MS Excel Users Susceptible To New Vulnerability 64
nandemoari writes "Microsoft has warned users that yet another critical vulnerability has been found in its popular Office spreadsheet program Excel. The flaw could allow remote hackers to open and run malicious code on an unsuspecting user's computer through an infected spreadsheet file.
Products affected include Office 2000, Office 2002, Office 2003, Office 2007, Office 2004 for Mac, Office 2008 for Mac, and the Open XML File Format Converter for Mac."
dupe? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:dupe? (Score:5, Informative)
Don't be a dildo. The article linked in the summary points to an article on Ars that points to this page:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/968272.mspx [microsoft.com]
The link in the comment you replied to points an infoworld article that points to this page:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/968272.mspx [microsoft.com]
The articles are about the same issue.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Redundant)
No. Re-read the first sentence of the summary and pay attention to a very important qualifier which I will bold for you.
Nice try, but if you actually did 1 min of research you'd realize they're referencing the same issue..
Re: (Score:2)
This is one of those stories that deserves a dupe at a different time of day so that it's seen by more readers. It's getting no mainstream coverage, yet almost as many businesses and students who use Windows also use Excel and this is a gaping zero-day problem. Same advice as Access files now applies to Excel... you may be opening an unknown executable by opening a crafted-to-do-so .xls file.
Really?? (Score:4, Funny)
I hadn't heard [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:1)
Oh, have you not heard? It was my understanding that everyone had heard. [youtube.com]
Leave it to Microsoft... (Score:2, Insightful)
... to create a vulnerability on my Mac.
Re:Leave it to Microsoft... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
It's times like these I wish the mod points went higher than 5.
Thank you very much for a good laugh. QuickTime = The Plague on my computer. How I wish I could get rid of it.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for the suggestion, but, unfortunately, I *do* use and like iTunes. The whole "being bundled together" thing is what I can't get around.
Re: (Score:1)
I for one applaud them for finally achieving compatibility between OS's and Office versions.
And people wonder why... (Score:4, Insightful)
I choose to use open office, even though I get M$ office free through work.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Calc has issues (Score:2)
Oo Writer is fine, and I use Oo exclusively at home on the principle that document standards should be open.
But yes, I use Excel at work and Calc at home, and Calc is very annoying by comparison.
For one thing, Excel will let you set a default number format (currency, integer, date, etc) on a whole row or column and whatever you enter thereafter will use that format. I try that with Calc, and it never works. Not only does it not remember the setting, but it forces me to apply the formatting to EACH individua
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure what you are doing. But you are doing it wrong.
I've been using OOoCalc for a little over a year. It does have some annoyances, but loss of pre set formats is not one of them. I suspect that there is a default setting or preference that governs this.
Personal annoyances:
Re: (Score:2)
What I am doing is highlighting some cells, and going to Format, Cells, and choosing a format. (I'm basing this on Excel, which I have in front of me right now, but I believe the steps are the same in Oo.) How is that not the right way to format cells?
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like possibly the formating you have set up in advance of data entry is being overwritten by the "AutoInput" reformating capability, or something like that.
Play around with your settings under Tools/Cell_Contents and Tools/Auto_Correct. Also, look over the options in Tools/Options.
Also, get familiar with your resources. The OOo Help system is generally more useable than MS Help ever was (it is not yet complete and some of the entries need more clarification... but the volunteers are continously i
So is it still.... (Score:2)
OO to the rescue? (Score:2)
Does this mean that OpenOffice is the workaround for the moment?
Re:OO to the rescue? (Score:4, Informative)
Does this mean that OpenOffice is the workaround for the moment?
Well, that, or not opening unexpected spreadsheets emailed to you by random strangers.
Re: (Score:1)
Well, that, or not opening unexpected spreadsheets emailed to you by random strangers.
Or not have friends who do the same thing.
And they'll tell two friends... and they'll tell two friends..
Re:OO to the rescue? (Score:4, Informative)
The problem with this strategy is the the emails are often times from people you know. These don't normally spread because some spam farm is emailing random addresses, but by having an infected person's computer email all the addresses in their address book (people you know) a copy of the virus. So basically the advice should be to never open unexpected spreadsheets from ANYONE, not just random strangers.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, in this case, the attacks have mainly been directed at specific targets. Nevertheless, if someone does decide to add the old "email to everyone in contact list" functionality to this, you're still safe as long as you ignore any strange emails with spreadsheets attached, even if they come from someone you know.
Either way, as an Excel user, I can't say I'm going to lose any sleep over this one.
Re: (Score:2)
Or until someone implements functionality to "infect any spreadsheet on the local machine"...
That way all it takes is for someone you know to be infected, and the next time they send you a spreadsheet for whatever reason it's infected.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, people you know. For example, per my antivirus software the last XLS document on this page;
http://www.insurance.mo.gov/industry/forms/index.htm [mo.gov]
has MS08-057 exploit in it. My local state government.
And we all know that the "From" field in emails... (Score:3, Insightful)
... is a reliable indicator of who sent the email... ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
... is a reliable indicator of who sent the email... ;-)
Well, even if it appears to come from someone you know, it's not that difficult to avoid.
Here's a test. Would you open the attachment if you received the following email from your mom?
From: Mom
Subject: info
Attachment: morgage.xls
here is the info you reqeusted
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Since this scored a 5, it may be helpful to define random strangers and compare the relative threat they pose with the other types. Being a simple soul, it had already occurred to me to avoid opening attachments from unknown sources, but this new level of complexity has me intrigued.
Perhaps I'm being pedantic, in which case, I'm sorry. ;)
Re: (Score:1)
Good thing I only know very specific strangers.
Re: (Score:2)
Or if your on a corporate network where you have file shares, not opening any file on the public file shares incase another user has been infected and spread it to public shares...
Or not opening expected spreadsheets from trusted sources because most malware tries to send itself to addresses found in your address book or inbox...
Adobe is having a party (Score:2)
Pewwww, finally Microsoft comes to the rescue and takes the heat from us, as always. Bob, send the excel team a cake.
Dupe submitter (Score:2)
Second dupe today from nandemoari going to infopackets.com.
Someone's fishing for traffic here.
Re: (Score:1)
So why does Secunia have 861 OSX vulnerabilities listed? And if "pretty much" all the problems have been external why does Apple release patches so frequently? Do they patch other peoples code?
Re: (Score:2)
application or OS flaw .. (Score:1)
They can do better, here's proof. (Score:4, Informative)
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/935865 [microsoft.com]
They have the code to do this securely... but can't implement it because users want the features which allow security holes. Disable macros and probably internet connections too, convert the file, then open it. Look at all the "issues", which are essentially MS saying these are dangerous (but still in the design).
business risk of Open Source .. (Score:1)
"That's not to say that commercial software isn't without risks, but any flaws on commercial applications tend to get patched a lot faster than on open source, as the vendors producing the software have a lot more to lose than an open source programmer,"
"New variant of Conficker worm [cnet.com] circu
meta-Dupe (Score:1)
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/25/024211 [slashdot.org]
Yet another case where a document has blurred into an application, the way Windows blurred from a WM to an OS.
DONT CROSS THE STREAMS! Curse you von Neumann.
A Test Case? (Score:1, Funny)
I work with security and would love to know how to craft such files for, *cough*, academic reasons. Any hints?
I wonder... (Score:2)