Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft IT

LinkedIn Promises To Bring Order and Meaning To Your Useless Endorsements (qz.com) 48

Oliver Staley, reporting for Quartz: LinkedIn's endorsement feature has never felt like the most trustworthy of sources. Rather than a panel of star witnesses who can honestly vouch for you, it more often seems like a random assortment of friends, acquaintances, and opportunists hoping for an endorsement in return. LinkedIn has recognized the problem and is trying to address it by creating a hierarchy of endorsers. Instead of all your endorsements having equal weight, the site will highlight people who might actually have some claim on knowing you, such as former colleagues and classmates, or who have credibility in the field. The goal is to make the feature more like the real world, where you ask for recommendations from people you trust or are in a position to know, says Hari Srinivasan, head of the LinkedIn team developing the feature. "If you want to find a good designer, you ask other good designers," he said.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

LinkedIn Promises To Bring Order and Meaning To Your Useless Endorsements

Comments Filter:
  • by QuietLagoon ( 813062 ) on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @02:12PM (#53109083)
    With Microsoft using Windows 10 to harvest data from my PC (emails, web browsing, etc), and Microsoft owning LinkedIn's data ... well, I've already have started to drastically reduce what I have on LinkedIn.
    • Re: (Score:1, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward

      I created a LinkedIn profile in 2008, when I lost my last tech job. Initially, it was okay, but after I became a recruiter, the experience went downhill.

      For starters, LinkedIn refused to let me have multiple profiles, stating that it violated their terms of service. I wanted to keep my old profile, but also open a new one for my recruiter profile. Reason? In my old profile, I had links to my actual colleagues, and was limited to them and a few recruiters who I thought at the time might help with findi

      • The endorsements, by contrast, are done by people who have no clue about what you do.

        I get these all the time. I never give them out, as it feels like I'm be compelled to. So long as I never do it, the excuse of "I barely use Linkedin." works for any time anyone asks me why I never endorse them.

        But no one's ever asked. It's a pointless exercise, meaningless to the nth degree, and no one cares.

    • by Gr8Apes ( 679165 )

      With Microsoft using Windows 10 to harvest data from my PC (emails, web browsing, etc), and Microsoft owning LinkedIn's data ... well, I've already have started to drastically reduce what I have on LinkedIn.

      You're too late - LinkedIn is similar to a public billboard. You shouldn't have anything on it you wouldn't post on a billboard facing a major interstate in a downtown metropolis.

    • well, I've already have started to drastically reduce what I have on LinkedIn

      If you were worried about some company or people using the information you put up on LinkedIn.... you were using it wrong.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Wtf?

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Slashvertisement!

    • Counterpoint... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by pr0t0 ( 216378 ) on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @02:27PM (#53109183)

      A few years ago, I got a network request from the college-bound daughter of a client of mine. I thought, "Oh that's nice. She's starting early to build her professional network." So I clicked the acknowledgement. I then got a message stating something like, "Great! We'll notify her that you are interested in joining her network!"

      I don't know if that was the exact wording, but the message made think there was an AI at work trying to make connections on behalf of the girl, and that because I responded, it would send my request to her out of nowhere. So she's 18 and I'm 40, and now I look like some kind of creepy stalker.

      I haven't used LinkedIn since that day. It's just as well. I see little value in the site. To me, it's just a tool for head-hunting companies to spam me with requests to hire me or help the recruiter find someone who has my skill set and qualifications. Yeah, I'll get right on that.

      • A few years ago, I got a network request from the college-bound daughter of a client of mine. I thought, "Oh that's nice. She's starting early to build her professional network." So I clicked the acknowledgement. I then got a message stating something like, "Great! We'll notify her that you are interested in joining her network!"...

        That happened to me. Once. Then I was on to LinkedIn's egregious tactics. It is when I started to become suspicious of LinkedIn and what they were using my data for. Now that Microsoft (and Windows 10 data harvesting) owns LinkedIn, there is no way I'm going to increase my involvement there. Indeed, as I mentioned earlier, I'm decreasing my involvement.

      • Re:Counterpoint... (Score:5, Informative)

        by ShanghaiBill ( 739463 ) on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @03:19PM (#53109521)

        I have also been "tricked" into making unsolicited connections, thinking the other party had initiated it.

        When I first created my LinkedIn account, they asked for my Yahoo and Gmail email addresses, and then ASKED FOR THE PASSWORDS. I saw no reason to provide that information, but my wife fell for it, and LinkedIn then, without her permission, logged into her accounts and sent a link request to every single person in her contact list, consisting of over 3000 people, many of whom she barely knew and hadn't heard from in years. Each email was phrased to imply that she was personally requesting the connection.

        LinkedIn was a very sleazy company. They should fit right in at Microsoft.

      • Re:Counterpoint... (Score:5, Interesting)

        by war4peace ( 1628283 ) on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @03:44PM (#53109653)

        That's why I never accept any requests unless they are accompanied by non-generic invite text. Also, once accepted, they have two weeks to send me a message, otherwise they're removed from my network.
        Many recruiters added me, only to be removed after two weeks because they never wrote me anything. i'm not going to become one of the 10K contacts they boatd having.

  • by luvirini ( 753157 ) on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @02:35PM (#53109225)

    As Linked in seems mostly to be a spamming site of useless contacts. They would lose a lot of the so called "value" if they stopped the stupid spamming and only linked people to actual people they interact with as people could see how empty things are in reality.

  • by steveo777 ( 183629 ) on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @02:35PM (#53109229) Homepage Journal

    I always loved Endorsement Roulette on LinkedIn. I only log in every month or so (if I'm not actively pursuing something) and nothing beats seeing that real estate agent you never actually hired endorsing me for Python Development and CPU Design. I'm reasonably certain I never discussed either of these with that dude, because at the time I wasn't heavily into Python... and Intel keeps telling me that nobody needs a CPU made out of reconstituted coffee grounds.

    • by aicrules ( 819392 ) on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @02:58PM (#53109391)
      On the other side of the coin, I find joy in endorsing my friends in the most random weird things I can find in LinkedIn's pre-built list of endorsements. Did it enough that LinkedIn temporarily suspended my ability to endorse...if only one friend had accepted the "Breastfeeding" endorsement.
      • I had someone endorse me for a software package from a competitor. Not just any old software, one in which our companies got in a bitter lawsuit over, and everyone from my company is forbidden to even visit the website for. (No joke, if they notice too much traffic to that company's website, the whole company gets a nastygram.) So yeah, I wouldn't mind a way to add some credibility to the endorsements.

        And of course I have the slew of endorsements that I am not qualified for from friends and other people
    • I especially like it when someone only marginally associated with me gives me an endorsement for a skill I do not possess. "Oh, yeah, he's a computer guy - I'll endorse him for PC Repair and Excel Pivot Tables".

      Okay, technically I can repair a PC. And I certainly could figure out pivot tables if I had a reason for doing so. But even so, I really wouldn't those to be listed as part of my professional skill set - I'd rather work at Jimmy Johns than do either one.

      Maybe a better example is my recent endorsement

  • by Oswald McWeany ( 2428506 ) on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @03:03PM (#53109415)

    Need a Slashdot moderation type system for Linked In.

    Bob from accounting, +1 Insightful
    Julie from Veridian Dynamics, -1 floozie
    Greg from Acme weapons, -1 racist

    Darn, I've run out of moderation points to mod Sally.

  • JOIN me (on LinkedIn), and I will COMPLETE your training. With our combined strength, we can end this destructive conflict, and bring ORDER and MEANING To your USELESS ENDORSEMENTS!

  • Word of advice - DO NOT accept invites from any recruitment firm or agency. They'll do some dumb search for a skill on a word like "java" and spam every result without mercy. Doesn't matter if you expressed any interest in the job, or even if it's in the same country as you. If you have more than one link to agents you can enjoy multiple spams about the same job. Unlink and make them use one of their precious inmails to make contact. At least then it shows a modicum of effort. My advice is to ignore that to
  • People seem to endorse me for things and they have no background in it. If you are going to endorse me for a skill, you should have that skill set in your linkedin profile. Your endorsement becomes more valuable when the people who endorse you also rise in the esteem of others. Ultimately, there needs to be a metric on skills by some unaffiliated power or weighting system.. (preferably, not stuff like certification training)
  • I had one person connect with me. They were generic enough I though I may have worked with them so I added them. They then use my link to a high profile person I know to contact them. That person got back to me to check what I knew about him. Having a closer look at his profile I realised it had no verifiable information. For example there was not a single employer named, just names such as "Radio Module company". He claims to hold a degree at the "University of Reading" but when I contacted that universi
  • by paiute ( 550198 )
    Now my contacts will begin to question the heart surgery endorsement from my cousin's babysitter's neighbor.
  • by dcavanaugh ( 248349 ) on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @05:32PM (#53110359) Homepage

    I have written 100% truthful, positive recommendations for some really good people. And some of those people have written 100% truthful, positive recommendations for me. But in the competitive marketplace, the value of this information is lost as truthful stories are diluted into an ocean of fiction.

    The only thing LinkedIn is good for is entertainment. It's fun to visit the profile of known underachievers, just to see who is writing "quid pro quo" recommendations. I have seen stories about accomplishments that never happened, touting various achievements for projects that were spectacular failures.

    And all of this is on top of imaginary degrees, fictional job titles at imaginary companies, or sometimes inflated job titles at real companies. Fact-checking this stuff is tougher than it looks. Most employers have a strict "no comment" policy regarding ex-employees. And then there are all the companies (and even colleges) that no longer exist. Even if a person can produce a reference to vouch for their story, it may turn out to be a case of one liar validating another. Background checks are definitely not working. I know of some people with fictional LinkedIn profiles, and somehow they bounce from one employer to the next with impunity.

  • .. it was going to be called "Circle-Jerk", but the domain was taken.

Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker

Working...