Researchers Buy Twitter Bots To Fight Twitter Spam 45
tsu doh nimh writes "The success of social networking community Twitter has given rise to an entire shadow economy that peddles dummy Twitter accounts by the thousands, primarily to spammers, scammers and malware purveyors. But new research on identifying bogus accounts has helped Twitter to drastically deplete the stockpile of existing accounts for sale, and holds the promise of driving up costs for both vendors of these shady services and their customers. Krebsonsecurity.com writes about a paper (PDF) being released today at the USENIX conference that details how researchers spent almost a year and $5,000 buying up accounts from 27 twitter account merchants, and then built templates to help Twitter detect accounts sold by these merchants — all with the aim of getting more of these bot accounts shut down before they can be used to spam legitimate Twitter users. The story goes into great detail on the lengths to which these account merchants will go to evade Twitter's anti-bot security measures."
Email Statistics (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
So rare to see a though provoking, well written piece from Stormfront.org. The best part was this: If every time a mountain released smoke and had earthquakes there was a terrible volcanic eruption, and you live near a mountain, and it starts doing this, you get the fuck out. Not because you hate the mountain, not because you think it is inferior to other mountains, not because you don't like its color. No, you get the fuck out because you don't want to be buried in a pyroclastic flow.
I will be honest. I
Twitter won't let you filter spam (Score:5, Informative)
Of course Twitter is a spam magnet. Twitter won't let people write Twitter clients with spam filters.
Re:dummy (Score:1)
beliebers are bots. That's the problem.
There are legitimate Twitter users? (Score:5, Funny)
Now you're just making stuff up.
Re: (Score:2)
No no it's real. There are twitter users who are actual persons. :"Hey look at this product, it's awesome and with an affordable price tag. I am using it without problem for months!" is clearly a cheap twitbot, while "OMG LOST MATCH AGAIN DAAAAAMN!!!!1!" is clearly the product of a human brain.
For example
Re: (Score:1)
SMH @thunderclap I have 40000 posts and 686 actual people who listen.
Here's $5000, now stop doing that (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
They gave $5000 to Twitter account merchants. It doesn't seem to me that was the smartest thing to do with the money if you actually want to discourage this kind of activity.
I had the same idea, but now I wonder how much they managed to raise autogenerated twitter account price. 5000 USD could be seen as an investment
Re: (Score:2)
If by spending $5,000 you manage to get information that leads to $100,000 worth of accounts being disabled before they can be used and increases the cost of creating new accounts then it seems to me like it's a very good way to discourage that activity.
Very easy to get rid of the majority of spam (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
How the hell can I rickroll, goatse or send annoying pics of ufly ass things to you then?
Re: (Score:1)
Sheep need to be feed.
Who cares (Score:1)
Twitter could shut down tomorrow and I could give zero fucks about the loss.
Re:Who cares (Score:5, Insightful)
Which , by definition, makes most slashdot'ers as poor as dirt.
Re: (Score:3)
You haven't been hoarding yours like the rest of us?
How about t.co spam? (Score:2)
Nearly every spam I get these days uses the t.co link shortener to disguise the destination of the links. I report every one through Spamcop, which reports them to abuse@twitter.com, but it never seems to make a difference.
What good is one of those twitter accounts? (Score:2)
Why would anyone pay money to buy an account that lets you tell people what color your belly-button lint is today?
In order to get anyone to read a feed off twitter.com, you have to get them to subscribe to it -- if you go to twitter.com all you get is a sign-up form, you can't even browse or search to see what the site is about. You certainly can't find some randomly created account -- this scam seems pointless.
Of what possible use is one of these auto-generated accounts? The article does not explain.
Any
Re: (Score:2)
Just one example, there are lots more.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'd imagine the record company could want to hijack 's twitter account to peddle other bands to their followers to generate sales & hype... Doesn't seem too unreasonable? To record companies, bands are just an tool to make them money right?
Their twitter account could then become just another advertising stream until the next fad comes along
Re: (Score:2)
The stupid, it burns (Score:2)
First, putting money into the pockets of its adversaries is idiotic.
Second, pretending that content/context filtering based on examination of their
5 de mis mejores consejos del edificio del mú (Score:1)