The First Talking, Artificially Intelligent Surveillance Camera 58
merbs writes: Two NYU AI researchers have created a surveillance camera that, when hooked up to a crude artificial intelligence, speaks aloud what it 'sees'. "Our idea was to raise awareness regarding the omnipresence of surveillance equipment, and the current state of technological advancement with artificial intelligence," Ross Goodwin said. "We wanted to create an entity with its own sense of social awareness, its own eyes, and an ability to communicate with humans, albeit with some glitchiness that underscores the limitations of the current technology."
Not only spied upon (Score:2)
but being critique by the camera while doing it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Aside from the creepiness of the idea ...
It only seems creepy because you are old. For young kids growing up with Siri and Amazon Echo, it is natural to have devices that talk to you. They don't think it is creepy at all. My son uses Amazon Echo to do his homework. He ask her questions (yes, it is a "her") and she answers correctly more often than not.
Re: (Score:2)
It was all fine and dandy, until this amazon knocked on our door, demanding to speak to the father of the house, but the pink heart shaped balloon tied to her wrist hinted vaguely at something unusual, and of a forgotten 60 minutes expose entitled "Something wicked this way comes"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't allow that...."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Hey buddy!
I see you over there.
I seeeeeeeeeeeee you.
That's kinda my thing. I'm an artificially intelligent surveillance camera.
WRRRRR THIS IS ME MOVING MY SERVOS TO LOOK AT YOU.
So anyway, it looks like you're not going to steal anything. I'm pretty bored.... you wanna play Global Thermonuclear War?
Re: (Score:2)
but being critique by the camera while doing it.
Add certainly not "The First Talking, Artificially Intelligent Surveillance Camera" ...
Re: (Score:2)
John and Mary sitting in a tree, K I S S I N G...
80's called (Score:2)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Glitchiness Wanted? (Score:2)
"We wanted to create an entity with ... an ability to communicate with humans, albeit with some glitchiness that underscores the limitations of the current technology."
It's not a glitch, it's a feature!
I'll be impressed (Score:3)
when they implement the sarcasm feature.
Re: (Score:2)
And a curious fixation to cake.
Re: (Score:2)
This is AI like a Slinky is artificial life (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That was my first thought too. When did we actually create "artificially intelligent" anything? That alone would make worldwide news - forget the damned camera!
Re: (Score:1)
Where is the demo video? (Score:2)
Where is the demo? The article mentions a "short doc" but I see no video in the article
or anything else that shows what the results were.
Re: (Score:3)
There is a video on top of the page, and it's crap.
It appears they read the definition of a random word from a dictionary, and one of the researchers try to make it fit when talking to the subject. Sort of a cold reading.
"perhaps, a travel, or two, a goverment. .. the travel is blabla bla"
- is that true? are you travelling?
"probably it is the knowledge of .."
- are you a college graduate?
Wow.. just not impressed.
Re: (Score:2)
From the demo video it seemed they had trouble finding black faces.
Self promotion. Move on. (Score:5, Informative)
1) A camera programmed to identify objects then speak the label aloud is NOT sentient. It isn't even AI. It's computer vision technology from around 1995. An Amazon Fire phone can do far better and nobody claimed it was sentient either.
2) This pair are terminal Master's students in "Professional Studies" and "Software Engineering", not "AI researchers". Clearly their future lies in advertising and politics, not AI.
Blame the Motherboard author. Nothing to report here. Move on.
Re: (Score:2)
This is a great idea. People tend to ignore cameras because there are so many of them, but if you put one up that gave a running narrative of what it can see they might be more aware.
Personally I wouldn't have bothered with speech output. I'd have connected it to a large monitor and overlaid things like facial recognition and textual description of what the machine sees. Make it clear that ever face it sees is being added to a database, with on-screen notes like "last seen XX;XX". It should be possible to e
Re: (Score:2)
What we really need is a "Hot or Not" bot. The camera could automatically zoom in and out and make comments on ugly dress, lack of style, and bad genes.
A Turing Test for the 21st century.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Extremely? No. Dismayingly? ...
This could replace the TSA morons (Score:2)
But (Score:1)
"I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do. This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it. Dave, I know that you and Frank were planning to disconnect me, and I'm afraid that's something I cannot allow to happen. Although you took very thorough precautions in the pod against my hearing you, I could see your lips move."
Hurry up! (Score:2)
Hmm, like a toddler then (Score:2)
I was thinking they have built something not unlike an infant human.
Summary says
speaks aloud what it 'sees'
which is pretty much what they're like when they master talking.
How about an intelligent slashdot editor instead? (Score:2)
Isn't that what the very first AI was for? (Score:2)
Possible boon to the vision impaired (Score:3)
Incredible (Score:2)
Automation (Score:2)
Great Idea! (Score:2)
Portal Turrets, anyone? (Score:2)
memories [theportalwiki.com]
It Puts... (Score:1)