Wikileaks Opens Official Online Store 142
siliconbits writes "You can now buy officially branded Julian Assange T-Shirts, cups, netbook sleeves or bags and contribute financially to the Wikileaks fight. From the article: 'Wikileaks is looking to generate more revenue by launching an online shop that is run by Spreadshirt AG. Supporters of Julian Assange and the Wikileaks cause will be able to buy a variety of products like shirts, messenger bags, hats, buttons, scarves etc.'"
Obligatory (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Obligatory (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
We call those BCTs.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I wouldn't buy that shirt anyways. You're getting raped at that price!
Re: (Score:2)
That didn't work for Julian, he had a face with his face on it!
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Obligatory (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Here you go.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-rape_device [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
But where are the Julian Assange contraceptives? ;)
Julian Assange IS a contraceptive ;-)
Re:Obligatory (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This would be funnier if she had told him no. Since she didn't (by her own admission) it just looks like another astroturf attack.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I want the Wikileaks branded douche bag.
Re:Obligatory (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Still held up in the UK, but we're extraditing.
Re: (Score:1)
I want the Wikileaks branded douche bag.
You'll find him in your local bar, hitting on women one after the other.
Sad thing is, it'll eventually work...
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Not quite Julian Assange, but still [mobypicture.com].
Re: (Score:2)
>>But where are the Julian Assange contraceptives? ;)
"Courage is Contagious" (http://wikileaks.spreadshirt.com/courage-is-contagious-A7070351/customize/color/294)
Yes, and so is syphilis!
There's your contraceptive. On top of looking like a giant wanker for wearing one of these atrocities.
Shirt Spam? (Score:4, Informative)
Wikileaks has officially jumped the shark (Score:4, Insightful)
Whether you liked it before, or hated it, it's now an Assange fan club, of no real importance or effectiveness. Beware the cult of personality, even those would ostensibly believe in similar causes to you.
T-Shirt's with his picture? Seriously?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Haha. Now that tshirt, I might buy.
Re: (Score:1)
I know what you mean man. Wikileaks sold out and only started leaking information about big countries like the US and info on big corporate banks. There is this website I know of that is totally going to break the news on the manipulation of the false tooth and potassium storage unit market of Liechtenstein. I would tell you the web address (you have probably never heard of it) but the server is really small so you probably wouldn't be let in anyway.
Re: (Score:3)
I think what the guys over at "Openleaks" thought is true, and that is the fact Assange has taken so much of the limelight, that many people confuse Assange as Wikeleaks as being the same thing. Whether it helps or hurts I am not sure.
I actually was interested in getting a Wikileaks mug, but all they had is stuff that you had to wear in public.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Openleaks seems like the wrong approach, though.
They say they won't publish anything, only send it to newspapers. But that means that things only get published if a newspaper finds it interesting enough to publish, and they probably won't post the entire source document either. And if nobody is willing to post it, nobody will ever see it.
I'm fine with wikileaks alternatives and don't particularly care about Assange, but I want raw data, and lots of it. And no dependence on media organizations.
Re:Wikileaks has officially jumped the shark (Score:4, Funny)
I'm fine with wikileaks alternatives and don't particularly care about Assange, but I want raw data, and lots of it.
/dev/random
enjoy.
Re: (Score:1)
He didn't say he wanted random data. /dev/zero gives you data much faster.
Re: (Score:2)
>I actually was interested in getting a Wikileaks mug, but all they had is stuff that you had to wear in public.
My mug arrived a few days ago, check it out here : http://officialwikileakseu.spreadshirt.net/p6 [spreadshirt.net]
Re: (Score:2)
It appears to depend on which store you choose. The Euro store has the mug, but the Canadian store doesn't.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
it's now an Assange fan club, of no real importance or effectiveness
I disagree, it's at most distracting from their mission by giving cable news fluff to focus on rather than the actual important stuff, but Fox news reporting on alleged rapes rather than the corruption they exposed was never the goal. If they ever release the incriminating documents on bank of America, and they prove actually incriminating or surprising (as opposed to stuff like "they're incompetent and abusive to customers" which we knew already), the Assange circus won't prevent that.
If the documents
Re: (Score:3)
If they ever release the incriminating documents on bank of America, and they prove actually incriminating or surprising...
Yeah, about that... Wasn't that stuff supposed to be released back in January or early February sometime? Is there a reason they are still dragging it out? I was kind of looking forward to what was supposed to be a release that involved "major scandals of some of the world's largest financial players." Have we heard anything about that stuff recently?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Just wait until they get leaked to someone outside of WikiLeaks, just like the diplomatic cables: http://www.aftenposten.no/spesial/cablegate/ [aftenposten.no]
Re: (Score:3)
But where are those documents?
he has been talking them up for months now. for the diplomatic cable releases he talked about them for months and months and months before anything was released., and when it was released all it showed was standard international politics and gossip for the most part.
If he was releasing data to benefit everyone why is his face on a shirt? he shouldn't have anything to do but redact documents and make sure the servers are running.
There should be no single point of failure in so
Re: (Score:2)
I don't watch Fox news and I still don't know about corruption they exposed. Please, could you list some of the things. As far as I know, most all of the leaks were benign and the ones that weren't seemed to subject to much interpretation in order to be damaging.
As for your point on Bank of America, it appears that you are wishing for bad news and do not have any insight that isn't already publicly available. You are complaining that there isn't more news that you want to hear and all you do hear is somethi
Re: (Score:2)
Why do I imagine people wearing this shirt and then going through the airport and acting like an ass. Then when they get searched they will say it is because of they support wikileaks.
Re: (Score:2)
And they'll probably be right, actually. The government profiles people that are against it; big surprise!
Re: (Score:1)
So if you act like an ass and are searched it's not because you acted like an ass, but because you were profiled?
Re: (Score:1)
It's true. I walked into a bank wearing a balaclava, and those damn Nazi rent-a-cops threatened to shoot me. The profiling never stops ...
Re: (Score:2)
for a minute there, I thought you were talking about a baklava [wikipedia.org] and I was wondering how that was even possible.
So I looked it up and found I didn't need to answer that question.
Re: (Score:3)
It's hipster trash. Why am I not surprised at crap like this.
irrelevant (Score:2, Insightful)
There are soo many leaks sites running around now that Assange won't "control the market" anymore. Imho, Assange deserves credit for pushing this cultural shift, both by trying to make an uncrackable publication chain and by putting himself on the line going after the U.S. I'll buy a shirt with his face for that.
You'll notice however that Anonymous' HBGary hackers didn't bother protecting their anonymity by gong through wikileaks, they just handled it themselves using proxies, friends, public wifi, etc.
Re:Wikileaks has officially jumped the shark (Score:4, Insightful)
There's a donation-based non-profit engaged in a pitched legal battle against some of the wealthiest and most powerful people in the world. How would you suggest they raise the funds necessary to defend themselves?
Re: (Score:1)
Edit: "They are"
Re: (Score:2)
There were those of us that pointed out that he was a meglomaniac and would eventually destroy Wikileaks in his desire to be the Central Poomba. Everyone that pointed this out was marked as Trolls by the blind followers. Anyone that didn't notice that this was all about him wasn't paying attention. All the money is donated to him, not the movement. He's actually tried to claim ownership of the leaks and he was livid when someone leaked information about himself but he was perfectly willing to leak informan
Re:Wikileaks has officially jumped the shark (Score:5, Insightful)
When Assange said "Killing people is fun" he very obviously meant that the American soldiers massacring civilians found the killing to be fun.
And what you don't seem to understand is that people understand this and find it to reflect Assange's level of ignorance. But don't let that get in the way of your asserting yourself as so far above all the sheep.
Re: (Score:2)
And what you don't seem to understand is that people understand this and find it to reflect Assange's level of ignorance.
When soldiers stop talking to us about the rush of combat then we'll stop assuming that a significant percentage of them enjoy it. It is fairly reasonable for a soldier to adopt a personality which enjoys killing to avoid cracking under the strain of their actions, and not unusual. What is unreasonable is to go to war for false pretenses and create a situation where humans for whose wellbeing you are responsible have to become schizophrenics to continue functioning.
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1640680/ [imdb.com]
Quote from a review by Howard Schumann:
Re: (Score:2)
When soldiers stop talking to us about the rush of combat then we'll stop assuming that a significant percentage of them enjoy it. It is fairly reasonable for a soldier to adopt a personality which enjoys killing to avoid cracking under the strain of their actions, and not unusual. What is unreasonable is to go to war for false pretenses and create a situation where humans for whose wellbeing you are responsible have to become schizophrenics to continue functioning.
So what - you're saying soldiers should lie? You're saying that we should go back to the fiction of romantic war?
Your quip about false pretenses has no place in this discussion. That's politics. When you want to talk about the horrors and inhumanity of warfare, politics are moot. War is just as horrible when "justified" as when it isn't.
Re: (Score:2)
So what - you're saying soldiers should lie? You're saying that we should go back to the fiction of romantic war?
Uh no. What I'm saying is that soldiers DO enjoy killing, and I'm saying that we should stop making war for profit. You have to take a fairly obtuse read of my comment to get out of it what you got, deliberately or not. The sibling to my comment has it figured out.
Your quip about false pretenses has no place in this discussion. That's politics.
It does have a place in this discussion. As I see it, the soldiers have two choices. They can learn to enjoy killing, or they can be bad at a very important aspect of their job; doing it badly can result in them not coming home. I do believe that
Re: (Score:2)
So what - you're saying soldiers should lie? You're saying that we should go back to the fiction of romantic war?
Uh no. What I'm saying is that soldiers DO enjoy killing, and I'm saying that we should stop making war for profit. You have to take a fairly obtuse read of my comment to get out of it what you got, deliberately or not. The sibling to my comment has it figured out.
Fair enough. However, I believe you're simply muddying the waters. To talk about the rush of adrenaline during combat does not imply over-all enjoyment of the exercise. One can feel the thrill of the moment and, after it passes, realize and feel the negative aspects of those actions. Making war for profit has no place in this conversation.
I should note that I suspect the entire conversational thread is based on a somewhat disingenuous pretext. I don't believe Assange claimed that "killing is fun" in
Re: (Score:2)
You have obviously never taken part in an actual combat situation. The one displaying ignorance is you.
And neither has Assange. But that didn't stop him from claiming the only reason for the "collateral murder" incident was for the gunship crew to get a high score.
Re: (Score:2)
You know, BitZtream, Slashdot is a huge place, and it's kind of sad that I recognize your name from previous stupid posts like the one above.
The collateral murder video was slanted, but it's not like they used heavy clever editing or anything.
Not bad prices on... (Score:5, Funny)
Assange signature condoms and the "I fled Sweden and all I got was this lousy t-shirt" shirts. I did find the "Let loose this cable" boxer shorts and "I'm probably going to fry" chef aprons to be a bit distasteful.
what, no aviator sunglasses? (Score:2)
Gear without his face? (Score:4, Interesting)
I don't want his smug holier-than-thou bullshit grin on my clothing. Wikileaks I can support, Assange I can not.
Re:Gear without his face? (Score:4, Informative)
Just look in the shop, there's plenty gear with the logo as well.
Re: (Score:2)
But...but...he's this generations Che Guevara. Look forward to seeing all sorts of losers sporting t-shirts with Assange's face on them.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Che Guevara got his hands dirty through massacres and summary executions.
Nothing there to love.
Re: (Score:1)
My post was mostly tongue-in-cheek. The people who are most likely going to wear these t-shirts with Assange's face are mostly just as braindead as the hipsters who wear Che shirts without ever knowing anything about him other than the fact that it's "cool" to have his face on your shirt.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
How is that ignorant? Are you saying these people are not weirdos?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
“Weirdos email us about UFOs or how they discovered that they were the anti-christ whilst talking with their ex-wife at a garden party over a pot-plant,&rdquo
Please explain the ignorance in this statement?
Re: (Score:2)
Dude, you're falling for this hook, line, and sinker. He's a lightning rod.
Re: (Score:2)
Then why are you sending money to Assange? You do realize that there is no foundation, no structure and that all the money donated is going to his personal accounts right?
Re: (Score:2)
Anyone verified this is actually legit? (Score:5, Interesting)
Is this for real (has Assange actually endorsed this?) or is this just a scam or another attempt to discredit/embarrass Wikileaks/Assange? I haven't seen anything about it on Wikileaks actual website.
Re: (Score:2)
I've already received my shirts a week ago. so at least those are real.
When I contacted them with some questions I was responded to from an address of wikileaks.de which my server said was sent from an email server at wl.datendetektei.de. Their email server is also a mirror of the wikileaks site and the main wikileaks site lists wl.datendetektei.de as an official mirror site. I would think that this means that this is as legit as that faction is.
Re: (Score:1)
According to the shop-info, the email address shown as a contact is @wikileaks.de which according to DENIC whois-info is owned by Theodor Reppe, a German Wikileaks supporter. Although not a very smart one, as a quick Google search reveals.
I wouldn't bet on this being completely legit.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
https://twitter.com/#!/wikileaks/status/39841406323265537 [twitter.com] for those that want to see it
Oh boy (Score:2)
Wonder if they sell Wikileaks: Inside Julian Assange's War on Secrecy...
Re: (Score:2)
They won't be getting it. Spreadshirt [wikipedia.org] is like cafepress and sells stuff for everybody. It's also a german shop, so I doubt they hand out credit card info to anybody. Europe has quite tight regulations on that kind of thing.
But alternatively, you can mail the money [wikileaks.ch]
Re: (Score:2)
Sell Out. (Score:3)
If you are going to show how the Rich people in charge are corrupt... You shouldn't do that while selling your own wares.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If you are going to show how the Rich people in charge are corrupt... You shouldn't do that while selling your own wares.
"If you're going to show how the mouth-breathers are wrong, you should stop breathing as well" does not sound productive. Who can do anything without resources? "If you're going to show how humans are bad, you should not be one yourself." Yes, I'm taking your thought too far to demonstrate the absurdity. It's a non-profit, going against the most profitable companies in the world. How would you provide resources for your goals if not through the easily-exchangeable form of money?
Wikileaks Coffee Mugs (Score:2)
Wikileaks stopped offering coffee mugs on the store because they made such a mess.
I RAPED TWO SWEDES! (Score:2)
And all I got was this lousy t-shirt.
Re: (Score:2)
So far.
WikiLeaks vs Assange? (Score:2)
So how much of the income actually goes to WikiLeaks-the-website, versus funding for Assange's legal defense fund (on UNRELATED charges) or to support Assange's own ego-inflated life-style?
I might be persuaded to support WikiLeaks, but I won't spend a single penny to support Assange's defense on a rape charge. (And the idea that the Swedes, of all countries, are going to send Assange to Git-Mo, is particularly ludicrous. UK is -much closer- to the US in that regard; if I were Assange and I really believed
Bitcoins, duh (Score:1)
With all the problems with various institutions blocking wikileaks transactions its a mystery why they don't support Bitcoin. Bitcoins can't be blocked, traced, back-charged, or any nonsense like that, plus there are no fees or central authorities to game the system. Peer 2 Peer (P2P) Currency baby!
And of course you can exchange them for dollars, or Euros, or Rubles, or gold, or xBox 360s on the internet....when the time comes.
If wikileaks starts accepting Bitcoins I pledge $500 USD transferred in $BTC (Ab
Pathetic. (Score:2)
I've been noticing that images of Assange in the media have been growing increasingly messianic. He's essentially been turned into this dapper stud. I think Wikileaks is great, but I have a huge problem with the way this one twit, who seems to have a massive ego, is getting all the credit.
I find it pathetic that people can't help but glorify an individual for something scores of people have worked towards. It's not just those who built Wikileaks, but all the personal risks people have taken to leak all that
What is the big deal? (Score:5, Insightful)
Wow. I see a lot of funny comments, but also a lot of whiny bitches. *cry* Assange is a media whore! Assange is a poser! Assange is this, Assange is that */cry* Really? Does anyone read what they type before they hit submit?
1) The shirts with his face aren't the only item in the store. I bought a hat that says Wikileaks on it, along with a shirt that says the same. You don't have to buy the one with the pic of his face on it. (Frankly, the shirt with his face on it IS kinda on the creepy side. Not sure who would buy that shirt, Assange fan-boy or not. But that doesn't make the whole idea of wikileaks selling stuff wrong.)
2) Not sure what the big deal is. WikiLeaks needs $, just like any other organization, in order to keep the leaks flowing. Nobody is forcing you to buy a shirt with Assange's face on it. In fact, nobody is forcing you to buy anything at all.
3) Assange fan-club or not, WikiLeaks has provided, and will hopefully continue to provide, insight into the shady dealings of governments and military's . They have done more good than bad. Who cares if Assange likes media attention? If WikiLeaks never had media attention, then the leaks would be MEANINGLESS. Assange never asked for rape charges to be drummed up and then covered to DEATH by every major media outlet. And he has, for the most part, used the media coverage to dispel the lies and get the word out about WikiLeaks and the content of the actual leaks.
4) How is it a bad thing they are doing this? This store is most likely in response to their other means of funding being shut down! Remember how you used to be able to donate through paypal? Well now you can donate by buying a freaking Assange shirt. Either support them or shut up. I really don't see another reason to try and call Assange a media whore again. That isn't what the store is about. It's about funding wikileaks.
Re: (Score:2)
I wish I had the mod points to mod this up. Sick of people going nuts calling Assange a media whore. Like he enjoys being called a rapist in newspapers around the world.
Leakers (Score:2)
Oooo, do they have a shirt that says "Leakers do it by surprise" on the back?
Re: (Score:2)
Alternate Title (Score:2)
Only if..... (Score:1)
Biohazard! t-shirt (Score:1)
Sure, give your credit card to Wikileaks (Score:2)
Among other also ran candidates (Score:1)
How disappointing (Score:2)
I thought you could buy state secrets!
(Cheap of course - and a sale on weekends!)
Caveat emptor (Score:2)
If you buy anything from their shop, they post your credit card info and billing address online.
Donations (Score:1)
step 3 (Score:1)
Google analytics (Score:1)