The Luxury of a Bottomless Bucket of Bandwidth For Georgia Schools 117
Lemeowski writes: The IT departments at all the University System of Georgia institutions have a luxury that most CIOs could only dream of — access to about 2,800 miles of free fiber and a private cloud that they an always count on. The private cloud configuration allows the perk of not focusing on bandwith. "Our local CIOs even take some pleasure in telling telecom company representatives, 'If you can beat free, then I'm willing to listen.' That tends to shut down most conversations,"writes USG CIO Curt Carver, who explains how the technology is now becoming an educational equalizer across the state. In 2015, Georgia school districts are expected to have a 33-fold increase in bandwdith available to them through the program. "This will help to flatten the state. No more haves or have-nots in terms of bandwidth going into the school districts."
Free to who? (Score:1)
Surely it's not free to the taxpayers.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Depends on the school/university, as some depend entirely on tuition and run like a business, others have a large endowment, and some get most of their money from grants and research. A lot of the places that fall into the latter two categories will state a large tuition rate, but then give need based grants to students to cover anything beyond what is expected from their family (using typically a standard EFC formula). The result is only a small portion pays full tuition, and increases in tuition only im
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Surely it's not free to the taxpayers.
True, but the point is that it's free to the end point user, who would have nothing otherwise.
Instead of having each of the 6,000 plus schools and colleges run their own network department, each rent bandwidth, and each run a budget item for it, the University System of Georgia pays for it and maintains it. In other words, just like any large corporation would do. Schools in rural areas an't get high-speed bandwidth through the commercial carriers for anything affordable, and in some rural areas you can't
Re: (Score:1)
I'm actually involved in building out the fiber and connectivity to more than half of these schools. Posting anonymously because I'm probably under some NDA that the salesjerks haven't shared with me. I'm not sure who is funding it but Peachnet is the customer of record, and they're farming this out to a large Telco, who will then turn around and sub-contract out some of the schools to other telcos where they do not have fiber. I expect the funding is a combination of state and federal but I don't know the
So who's taxes are paying for this? (Score:1)
The article doesn't mention anything about how this "impressive" infrastructure is maintained.
Do they have a bunch of tinker fairies that live in Georgia that we don't know about???
Re: (Score:3)
I imagine it's paid for by the "technology use fees" paid by every student of the USG.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
The same people who would be paying even more to get less capability for one-off connections for their county schools. Bandwidth gets cheap fast when you can buy large amounts.
Bandwidth is not a finite resource (Score:2, Interesting)
And I wish people would stop talking about as such its unlimited everything is run by peering agreements were the backbone providers just exchange traffic for free. The only charge is the last mile of infrastructure and theres no reason that has to be expensive either.
Re: (Score:2)
UGA has 15,000 male college students. I think they can use it.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Given the body of your post ... and the content of your sig ... the mind reels.
Not a link I'll be clicking.
Re: (Score:2)
As one female acquaintance said of the dating scene at GA Tech: "The odds are good... but the goods are odd."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
"And how are the students using their bottomless bandwidth?"
(Looks at screens) " Too much bottomless! Too much bottomless!"
Re: (Score:2)
At my university we have (legitimate) 100Mbps connections -- for surfing the web, sure, it doesn't much matter. But for reasonably large files (disk images, backups, etc.), it's still a bottleneck.
Re: (Score:2)
Free Beating (Score:5, Insightful)
'If you can beat free, then I'm willing to listen.'
Well, someone should tell them its not free, its just that they don't get the bill. Its not clear from the article what the actual cost is.
Re: (Score:2)
Even if we ignore the sunk cost of the already laid fiber, it still has to managed, and that ain't free.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And what happens if there's a drop in lottery spending?
Re: (Score:2)
PowerBall
Mega Millions
Fantasy 5
Georgia Five
Cash4
Cash3
Keno
All Or Nothing
Numerous Scratch offs
Giant Redneck / Poor / Elderly Population / Hopeful Middle-Aged
Daily media of all sorts decrying that all these proceeds will go straight to the HOPE Scholarship program
I don't think this will be a problem in the foreseeable future. The beast must be fed; the beast knows how to get its food.
Re: (Score:2)
Albeit unlikely, the question is still valid. We're not talking a huge drop. But enough that the spending is outpacing the revenue, etc. The spending on this network would feasibly grow overtime, that means the revenues from the lottery need to grow as much as well over time. So even a drop in growth.
Re: (Score:2)
One can hope that the trend would be gradual enough that the state could come up with an alternate source or revenue for education before a crisis (not holding my breath on that one). That said at the risk of getting flamed:
This is Georgia we're talking about. Home of Redneck Games, Honey Boo Boo (Christ I used to live not 5 minutes from the neighborhood she moved to), and the general mentality among the up-and-coming youth that Construction or other forms of manual labor is the best employer (still). Yea
Re: (Score:2)
Even if we ignore the sunk cost of the already laid fiber, it still has to managed, and that ain't free.
Every building on their campus also has a huge sunk cost and operational costs, but we don't expect them to rent office space rather than manage their own buildings on their own campus. Why should critical infrastructure like their network be any different?
I'd be surprised if the fiber network maintenance is a huge portion of their campus network budget. I managed a small corporate campus network (5 interconnected buildings, the longest run was around a kilometer), and the fiber network cost nothing to main
Re: (Score:2)
It's still at least an order of magnitude cheaper than renting it from a fiber provider.
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, I thought it was free because they owned the fiber in the ground.
Maybe I'm wrong.
And was the fiber put there by magic fairies?
Is it maintained by magic fairies?
Re: (Score:2)
It was put there by people voluntarily playing the lottery.
Re: (Score:2)
Ahh, but it wasn't... unless they went out and did the work themselves.
Those tickets made money, and someone decided to spend that money on this fiber.
Which is fine, but money is fungible, it can be used for almost anything, so that money also could have been used to build roads, or reduce taxes.
So the fiber wasn't free.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, the law that authorized the Ga Lottery specifies that it must be spent for education and that it must be in addition to funds allocated from the general budget. It was the only way to overcome opposition.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, until the general budget gets changed... :)
Texas did the same thing over a decade ago, if you compare the pre and post edu budgets, you'll see the same thing happened...
Besides, no one says it has to be spent on fiber for the schools, it could be spent on teachers to reduce the student teacher ratio...
So the fiber still isn't free. :)
Re: (Score:2)
Nothing whatsoever is free by your standards. Absolutely nothing. Since that would render the word meaningless, you might want to adjust your definition.
It is free for the schools and free from the taxpayers in the sense that neither the schools or the taxpayers had to pay for it.
It is free in the sense that all of the money spent on it was freely given.
Re: (Score:2)
It isn't free in that the money could have been used to lower my taxes.
Thus it isn't free at all.
The sunlight shining on all of us is free. The air around us is free. The dirt we're standing on is free.
Your thoughts are free, your love for your family is free.
Fiber optic cables are anything but free.
---
Note: I'm not even suggesting this is a BAD way to spend money, perhaps it is a good thing. I'm simply pointing out that it did cost money and it wasn't free, the school just didn't write a check for it, b
Re: (Score:2)
That sun shining on you could have been caught by a solar panel. The air you're breathing could have been my endless sink for toxic gasses. You could be doing productive work rather than having a family. The dirt under your feet could be the site of a new pay parking garage. Etc. Etc. Etc.
Shouldn't you be thinking about work?
Re: (Score:2)
Now you're just being obtuse... :)
Re: (Score:2)
Anything worth doing is worth overdoing! :).
Re: (Score:2)
'If you can beat free, then I'm willing to listen.'
Well, someone should tell them its not free, its just that they don't get the bill. Its not clear from the article what the actual cost is.
sigh.
It should be obvious to anyone that read the article that what he meant was free at the endpoint - free to the school that receives the bandwidth.
How can I explain it?
My next door neighbor was working in his garden, and I told him him could take a break and offered him a beer.
I handed him a beer over the fence. He did not give me any money.
He got a free beer.
I know that I had to earn the money to buy the beer,
He got a free beer because he didn't give me any money.
I know that the brewery had
Re: (Score:2)
My exa
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You don't get it. If you gave him that beer from the community fund, that he himself was contributing to, he didn't get a free beer and might wonder why you were using the community chess to give him a beer, or if that was the wisest use of that money. If the state educational system is funding it, just because a school doesn't see the bill doesn't mean its free. Or, in your case, everything for the school is free because they really aren't paying for anything, they are just workers at the schools. My example is a lot shorter as well!
It drive me nuts when someone makes the argument that something is not free because somebody paid for it somewhere.
It's free to the person who got it and did not pay for it, otherwise the word "free" has no meaning.
Sure, Peachnet is funded ultimately by the State of Georgia taxes and lottery players, and all money ultimately comes from the labor of the proletariat or something like that. The thing is that various entities have their own budgets, whether it's my bank account, schools, or the fire departme
Re: (Score:2)
'If you can beat free, then I'm willing to listen.'
Well, someone should tell them its not free, its just that they don't get the bill. Its not clear from the article what the actual cost is.
But that's the point - they don't get the bill. Would it be the same w/ the telecom guys who approach him?
They've finally built a 100% uptime cloud? (Score:2)
a private cloud that they an always count on
I hope they share this cloud technology with the rest of the world, so we can all have access to a cloud we can count on. This sounds almost too good to be true, but if the CIO said it, it must be true!
I'd like to see some interviews from the departmental IT staff that use this always available, unlimited use bandwidth and cloud.
Re: (Score:2)
Now if they could just make this service available to alumni, I'd be set. Heck, I'd pay them. My house isn't that far from campus, and their service clearly can't be any worse than AT&T or Charter.
Re: (Score:2)
Free Market Solution? (Score:5, Funny)
This doesn't seem like a good Free Market solution. The state of Georgia could save a lot of money by having private enterprises, with expertise in these areas, sell bandwidth to individual schools. It's just a short move from this, to the communism that is municipal broadband.
Re: (Score:1)
Free Market doesn't always mean less costly. AT&T screwed over the people of Wisconsin writing a bill for the politicians to put in place that made it so they could eliminate this exact type of efficiency that Georgia is doing. Not exactly free market when political contributions are involved.
GFD (Score:5, Funny)
I only recently finished convincing all my non-technie friends that the Internet is not a series of tubes; now I have to start explaining to them that bandwidth does not actually come in buckets. Do you realize how many pounds of email I'll have to write about this? Fuck it, I quit.
Re: (Score:2)
What is the bandwidth of a bucket of microSD cards on the back of a motorcycle?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If we could just solve the latency problem it could be a real winner.
Re: (Score:2)
Right, it doesn't *come* in buckets... that's just where it goes [wikipedia.org] , duh.
In other words, it's a Utility. (Score:5, Insightful)
And proves pretty well, that the government can and does do things better than private corporations.
The key is that the government works best when the service/commodity in questions needs to go to everyone and does not truly have inherent differences in quality, besides quantity.
The internet fits this bill, just like water, electricity, and roads.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Chances are it's about the same price you pay for gasoline, per unit usable energy.
Re: (Score:2)
And proves pretty well, that the government can and does do things better than private corporations.
Ok, what is being done better here?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
What's your link speed? ping? Do you have a bandwidth cap? What's your monthly rate for internet? What's your uptime%? How's your customer service? This system beats any internet service anyone has inside the USA, save for other municipalities who have also made their own ISPs.
"Beats" in what way? I notice several obvious flaws with your argument: no consideration of cost, no consideration of peculiar economics of scale of a considerable university system, and no basis of comparison.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
"And you have yet to address even one of my observations." You made no observations other than "you can't compare them" when you can easily, but you have completely ignored my observations twice now.
I notice you do this a lot, ignore what people are saying that is very relevant, while claiming the same is being done to you when it's not. It's not conducive to good dialogue.
Re: (Score:2)
I notice you do this a lot, ignore what people are saying that is very relevant,
That's because people make a lot of irrelevant observations. I explain below why your post fell into that unfortunate category.
but you have completely ignored my observations twice now.
Comcast serves a different sort of market. And there are private services which are far better fits for a comparison.
Sure, it's similar enough to make a misleading comparison, but it's a bit like comparing a fancy restaurant to a fast food restaurant. Which is better depends on how you weight their respective services, quality, cost, speed of service, etc.
But I think everyone
Re: (Score:2)
Peachnet's budget for 2014 was 25 million to support 80 Colleges and Universities plus the 6,000 K-12 schools. Do you know anything about corporate IT budgets?
Peachnet is not an IT department. Those colleges and schools still need to provide their own IT. And if any of those parties fail to provide adequate IT support, it's no skin off their teeth.
Re: (Score:2)
The internet fits this bill, just like water, electricity, and roads.
That explains why poor quality roads don't exist!
Re: (Score:2)
Not really. The state just sub-contracts all this out to AT&T today, although they opened the bidding up to other carriers for the 2015 upgrade discussed in the article.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, funny thing: water and power aren't always public. In fact, they're usually private, only heavily regulated.
Roads are mostly public, but some states were so cash-strapped they actually sold sections of road to private entities.
There are a lot of things that should be public, those namely being infrastructure (roads, power, communications) and services (police, fire, medicine). The alluring thing about private is that it moves faster and usually is more efficient when building out the service or in
Re: (Score:2)
The article has sentences like this, " It’s essentially a bottomless bucket, as long as it's used efficiently and in a cost-effective manner." So which is it, a bottomless bucket, or something that must be used efficiently? Which is it, free, or something that you have to worry about using cost-effectively? The article doesn't explain, they say they have thousands of miles of fiber, then say it's free (which of course it's not, even if the aut
Re: (Score:2)
The resource is 'free' only in the sense that it isn't encumbered by administrators outside
the state educational system. The indication that it's run well
And the squirrels .. (Score:2)
"Squirrels in Georgia like their fiber, there are always squirrels chewing on fiber lines somewhere, "
Thank you slashdot for continuing to warn society about the ever present squirrel menace: http://hardware.slashdot.org/s... [slashdot.org] http://beta.slashdot.org/submi... [slashdot.org] https://www.google.com/#q=slas... [google.com]
Re: (Score:2)
I saw this. What kind of crazy squirrels does America have that can digest glass? Seriously, I can't imagine it does their insides any good!
*insert high fibre diet joke here*
Jobs for some (Score:1)
I wonder how many jobs the state lost for this communist nirvana. Not so much the telecom jobs, because any state endeavor is going to employ 4 useless people to do the job of one productive individual. But all that infrastructure comes with a great big government check - that is inevitably written against a great big tax. Taxes are the unseen killer in any economy.
It is also worth calling out the studies coming out showing, remarkably, that you cannot replace Teaching with Technology. No rational perso
Re: (Score:2)
Before spouting nonsense on the internet, maybe you should inform yourself on how it was and is funded since your post makes you sound like a commie-hating loon that doesn't trust the guberment.
cio cio cio... (Score:2)
I'm happy for all those CIOs with all that bandwidth. Deliriously happy. But wait, has there ever been a CIO who didn't have lots of bandwidth compared to average people?
Tell me about the real people who benefit from this. The college students, high school students, government employees, etc. Oh, that's for the future? So why are we reading this on slashdot?
Re: (Score:2)
Bah. Cynical. I'm benefitting directly from this now, and I am no where's near the level of a CIO. The community at large here benefits in this college town because the bandwidth demands of the local colleges (3 within this town alone; 2 of which are part of the USG; and I'm not even including the campuses/offices for the local presence of Virginia Tech and University of Phoenix) as well as the demands of local students to be able to communicate large amounts of audio/video data (legitimate video conferen
We'll have the results (Score:2)
We'll know this is working and improving education when we see GA become a blue state.
Free? (Score:1)
Really not news... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
They have a heart. That's why we love them instead of you. No one could ever love you, which upsets you doesn't it? Go ahead. Admit it to yourself.