Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Security Bitcoin Government Privacy United States

No One's Bidding on The Shadow Brokers' Stolen NSA Hacking Tools ( 51

That group auctioning the NSA's hacking tools is "very upset" no one's bidding on them. An anonymous Slashdot reader quotes Motherboard: "TheShadowBrokers" authored another bizarre rant expressing their annoyance at the seeming lack of interest in ponying up bitcoins to release their full set of stolen files. "Peoples is having interest in free files ... But people is no interest in #EQGRP_Auction," the mysterious hacker group complained in a ranting post on Medium, which seems to be purposely written in Borat-style broken English. "TheShadowBrokers is thinking this is information communication problem."

The message also blindly lashes out at hackers, foreign intelligence services, and basically anyone else who hasn't bid on the files... At the time of this writing, TheShadowBrokers have only received bids for a total of 1.76 bitcoins -- or about $1,082 -- far below the group's asking price of $1 million.

At least five transactions came from a prankster who was trying to Rickroll the group with bitcoin addresses containing the words "Never Gonna Give You Up."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

No One's Bidding on The Shadow Brokers' Stolen NSA Hacking Tools

Comments Filter:
  • In other words (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Dunbal ( 464142 ) * on Sunday October 02, 2016 @05:43PM (#53000873)
    FBI upset that no one is going for the honey-pot.
  • by Mister Transistor ( 259842 ) on Sunday October 02, 2016 @06:00PM (#53000931) Journal

    This is great, I hope this happens more often. Maybe these shitbags will stop bothering to mine/phish/malware/etc. for identities and data once they find out they don't have the wealth of Croesus on their hands and no one wants to pay for it.

    • ... no one wants to pay for it.

      It's possible no one wants to put a target on their back.

    • You got it wrong: the shitbags here are NSA, yet somehow they go unpunished. I have far less scorn for criminals who hurt criminals than for taxpayer-funded officers gone rogue.

    • Re:Good! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by HBI ( 604924 ) on Sunday October 02, 2016 @06:19PM (#53000985) Journal

      nope. Making it an open auction was not the brightest of moves if you wanted a advertises the shelf life of your information too honestly, and lets people watch who pays. Anyone who might have been tempted to pay a lot for it...isn't going to do it this way.

      I suspect we are supposed to think that this is just someone who didn't know how to market it properly. I doubt that. Someone is embarrassing, provoking, or lulling someone into a false sense of security, and had an interest in making it as public as possible. The Borat note seems to support that thesis.

  • Rickroll (Score:4, Interesting)

    by CODiNE ( 27417 ) on Sunday October 02, 2016 @07:08PM (#53001169) Homepage

    I'm not familiar with bitcoin address generation. Can someone estimate the amount of computing power required to come up with those wallet addresses? Is this just a quick script that takes a minute at most or something like a hash collusion?

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Check the link, each address starts with 1$n where n is a single word of the song. These are wallet addresses.

      He probably used exactly this guide [] followed it to the letter, or number 1 in this case.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    They're not asking for $1 million -- they are asking for 1 million BTC. 1 million BTC is roughly $600 million. It's also ~1/15th of all bitcoins in existence. Trying to acquire that many bitcoins on the open market would send the price to Jupiter. It would be way, way, way over $600 million when all was said and done. My guess is that the Shadow Brokers know this well, and have something other than bitcoin remuneration in mind as an endgame.

  • Something is worth what someone is willing to pay. That's all.

    For something like this, if one group stole it, then another group can also steal it and not pay a dime. You can't sell something if your buyer can obtain it for free. Why would they pay? Makes no sense.

    Anyway, I would not want anything to do with this stuff. Somebody ELSE can find out if it's a honey pot and somebody ELSE can stick their finger up the NSA's butt hole and make them mad. Making the NSA mad at you is not a game.

  • Everyone likes heros, no one likes criminals.

    - If you free & release these files into the general public, you are a - and my - hero.
    - If you extort these files for a fee, you are just a criminal.

    It is simple as that.

    And the "non-interested" people seem not to be dumb:

    No refunds .. paying for something that you most likely won't get. Hahahahahahahha .. and they call it crowd funding .. ok crowdfunding sounds like that, but if a crowd funds something the funding crowd gets a piece.
    Or nobody gets a piece a

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Why would anyone "bid" when the "bid" amount is unconditionally given to the auctioneer for all participants in the auction?! This is especially bad given that there is no assurance that the auctioneers will actually hand over the goods to anyone. Also, the auctioneers could hand over the goods to multiple parties, perhaps offering the goods for sale elsewhere. And the auctioneers themselves can make use of the technology. And, depending on the nature of the tools, the auctioneers might even have the ab

  • Let's play pretend for a moment and say that this ain't a honeypot.

    First, the "samples" released were crappy. Really crappy. A few router security holes, few of them unknown in the relevant circles. Nobody who could pay for that would.

    Then there's the fact that you're fully dependent on the word of criminals. First, that they deliver in the first place, and second, that they only deliver to you. That's two things nobody in their right mind would put his money on.

  • they are already valueless because once stolen/leaked the exploits immediately become common knowledge so will be defended against.

    Presuming the NSA has at least half a braincell, you can bet they will have already totally defused the situation by telling all the appropriate manufacturers about any/all loopholes all the stolen tools exploited.

Matter cannot be created or destroyed, nor can it be returned without a receipt.