFenton ( 230700 ) on Thursday July 19, 2018 @02:59PM (#56975866)

    As the electorate that pursues their greed and cruelty to such a degree, that they would throw away the any pretense of defending democracy in the face of open attack.

    That's like 42% of likely voters.

    What happened to America. I'm not a democrat myself - I'm just amazed that this is what conservatism has allowed itself to become. Beyond any ideals, just driven by cruelty to hurting the other side, at all costs.

    Ryan Fenton

    • by Sponge Bath ( 413667 ) on Thursday July 19, 2018 @03:06PM (#56975910)
      Republicans are conservative in the same way Putin is communist.
      • >>Republicans are conservative in the same way Putin is communist.

        True - but all the institutions of conservative power are WORSE at every point of consideration. Talk radio conservatives, internet conservatives - every place with a passion for conservatism is pushing right in line with Trump.

        The problem isn't republicans - they're being carved up and reshaped by conservatism itself in the US.

        It's not a team vs. team thing - it's a definite corruption in what conservatism means here.

        Ryan Fenton

        • by gDLL ( 1413289 )
          and what would you have them do ? Get eviscerated by the MSM holy inquisition ? Perfect is the enemy of good. But of course there is one current of thought that dreams of utopias all day long, and it's not conservatism.
          • "and what would you have them do ? "

            Stop making so much stuff up and represent the people a little more, and themselves and big business a lot less, same as for the democrats.

            • Are your Congressmen representing you and your interests? Mine seem to be doing okay. Not great. Nothing to be upset about.

        • True - but all the institutions of conservative power are WORSE at every point of consideration. Talk radio conservatives, internet conservatives - every place with a passion for conservatism is pushing right in line with Trump.

          Because they've decided that their ends justify the means ...

        • It's not a team vs. team thing

          Yes it is. If you don't think that nearly everyone takes part in "their" team then you are naive. People push the team thing even if they are completely ignorant of a subject. Maybe they are accidentally correct but people are more concerned about signaling to their "teammates" than finding truth. This has become more common place.

          pushing right in line with Trump.

          Could it be that people can view the same thing and come to a different conclusion? This whole Helsinki outrage is a good example. I am really confused on what Trump was supposed

        • The thing about being conservative is that it all comes down to, what are you trying to conserve? Conserve is one of those words that doesn't really stand on it's own, to protect something but what? We all know what it means to conserve and we each have our own view of what is important and needs to be protected. To simply call someone conservative says nothing except that there is something that they want to protect.

        • by jedidiah ( 1196 ) on Thursday July 19, 2018 @06:09PM (#56977020) Homepage

          > Talk radio conservatives, internet conservatives - every place with a passion for conservatism is pushing right in line with Trump.

          So you've never actually paid any attention to any of that stuff then.

          Conservatives are not nearly the mindless hive mind that liberals are. Talking heads even from the same outlet can have different points of view. Conservatives have a bigger tent (than liberals) these days.

          Considering what nonsense "liberals" have been latching onto lately, it's not really that hard to be considered a heretic by them.

          • Yesterday I had an interesting discussion with a Liberal.

            "The figure of 4.5% of people working two jobs seem way low."

            "Politifact claims it's correct! [link]"

            "Politifact lies here. It cites a specific study and picks out one single figure: people who work exactly one full-time job and one part-time job. There are people who work two jobs in different configurations. Two full-time jobs, three part-time jobs, etc. It's all in [the study] linked by Politifact."

            " "Politifact lies here. Don't believe ANYTHING. T

    • by nnet ( 20306 )
      See? Who said a two party system isn't working :)
    • by Rick Schumann ( 4662797 ) on Thursday July 19, 2018 @04:50PM (#56976618) Journal
      Friend, I have some Bad News for you, an epiphany I had some time ago: The America we all grew up thinking we were living in? IT NEVER EXISTED IN THE FIRST PLACE. Maybe it did for the first few months or years in the 18th century, but after that it started getting subverted by the greedy and the cruel, as you put it. Long before the time we were born, it was already gone.

      Let me tell you what is at least as big a threat, if not more so, than the foreign agents who are meddling in our electoral process: malicious natural U.S. citizens who are only really interested in 'pissing off liberals', and they don't care if they destroy the United States in the process, so long as they get their pound of flesh. CBS News conducted a poll [cbsnews.com] that shows that even in the wake of Trump virtually selling out the U.S. Government to Vladimir Putin -- a shameful debacle that both sides of the Congressional aisle universally condemned -- Republicans are still supporting Trump. Even Congressional Republicans won't criticize him for long, because they're more interested in retaining their majority in Congress than they're interested in what's good for the entire country, so they let this train wreck of an Administration continue, even as Trump makes nice with one of the biggest villians on the planet today, an unmistakable enemy of the United States. That's why everything is so bad, that's why it all so completely fucked up, and until the GOP no longer has a majority in at least the House or the Senate it'll all just get worse and worse as time goes by. By 2020 there may not be much of a country left.
      • "The America we all grew up thinking we were living in? IT NEVER EXISTED IN THE FIRST PLACE. Maybe it did for the first few months or years in the 18th century,"

        You mean when we had slavery and women couldn't vote? Yeah, paradise right?

    • What "attack"? $100K in Facebook ads that primarily contained existing democratic talking points (gun control, BLM, etc), and that even the tainted Mueller investigation can't prove affected anything at all? The only thing they managed to do is sow division and boost identity politics, but as the past 2 years have shown, the Democratic party excels at that even without any Russian help.

      I mean the US State Dept _re-elected Yeltsin_ in Russia, and done so openly, in broad daylight. They've also funneled money

  • It isn't not unfake news... or something. NO COLLUSION!
  • create misleading domain, send phishes, catch morons ("...I don't know them, I wasn't expecting an attachment, I think i'll open it!..."), infect machines, repeat.
  • are there ANY IT people as early commenters on threads here? or are there too many non IT people in here who simply don't know what sysadmins face day to day?

    come on now - Hacking 'news' is the latest Red Scare.

    *sigh*

  • A fake domain for phishing is not a campaign hacking attempt.
  • Comment removed based on user account deletion

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?

Working...