Microsoft's Open Source Guru Faces Tough Fight 432
coondoggie writes "Microsoft's Sam Ramji is like a turkey knocking on Thanksgiving's door. Ramji has the unenviable task of stretching his neck out into the open source world as Microsoft's representative. On top of it, his employer has preheated the oven with years of hubris, sleights of hand and broken promises.
Ramji's Sisyphean task was evident last week in Portland at the Open Source Conference (OSCon) and will likely be fuel for chatter at next week's LinuxWorld gathering in San Francisco."
So welcome them in.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Microsoft is good at winning the game when people are agressive towards them. Which I know its very easy to get hostile towards them. But they are somewhat lost when another group is their host and they are not in control. So we should be welcoming, give them a drink of the kool-aid and treat them like one of the gang. Its going to be hard and we'll have to keep an eye out for deception, but I think we should start playing nicer with them and hope that they do the same. Perhaps Microsoft would see the light and become friendlier to open source and open standards. Unlikely, but so was getting Excel working under Linux through Wine if you asked someone 10 years ago.
In the end, open source is simply a better model for software development and its a lot more impervious to threats than proprietary software is. Businesses just don't get that. In a business, the software focus is on making money. In open source, the software focus is on quality and empowering the end user. In the end, open source and the user will win. Heck, we're already winning, Microsoft is interested in open source (regardless of the reasons).
Don't throw arrows. Be diplomatic.
Re:So welcome them in.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Don't throw arrows. Be diplomatic.
You're right, that would be ineffective without a bow. Throw spears instead.
Re:So welcome them in.. (Score:5, Funny)
Don't throw arrows. Be diplomatic.
You're right, that would be ineffective without a bow. Throw spears instead.
No. Throw chairs!
No, no.... (Score:3, Insightful)
I hear what you're saying, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em!" But I really think we can beat 'em. Have you tried the latest Ubuntu?
HAVE you tried it? (Score:4, Informative)
Looks serious. HAVE you tried the latest Ubuntu, or even the second latest?
If Joe Sixpack knew his computer could be fast, dead reliable and simple to use while still doing everything his Windows box can do (this is Joe Sixpack and not Joe Gamer), all for the cost of:
- One blank CD
- Learning to click on the flaming fox instead of the blue E
- Learning to clock on the purple bird instead of the little green man
- Learning to click on the road cone instead of the colorful Play button
- Learning the names of the apps in the OpenOffice suite
he'd drop Windows like a hot potato and never look back. My whiny Paris Hilton wannabe sister bitched and moaned at first when I switched her to Ubuntu (after she stole one of my partly-patched XP gaming laptops and turned it into a spyware and virus-ridden BSODing mess within 36 hours) but after a while she learned how it works and now she doesn't complain, and the laptop hasn't hiccuped once.
Re:HAVE you tried it? (Score:5, Interesting)
* Learn to manually set the MTU of the ppp0 interface when connecting to a pptp VPN at the office since the VPN setup effectively ignores the MTU setting. Although this makes certain things just not work properly when the remote end ignores requests to fragment, it is not a priority to fix apparently.
* Figure out how to make ndiswrapper load the wireless interface drivers on his laptop. Even though there are wireless drivers for the wireless nic, they don't work. You have to download the Windows package, extract the ndis driver from it, and then follow some cryptic commands to get the ndiswrapper kernel module to load it.
* Teach his 4 year old kid how to enter the keyring password so that the wireless WPA key can be retrieved when the kid's gaming computer starts up that is down in the kitchen with a wireless card. Though ubuntu has a nice option of auto login (since kids that young might not know how to type a username and password in) so that he can put links on the desktop that the kid can click to go to Barney's website and such, auto login doesn't count as entering the password. So he can figure out a way to put a script hack in where he has to put in his password IN PLAIN TEXT to get around the prompt for the keyring password.
* Try using open office and embedding pictures in a word processing document, only to find that Microsoft Word (which everyone else at the office uses) either can't load the pictures or the pictures come out scaled to thumbnail size. But, you have to export it in like Word 95 format to at least get the thumbnails.
* He can continually wonder WHY THE HELL DOES FLASH KEEP LOCKING UP FIREFOX? Seriously, after a few LiveLeak or YouTube videos, you have to force-quite the browser and reload it. WTF?
I use Ubuntu 90% of the time now, but I'm no Joe Sixpack. The open source community has its own hubris that is, quite frankly, annoying.
I mean, seriously, all the open source people are rabidly anti-microsoft and insistent that anything they can do OSS can do as well or better. All this forcefully exerting how idiotic it is to use MS products culminates in end users finally moving over to OSS. Then....
They inevitably have problems or encounter bugs. They ask, sometimes not nicely, the project community to fix the bugs, only to be met with: "This type of attitude really irks me. You get all this stuff for free, you can fix it yourself or pay someone to fix it."
It was YOUR agenda that brought the users here, make them WANT to stay here rather than giving up and going back to Microsoft. Ubuntu is nice and useful as long as you know how to deal with these little usability quirks and annoying bugs. Supporting non-developers on OSS still SUCKS.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I usually insert a picture from a file (screenshots). But, really, this is an example of a usability problem. To an average user, they save a word document and it serializes the pictures in the document. If I'm saving the OpenOffice document as a Word version X document, it should work the same way.
To a developer, breaking links makes sense. To an average user, their reaction will be, "What is a link?"
As for a test case....well, working from memory here. I creat
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
If Joe Sixpack knew his computer could be fast, dead reliable and simple to use while still doing everything his Windows box can do
I just set up Ubuntu two nights ago, with the latest version and all. Joe Sixpack has no hope of getting Ubuntu running on his machine. Savvy power user *maybe*.
Installation was easy enough, and thankfully was something very well done. Not too much technical mumbo-jumbo, very straightforward. Nice.
Except wireless didn't work. The kind of hackery I had to do to make it work would be beyond even most power users. If I wasn't a dev I'd have no idea wtf I had to do to get wireless working. And honestly, wireles
Re:HAVE you tried it? (Score:4, Insightful)
Cant speak for the_mink, but I have.
I still, throughout my entire life, have never been able to get any form of Linux running on a laptop I've owned (either personally or through job).
Not once. And these are all high end corporate class machines from Dell and HP. Like the ones that hundreds of millions of other corporate types are using and buying daily.
Ubuntu 8.04 LiveCD wont even run on this laptop. The standard install disc NEVER works on any machine I've ever seen, apparently because the 'splash' screen is a problem. The first step after install from the alternate disc is always to edit grub to disable the splash. Otherwise you never get a screen, and cannot even pull up a terminal. How could the splash option in grub boot result in a terminal not being available? This is not something I understand.
I mean what the hell. Didnt these guys ever hear of a generic software VGA driver, like every other OS on the planet has to fall back on?
And wireless never works. Ever. On any laptop I've ever used.
Even when I recruit the local Linux expert, he spends many hours, and then just shakes his head and gives up. And on the current laptop, thats with the Intel 4965agn, which has a freaking open source driver from Intel. It still doesnt work. And the approach taken to saving WPA keys, where you are expected to enter them in every time you connect? Thats just terrible.
On the flip side, I've had huge success with using Linux running as a guest in VMWare to serve some specific services. Works pretty darn flawlessly, actually. I've had a copy of Kubuntu running on VMWare server on my windows laptop host for years, for various purposes, and it works great. But on real-world hardware? Never.
At the moment Linux and other Unices are purely for deep specialists. And this doesnt mean the millions of rabid 'I use linux' people out there, who rant and rave about how awesome Linux is and how bad Windows is, but then have no freaking idea how to do simple things like switch a linux box from static to dhcp. I mean its just sad.
So it certainly has its place, and 'its place' is growing yearly. But its nothing even remotely like what you're suggesting, at least in my experience.
Re:HAVE you tried it? (Score:5, Funny)
Do you have any idea what people are really doing with Microsoft products that simply can't be done on Linux.
Spreading NIMDA and Slammer?
Re:So welcome them in.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Stop throwing around arrows, spears, chairs :)
Throw a BS-Filter :)
Seriously, every time one of the big closed source giants come around to open source, the find a "rebel" from their ranks, the person looks like the ultimate "open source fanatic" from in their own ranks.
Usually the person is a sleek, charming bs-machine. His goal is not to get the company into a open-source-everyone-happy state, he's a peacemaker, a showman. They tell you how much the company wants to move toward open source and how hard it is to do it. They give out empty promises and while they are at it, they actually "consume" you :)
Stop wasting your time on empty hopes about them coming to opensource world and taking you to nirvana. Get to the nirvana yourself, you'll beat them for sure.
Resistance is futile, You will be assimilated -- this did not come from any borgs from out of space, this came from microsoft, oracle, corel and god knows whom else.
my -0x42 cents.
Re:So welcome them in.. (Score:4, Funny)
No. Throw chairs!
Who is the current chair at Microsoft?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I know the perfect amazon tribe [slashdot.org] to shoot arrows!
Re:So welcome them in.. (Score:5, Funny)
I think the the weapon you are looking for is an axe
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:So welcome them in.. (Score:4, Insightful)
I think we should start playing nicer with them and hope that they do the same.
That's what Neville Chamberlain thought, too.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And if they're far more intelligent and well-resourced and were just deciding whether we were worth working with or squashing, we just fucked ourselves.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Empowering ourselves, you dolt. Jeesh! It just happens that by empowering ourselves, we have an opportunity to share that empowerment with others. It just happens that the cost of sharing is near zero.
You are correct. Anything Microsoft has to offer should be rejected, out of hand, sight unseen. I don't happily work with known liars, hucksters, cheats and felons. You should not either. Microsoft has proven themselves untrustworthy time after time after time. History has shown that anything they offe
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Odysseus has left a wooden horse! Victory is ours!
Re:So welcome them in.. (Score:4, Insightful)
These analogies fail on me and you both obviously thought you were clever, and they were easy to make. However they are just wrong.
Open source doesn't really have an hierarchy "to take". Its obvious that traditional software businesses are having trouble adjusting to the new paradigm. Its amusing to watch these businesses try to fight it. If you want to use war analogies, it more like Japan facing the atomic bomb. What could it do against such a new force it new nothing about?
Probably the same thing! (Score:4, Funny)
Great analogy. I think MS is going to do EXACTLY what Japan did facing the atomic bomb:
Implode, be incinerated, be eviscerated, bleed to death, slowly fall apart from radiation, and gasp desperately for a few more breaths of air, ultimately surrendering. Have you tried Vista?
Re:Probably the same thing! (Score:5, Funny)
Implode, be incinerated, be eviscerated, bleed to death, slowly fall apart from radiation, and gasp desperately for a few more breaths of air, ultimately surrendering.
...And then become a worldwide cultural phenomenon for animation and video games?
but.... (Score:3, Funny)
.... still be very bad drivers.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
What could it do against such a new force it new nothing about?
Don't you mean "gnu"?
Re:So welcome them in.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:So welcome them in.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Oh, you wish you were.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Guys, you are missing the point. Microsoft, a corporation, has repeatedly shown that they have their own interests in mind (i.e. 1st goal of the corp is to make a profit). Their altruistic side is severely lacking in most aspects.
I may "play nice" but I'll never trust them again.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I would like to nominate this as the most fantastic, most brilliantly understated put down on Slashdot ever.
Stupid semantic unfunny "LAWLZ fucking adults ROFL ive nevar done that lolz" jokes can die in fires.
Re:So welcome them in.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Maybe, but consider, hypothetically of course, the good that could be done if MS' interests could be aligned with ours.
The secret to good diplomacy is to make others want the same things you want, to show them that your way works for them. You will *never* get someone to stop acting in their own best interests, but you may get them to realize that your way *is* in their best interests.
Think about it: why do you use FOSS? Because you consider it to be in your best interest. Why do people write software and give it away? Because in some way it's in their best interests.
Altruism isn't a permanent motivation in the vast majority of cases, and it isn't a business motivation at all. However, if you consider altruism in the equation while determining how to go about achieving your goals, you wind up with something like FOSS -- helping others while you help yourself. There's no reason that your business's primary methodology has to be absolute winner-take-all cutthroat competition.
That's the thing MS and lots of other companies don't understand. FOSS doesn't mean giving away the store. It just means going about things differently and having a different mindset when you make your plans. It's possible to have a thriving business while peacefully coexisting with your competitors.
That said, it's incumbent on MS to stop the cutthroat tactics and move into peaceful coexistence mode. It's not us who are trying to use the legal system to wipe them out. We're not Goliath in this story -- we're David with stones and slingshot in hand. If Goliath wants to talk peace, that's fine, but he'd better put down the sword first, AND the dagger he's got hidden in his robe, and start talking sincerely.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't contribute to FOSS through altruism. I contribute to show my coding prowess and express my creativity and inventiveness. I wrestled in high school and college, because I wanted the glory of winning the competition. I'm building an airplane, because I like building things. If I just wanted to fly, I could buy a used airplane and go flying much cheaper.
If I were running a business, I would contribute to a project that my business needed, with the hope that others would contribute and the s
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I agree, and that's my point in a nutshell. You show off your prowess in a way that benefits others in the process. You work for your own self interest in a way that's constructive to the FOSS community.
MS, through their tactics, has isolated itself from a huge group of people. At this point, we have no need of MS simply because they've been so hostile and we've created alternatives in response. If they were like Sun, IBM, RedHat, MySQL, etc, and contributed where it makes sense for them to contribute, Micr
Re:So welcome them in.. (Score:5, Funny)
Don't be a Nevile Chamberlain. (Score:4, Insightful)
I think we should fight Microsoft, not Sam Ramji. We should just make it clear that Sam works for a company with a monopoly conviction and a long record of dirty fighting.
Microsoft's joining Apache, to a great extent, as an anti-Linux play. They still can't stand the GPL, it's too fair for them, but they think they can take some of the oxygen from Linux by being more of a platform for Apache-style software. And the Apache license lets them "embrace and enhance".
Don't give up now, folks. Only your vigilance and your willingness to point out when Microsoft plays dirty tricks will keep them from getting away with even more of that.
Bruce
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
From what I understand, the apache license and the gpl are compatible now - in the sense that something licensed under Apache2 can be brought into GPLv3.
Nevertheless their past actions will make it very difficult for open source developers to have any kind of trust.
If we create great PHP support and we create excitement among PHP developers then there is opportunity for Windows Servers, Ramji said.
:: shudders :: ...
Just what the world needs, more windows servers
Re:Don't be a Nevile Chamberlain. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You're missing something. With LGPL, Microsoft's additions don't have to be under LGPL. They can be under a proprietary license. They don't have to come with source. And when you convert the LGPL code to GPL, you can't convert the proprietary part. That's how LGPL differs from GPL.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
You're not looking. Start with the web server and browser. The first ones were Open Source. If you want something more recent, look at Ruby on Rails. Much faster than Java as far as time-to-market is concerned. Look at Linux. Runs on an incredible number of architectures, from watches to supercomputers. Nobody knew you could do that before. Look at the Open Source development paradigm itsel
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Says the person posting on the Internet.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You're confusing what GPL says and does with what Richard Stallman thinks but did not put in the GPL. GPL's effect is that software that is linked to the GPL-licensed code - not all software - must be GPL or you must negotiate another license with the copyright holder. MySQL and other companies use GPL in a dual licensing scheme, where people who want to link in non-free software pay for the privilege, and those who want to put their co
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
"Without obligation" pretty much isn't going to happen unless the item under discussion is public domain. Probably the most important obligation you are under as a developer is the Visual Studio EULA, here [google.com]. Section 3 especially has a tremendous pile of obligation related to building stuff with its DLLs.
You've got to read those licenses! You are p
Re: (Score:2)
So the choice is supposed to be between being aggressive towards Microsoft and starting to "play nicer with them"?
How about a third option: wake up.
Don't throw arrows. Be diplomatic.
Good advice. Diplomats are not known for their trusting souls.
Re:So welcome them in.. (Score:4, Insightful)
No, it's on building your own project which replicates another piece of software exactly but under another license or with some tiny change. Then pissing everyone off on your mailing list and having 3 groups of developers fork on you, each taking the direction you "should" have taken. after the ego cools off all the mini projects release hacked scripts to allow migration, which no one can get to work. When users complain you tell them to RTFM, and that it's all very simple and if they don't like it they can use MS products (which they end up doing)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm afraid that right now I have no choice but to agree.
For instance, a few days ago I have decided to help the KDE project by picking up the translation; the Croatian translation team has been inactive for the past year or so.
I have found several people willing to translate, too; in addition, I would undertake to make it all consistent by designing a (semi-)controlled language, as it would combine well with my graduation thesis.
When it became apparent that my views on translation were rather different fro
Re:So welcome them in.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Could be that Microsoft is still paying him to keep the KDE group 'inactive' and to fight off people like you who want to help.
Re:So welcome them in.. (Score:4, Insightful)
In the end, open source is simply a better model for software development and its a lot more impervious to threats than proprietary software is. Businesses just don't get that. In a business, the software focus is on making money. In open source, the software focus is on quality and empowering the end user.
Or... more likely they do get it. (At least to the extent that you reveal in your post.) OSS is a better model for software development, but that doesn't mean it's a better business model. A business's goal isn't (and at least a large part of me says "shouldn't be") quality and empowering the end user except to the extent that they make business sense, and it is (and "should be") to make money. (There are limits to the "should" parts of that; e.g. violating the law or human rights or something like that.)
So is closed or open a better business model? I have no idea. But I suspect neither do you.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
In the end, open source is simply a better model for software development and its a lot more impervious to threats than proprietary software is.
Yes.
Don't throw arrows. Be diplomatic.
Why? What possible reason is there to be "diplomatic" towards Microsoft? The company has been rude and arrogant towards anybody they have dealt with. They have cheated Americans out of many billions of dollars through bundling, tying, and their illegal monopoly. Was Microsoft "diplomatic" about the companies and jobs they de
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
So we should be welcoming, give them a drink of the kool-aid and treat them like one of the gang. Its going to be hard and we'll have to keep an eye out for deception, but I think we should start playing nicer with them and hope that they do the same.
"If your enemy is hungry, give him food to eat; if he is thirsty, give him water to drink. In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head, and the LORD will reward you." - Proverbs 25:21-22 (NIV) [biblegateway.com]
I've always liked that passage. :-)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Perhaps Microsoft would see the light and become friendlier to open source and open standards. Unlikely, but so was getting Excel working under Linux through Wine if you asked someone 10 years ago.
Are you saying the WINE project has had help from Microsoft? I wasn't aware of anything like that going on.
What possible use is their in having MS on your side anyway? All they've demonstrated themselves to be good at is writing consistently shitty software. They're a joke. All major business held back from using Vista "until SP1 comes out", and then by the time that it did come out, most still didn't see any benefit in it. I'm quite happy that some of the world has shown that it understands that the latest
Re:So welcome them in.. (Score:4, Insightful)
So we should be welcoming, give them a drink of the kool-aid and treat them like one of the gang.
That's what they want, man. I say let them rot in the courner.
No! They are not expecting to like the kool-aid. They are expecting to get their foot in the door and have some leverage to dominate the open source community. I realize that. But we have to give them enough kool-aid so that they start liking it.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Can I pee in it first?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:So welcome them in.. (Score:4, Funny)
Might want to think before you troll (Score:2, Interesting)
Yeah. Apache, Firefox, MySQL, Asterisk, PHP, Wikipedia, BIND, Postfix: all COMPLETE FAILURES.
Utter crap that nobody ever uses, right?
Re:Dear Know-Nothing (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
What would be so bad about Microsoft running the Government? Think of all the synergies!
: Blue screen of death penalty.
: Zune for Government: finally, a user base!
: Just announced for MS Government 2009: 10% tax breaks for everyone! (Details of software may vary from description, including variance in the tax cut by negative 50%.)
: President Emeritus Gates
: MS Government Home Edition (voting restricted to school board elections)
: All Mac and Linux users are welcome to participate in government. However, MS
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I know you will hate me but, in all seriousness, I had actually hoped Bill Gates would leave Microsoft and go into politics. I have my reasons and I'll keep them short.
A country is about a lot of things and one of the most important things is about keeping the majority of the people happy. Honestly? The vast majority of Windows users are quite happy. We, here, probably wish that they weren't but they are.
There comes a time when a government must do things that go against their normal routine. Bill would lik
Shades of Gray? (Score:5, Interesting)
I'd like to know what it would take for Microsoft to actually back up those claims with proof in a public forum. But that's probably a question for Steve Ballmer, since he's the one who seems to flog the patent FUD.
OTOH, I have contracted at Microsoft (once as a dev doing an intranet site for a testing lab, once being the editor in charge of a couple of sections of the MSW homepage), and it's an interesting culture there. It's not the Death Star with Ballmer walking around, periodically strangling people with his mind just to show who's boss.
In a company that big you can't escape the control freaks and evidence of The Peter Principle [wikipedia.org], but you also have people there like my manager on the intranet site contract, who was the best manager I've had in the 23 years since I started having managers. For all the greed and arrogance people here like to claim go into Microsoft products, there are a lot of people who are there because they love what they do and Microsoft gives them the opportunity to get paid well for doing it. I met some awesome people at Microsoft, people I really respect.
I switched to Mac to avoid Vista. I use NeoOffice instead of MS Office. But I can say that despite some of the aura of badness Microsoft gives off as a company, there are people there who are truly dedicated to the company being a good citizen, putting out good products, and getting along with others. The people who give Ramji a hard time really haven't given him a chance.
Re:Shades of Gray? (Score:5, Insightful)
Hasn't Microsoft trained us over time with a reverse skinner box approach, by offering cooperation and failing to deliver on the open principles they committed to?
Microsoft has earned the negative attitude they receive with years of practice, hard work and dedication. It's like posting at -1. It takes time to dig yourself out of it and Microsoft can't just create a new account and start over.
If Ramji really wants to be taken seriousyl, he should be prepared to be received poorly for some time to come and take that in stride.
Re:Shades of Gray? (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm sure there's tons of really great people working at Microsoft. It's easy to put a kind face on Microsoft when you think of the examples of nice people who work there. But when it comes to business, Microsoft is not that nice guy.
No, that's Apple (Score:5, Funny)
It's not the Death Star with Ballmer walking around, periodically strangling people with his mind just to show who's boss.
That's what Apple is like.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
It's not the Death Star with Ballmer walking around, periodically strangling people with his mind just to show who's boss.
That's what Apple is like.
Ballmer in Apple?
Things are worse than I'd thought.
*dumping stock*
Re:Shades of Gray? (Score:5, Insightful)
I think now is an appropriate time to say... (Score:2, Insightful)
"Sucks to be you!"
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Wow... +5 Insightful goes really cheaply these days. I was aiming for +3 Funny :P
Sisyphean? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I like it. Sisyphus has a nice... playful ring to it!
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I thought the same thing. Sisyphean makes is sound like he just can't win. Of course, that might be accurate.
Given that Microsoft has traditionally played the eagle[*] to FOSS' Prometheus [wikipedia.org], I'd guess that there are more than a few people who don't want Microsoft ever to win.
-----
[*] Microsoft actually thinks it's Zeus in this legend, but that's a whole 'nother story.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
militant, defiant, rebellious (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:militant, defiant, rebellious (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:militant, defiant, rebellious (Score:5, Insightful)
what exactly does open source deliver?
It depends who you are:
End users:
It provides software at no cost. Now, some users may need support, which will cost them, but the chances are they don't need support on *all* their software (i.e. they might want to be able to phone someone up when the operating system breaks, but they are happy with having no support for their word processor.
Also, my experience as a software developer tells me that Open Source _code_ is usually of higher quality than proprietary code - it may not be as obvious to the end user as it is to a developer but I do honestly believe that in (most but not all) cases Free software is more secure, stable and feature-rich.
Another bonus, especially for businesses using the software, is that if you find that you need a feature you can go and contract a developer to write it for you instead of being held to ransom (or ignored) by the original vendor you got the software from.
Small to mid-sized computer businesses:
Businesses can use Free software to provide solutions to their customers - they can make money by selling the services, rather than the software.
For example, if a customer asks for some kind of system you have 3 options:
1. Write the system from scratch.
2. Licence a proprietary system.
3. Use a Free system.
Now, (1) is probably going to be a lot more expensive, so that is out. (2) and (3) are more or less comparable at this point, so long as they both have the features you need. Some time later the customer can come back and ask for some new feature - if you originally picked (2) then you may be screwed, whereas if you picked (3) you can add the feature and charge the customer for your time.
The "services" business model has, since the dawn of time, also had that subscription model that MS wants.
Huge software monopolies (e.g. Microsoft)
This is a lot more problematic - the Free software business model prohibits the abuse of a monopoly position, purely because someone else is always free to compete with an identical (or improved) product but with a lower cost or more favourable contractual terms. If you are producing Free software, you can't just put all the competition out of business and then stop improving your product for years (much as MS did for things like IE) - you will always have competition and staying ahead of the competition takes constant effort, but is good for the consumers as they see constant improvements instead of stagnation.
If Microsoft completely embrace the Free software business model, they _will_ lose their monopoly position, so I can't see them doing that until they have already seriously lost that position anyway. Similarly, from a business perspective they need to be careful with interoperability since they don't want to promote the idea of replacing Microsoft products with competing ones. But what they do want is to enable Microsoft products to interoperate with the competing products in situations where people would be using the competing products anyway (and thus would avoid the MS products if they didn't interoperate).
Microsoft's monopoly position sucks for MS's competitors, MS's customers and MS's competitors' customers (who struggle to interoperate with MS's software and customers). However, their monopoly position is good for _them_ and they will protect it at all costs - to do so, they need to walk a very fine line.
However, even if MS decided to 100% embrace Free software (which, as mentioned above, they won't), they would still have a hard fight convincing the Free software community to accept them. This is because they have spent years time and time again making promises to the Free software community and then stabbing them in the back at the first opportunity - it will take them a lot of time and effort to prove that this isn't just another example of this behaviour (if indeed it isn't).
A philosophy is not an answer.
Pure philosophy is not the answer, but that philosophy has survived for a long time because it gives real, solid benefits for a lot of people.
Re:militant, defiant, rebellious (Score:5, Funny)
Corporate entities will run all over us and then want to be friends. Must we lie down and take it or resist and be defiant because we are the movement? I know what I am saying is controversial but I say it with a reason.
You rebel! An open source person with an anti-corporate message!? I don't believe it. You must have massive balls. This reminds me of the time when Greenday stood up against the evils of Bush. A pop-punk band speaking out against conservatives was pretty progressive and unusual at the time, but they to pererviered and finally won the community to their side. Your fight will be long and hard, but I hope that in the end you too convince the wider open source community that Microsoft is the devil.
You are a brave soul to be so bold with such a hostile pro-corporate crowd. Standing up for what you believe in, with no fear that the open source community might respond with hostility and skepticism is a bold act. I salute you for going against the grain and taking such a controversial "Microsoft is bad" stand. If only there were more brave men like you.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
That has to be the worst spelling of "persevered" I've ever seen.
Re:militant, defiant, rebellious (Score:5, Funny)
Re:militant, defiant, rebellious (Score:5, Funny)
I think you misspelled "incoherent". Just goes to show that you shouldn't always rely on the spell chequer for everything.
Re:militant, defiant, ignorant (Score:3, Insightful)
Microsoft is a single entity in one sense, but it is also a community, or a political organisation, if you will, comprised of lots of people with differing agendas and varying levels of "evilness". Adhering to a militant stance as a stated policy and assuming defiance as a fixed position is not just very lazy, it is short sighted, counter-productive and stupid.
Sure, it makes everything easy now. You don't have to think about what your "enemy" is doing, just reject everything as bad because it comes from Red
why is this a problem? (Score:5, Interesting)
why can't the entire free software crowd just stand up and say "No thanks", we aren't interested in what you have to say.
if you think that M$ will ever help free software in any meaningful way, you obviously haven't been paying attention over the past couple decades.
there is good news in this though. M$ is obviously noticing that every day there are people installing linux who used to use window$. They know that linux on the desktop is closing the gap and many other companies stand to profit from it. After years of pretending OSS didn't exist, or worse yet, attacking it in underhanded ways, they don't have a piece of the action. This whole M$/oss thing, just means they are realizing there is a chance that maybe OSS really IS the next big thing.
My prediction is that a huge company with unlimited resources like google will package up a nice, distro, call it something flashy, advertise the hell out of it, and give it away for free. I am well aware of the options that already exist, but the average person is not. It takes flashy marketing to capture the market.
how can M$ possibly compete with other companies who come in at a price point nearly $0, with a better product, a good ad campaign, AND profit margins of nearly 100%? They can't. Someday the house of cards will fall. They know it, they think, they can adapt by getting involved with OSS. They will fail because we hate them.
Keep your friends close... (Score:5, Insightful)
Oh Poor Ramji (Score:5, Insightful)
Microsoft wants to kill Open Source and don't ever forget that.
Hey Ramji, after all your employer has done to promote Open Source like backing SCO and buying off ISO, why don't you just crawl under a rock someplace and quit wasting our air. Just go cash that big check and live in some kind of peace and harmony with your bought-off ass.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, to be fair, a lot of MSR stuff isn't available. A few researchers there put out a paper [microsoft.com] that talked about recording a trace from a binary's execution, one of the applications of which was a time-traveling debugger a la the Omnipotent Debugger for Java. I looked, but I couldn't find it online.
MSR is probably the best industry research lab in CS (at least that publishes; Google I'm sure has one that rivals it, but Google rarely publishes) on par with a darn good university, but I wouldn't call them OSS-
Army of Darkness & Open Source (Score:2, Funny)
They're coming. (Score:3, Interesting)
They are coming. Their are quite a few of them, but they are coming. Remember what I said about "Preventing the last year of open source and Linux?" While Linux is strong now, do realize that we got a break.
In Vista, I expected the Harbinger of Linux's Doom. I expected another Windows 2000. I was pleasantly surprised how bad Vista turned out.
We got a break, we got lucky, and Linux will survive to fight another day, but the monsters are still out there. At this point, Linux needs to focus on combating OSX. Apple is as lethal a threat as M$ is.
I call bull sh:t on this, they don't want to play (Score:5, Insightful)
Look at the guy they hired to run their Linux Lab, Hilfe or something like that is his name. They made him up to be a friend to OSS but then he got put in charge of their anti-linux marketing or the likes.
20+ years of watching these guys tell me it is business as usual for MSFT. Windows is their baby and nothing is going to threaten it. Linux and OSS is too compelling for many of Microsofts customers so Microsoft must get its hands dirty and shove its way into that area enough to figure out how to pull those customers back to Windows.
Their business is Windows and maintaining that products position. Software which runs on Windows and some other platform is a threat. This is how it has always been so why would anyone think they are playing any other game? Twenty years folks, twenty years. Just look at ODF and MS-OOXML for proof of how far they'll go to protect their position.
this new guy should not be given the time of day IMO.
LoB
No trust without dropping "patent" claims (Score:5, Insightful)
We should not trust Microsoft, no matter how nice their liaison to the FOSS community, until they drop their claims that Linux distros infringe their patents. Either they need to specify WHICH patents or withdraw the claim entirely.
If we give in to anything less, we're selling out and lending cred to M$, not to mention allowing them to make money off of FOSS through their "licensing" program.
Microsoft at it again, news at 11 (Score:4, Insightful)
Actions. (Score:3, Interesting)
Until there are actions made by Microsoft that benefits open source in general everything Microsoft does in OSS should be taken with a large dose of skeptisism. Its all PR.
As long as their goal is to obliterate any competition, kill partners any time it gives a benefit and screw their customers over they shouldnt be allowed to be in our community. While we play nice they spend their time trying to come up with new ways of controlling or killing the open source movement.
Open Source is Ready (Score:3, Funny)
The open source world is also ready to fight if necessary.
Stallman is waiting. [xkcd.com]
I, for one, deeply respect him and the new MS. (Score:3, Funny)
microsoft is not exactly good or evil (Score:3, Insightful)
if you give em hard proof of a more profitable future in OSS,they will run to it faster than a young puppy chasing a rubber ball.
Bullshit. (Score:5, Insightful)
They have broken the law, cheated on business partners, used underhanded tactics in the OS to stifle competition.
That has nothing to do with capitalism. Capitalism does not work without the respect and adherence to the rule of law, and needless to say, one is immoral because one chooses to, not because one is a capitalist.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
So why do the most successful companies keep falling foul of those laws, and companies which are morally scrupulous tend to make somewhat lesser profits?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I was there when he was being grilled at the final keynote. Honestly, O'Reily (the OSCON sponsor) had to ask people to *STOP* asking the MS representative tough questions... but he even gave the harder questions a go. Not everyone wass going to be happy with the answers, but... they won't ever be, right? It's coming from the Ebil Micro$oft, afterall.
MS is changing with the times, as any successful corporation really must. There are even some pretty compelling business reasons for this, I'll wager. For
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
you mean you've never noticed them joining competing industry committees before? They usually do this for a few reasons and all of them have to do with making sure they know how to fight the product.
They do it to get inside numbers on things like install base and download numbers. This lets them know how much they need to throttle up or down marketing funds to fight the product.
They do this to slow down the progress of the committee for obvious reasons. It's pretty easy to do when you've got billions of buc
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)