Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
Security Television IT Hardware

Millions of Smart TVs Vulnerable To 'Red Button' Attack 155

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers from Columbia University's Network Security Lab discovered a flaw affecting millions of Smart TVs supporting the HbbTV standard. The flaw allows a radio-frequency attacker with a low budget to take control over tens of thousands of TVs in a single attack, forcing the TVs to interact with any website on their behalf — Academic paper available online."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Millions of Smart TVs Vulnerable To 'Red Button' Attack

Comments Filter:
  • by jones_supa ( 887896 ) on Sunday June 08, 2014 @05:59AM (#47189473)
    So the idea is that the attacker overrides the RF signal with his own one, which contains the malicious data. The client TV then automatically interprets the HTML from the transport stream metadata. Provided that the attack was successful, a bunch of TVs can for example be controlled to access a certain website through HTTP requests, causing a denial of service attack for that website.
  • by Opportunist ( 166417 ) on Sunday June 08, 2014 @07:41AM (#47189651)

    I've been doing audits for a rather long while now. Few companies have sensors on their inside.

    In other words, it will be easy to find out THAT something went on after the incident. Who did it, otoh, is an entirely different matter. You'd be surprised how easy it is to get into a lot of companies and move about unhindered with the right uniform and the "I belong here" attitude.

  • by Opportunist ( 166417 ) on Sunday June 08, 2014 @09:21AM (#47189891)

    Heh. Well, I'm kinda proud of our security staff, they even sent a board member back (despite said board member ranting and raving about how he'll ensure the security person be fired) because he forgot his access card.

    And yes, the board member actually demanded him to be fired. When I asked him if he really wants me to fire one of our guards on grounds of him doing his job and following the security protocol unlike a certain board member who expected and ordered the guard to break security protocol, suddenly he had to leave in a hurry... dunno why...

    I LOVE working in a company where security trumps productivity.

  • by citizenr ( 871508 ) on Sunday June 08, 2014 @09:21AM (#47189893) Homepage []

    This is an USB dongle, you push TS stream into it. Bundled Opencaster software will build TS stream for you. Basically its a small Digital TV station capable of transmitting one mux.

    * DVB-T version, will not work with ATSC TVs in US. Btw LOL US and your ATSC A/53 mpeg2 "hd"tv.

  • by BronsCon ( 927697 ) <> on Sunday June 08, 2014 @10:21AM (#47190051) Journal
    In this case, it's more like "Oh no, I've been inconvenienced as a direct result of someone else's negligent actions."

    If the end result of TV manufacturers not releasing a more secure firmware for the affected models is your TV running malicious code that, say, simply bricks your TV, they should be liable for repair or replacement costs. If the result is that your TV ends up running code that hacks into your computer and steals your financial and personal details, they should likewise be liable for any resulting fraud and the cost of cleaning up that mess. In both cases, maybe a little something for the trouble, as well; it's best for society that we discourage purposeful negligence like this.

    We're not talking about simply missing a TV show here; there are real and potentially damaging implications here.
  • by Kalriath ( 849904 ) on Sunday June 08, 2014 @06:48PM (#47192099)

    Another effective mechanism, is to Decline the privacy policy. According to a recent Slashdot post, that disables pretty much every smart feature the TV has.

Variables don't; constants aren't.