Cybercrime Organizational Structures Evolve 70
An anonymous reader writes "The latest findings of a report explore the trend of loosely organized clusters of attackers trading stolen data online being replaced by hierarchical cybercrime organizations. These organizations deploy sophisticated pricing models, crimeware business models refined for optimal operation, crimeware drop zones, and campaigns for optimal distribution of the crimeware. These cybercrime organizations consist of strict hierarchies, in which each cybercriminal is rewarded according to his position and task."
Can't be true! (Score:3, Funny)
Coming the fall to HBO (Score:5, Funny)
The Sopr0nos.
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
mods = fags.
Re:Coming the fall to HBO (Score:4, Funny)
As someone who read that as (Score:1)
My first thought was "Sweet justice."
Good news (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Good news (Score:5, Funny)
Hierarchial organizations are much easier to attack.
This type of organization will be even easier to attack than usual, because there's no loyalty on the internet and no possibility of physical retribution.
http://www.realinternetmafia.com/ [realinternetmafia.com]
They're not going to break your legs.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
O RLY? (Score:2)
That being said, organization breeds efficiency
There's a documentary on that very subject you should see.
It's called Office Space
Re:Good news (Score:5, Funny)
I'm suddenly reminded of the line from the movie "Sneakers."
Cosmo: There I was in prison. And one day I help a couple of older gentlemen make some free telephone calls. They turn out to be, let us say, good family men.
Martin Bishop: Organized crime?
Cosmo: Hah. Don't kid yourself. It's not that organized.
Re: (Score:2)
Gee...for the good old days of "criminal cooperatives".....
Re: (Score:2)
Gee...for the good old days of "criminal cooperatives".....
The new way doesn't sound like a lot of fun to me. If all you get is bureaucracy and a pay scale, you may as well work for the government.
I wonder if there are any special fringe benefits for the rank-and-file cybercriminal.
Spam Reorg Notification? (Score:5, Funny)
Are they going to start sending notifications of their organizational change through spam, just like my current corporate VPs like to do through e-mail?
"The organization changes announced by Boris Brezgnoff represent a positive signal to all of our stakeholder groups - investors, clients and especially zombie PC owners - that we are repositioning our african operations to pursue accelerated growth. These changes will facilitate the cross-pollination of expertise we have developed across Nigeria. These changes will also enable further refinement of our global delivery strategy as we increase intra- and inter-business unit communication and pursue cross-business unit opportunities.
To deliver on this strategy and in recognition of their contribution to our past growth, the following leadership changes will be effective as of July 15, 2008:
Ivan Lebovich will assume the position of DDOS Extortion Vice President, Southern Hemisphere. Ivan's deep understanding of all of our services - particularly our Tier 2 and Tier 3 business - and his ability to develop strong relationships with key accounts will help expand our penetration of clients based in the southern hemisphere. His passion for the global delivery of our IT services and his excellent ongoing relationship with our primary nearshore USDS (Untraceable Spam Delivery System) accounts - South Africa and Malaysia - ensures the effective management of this critical delivery centre. I personally want to thank Ivan for his many years of dedicated service to the FIRM (Free Internet Russian Mafia) and look forward to working with him as he takes on this promotion to business unit leader."
The FIRM responds... (Score:1)
First, it's important to clarify that as far as I'm aware, we're not in the business of compromising networks or gaining access to other systems without just cause. When there is a clear threat to security, we then employ legal and just means to deal with that threat. Also, I'm not able to discuss specific methods that we might or might not be employing but only speak in terms of concepts and capabilities that we should have in order to be successful conducting operations in cyberspace. If you have insights
it's actually Lt. Col. John Bircher, (Score:1)
head of the U.S. Army Computer Network Operations (CNO)-Electronic Warfare (EW) Proponent's Futures Branch, in a recent slashdot interview.
Both "organisations" (the military & the criminal) seem to be "cybering-up" massively.
FeeBay? (Score:2)
And kneecapped, obviously.
Website protection rackets (Score:2, Interesting)
If you don't pay up, we'll vandalize your page, buy your domain out from under you and unplug your server.
Re:Website protection rackets (Score:4, Funny)
Sorry, Viacom is still waiting on the ruling which will allow them to do this.
oh, and at least TFA doesn't lump p2p in there.
Re: (Score:2)
That search page of yours looks mighty combustible... with all them dry links lying around...
Like just a match in the wrong place and it could go up like nothing. We wouldn't want that now would we ?
Re: (Score:2)
I still cannot figure out why the threat of vandalizing a server works better than a threat of breaking both wrists.
RTFA (Score:5, Informative)
Now I know why I don't generally bother reading these articles. This one has to be one of most cursory and pointless articles I have read in a long long time.
Re: (Score:1)
Prior Art (Score:1)
This is a Pratchett reference (Score:5, Insightful)
The study of crack dealers mentioned in Freakonomics showed a heirarchy similar to any US corporation, with the lowest level getting about the same hourly rate as in McDonalds. There really is no hard and fast line between organised business and crime, just degrees of criminality ranging from (say) welfare friendly food providers on the West Coats down to crack dealers. As Enron and Bear Sterns have shown us, size and visibility is no guarantee of legality.
sophisticated pricing models (Score:4, Funny)
extra annoyment (100% cpu) for zombie computer owners: +$20
tarpit iptables rule workaround: +$30
24/7 phone support: +$300
lunch with PharmaMaster: $5m
Well DUH! (Score:1)
Organized crime (Score:3, Insightful)
And it's always been that way.
The booze runners of the 20's and 30's to the crack dealers of the 80's, and everything before and after.
They have pretty much corporate org charts.
I guess it's human nature to follow the rules/leader. Some just choose different sides of the law.
Sounds like Uplink (Score:2, Interesting)
Does anyone remember Introversion's little hacker game, Uplink?
You worked as a (mostly malicious) contract hacker for a corp called Uplink, creating and editing identities for clients, stealing and deleting data, and transferring large sums of money in exchange for a bounty proportional to the difficulty/danger of being caught.
Looks very similar to this situation.
Just checked - you can still buy Uplink on Steam for $10.
Re: (Score:1)
Thanks for the tip - the mods were the best part!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah but the steam version doesn't work with the mods that modify the binary. Fortunately it is possible to get them working though if you don't mind lowering your neuromancer rating a little if you get my drift.
another garbage press release (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
What I want to know is.... (Score:1)
Put them in charge! (Score:2)
The last law abiding corporation I worked for promoted based upon blood lines and/or an employees ability to hang from the ceiling by their lips.
The central role of Google (Score:4, Insightful)
Google is an integral part of today's online scams. Google provides material support to scammers, and helps collect the money.
Google's proliferation of low-security services makes it easier for scammers to operate, and to hide. If they had to buy those services from a hosting company, there'd be a money trail to follow back to the source. Using Google's free, unauthenticated services makes it easier for the operator to conceal their identity.
It's full-service evil.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Surely you're being facetious. Thank god we have free and anonymous services on the web.
What, you'd prefer to live in a world where you couldn't be anonymous online?
Your argument soudn like you're saying this is a bad thing and everything everyone does online should be id verified.
Fuck that.
We're going to have a hard enough time preventing that from happening thanks to the fascism creep going on in our sick system as it is.
Gangs & McDonald's (Score:1)
Reminds me of Freakonomics, in which Levitt discusses how drug-dealing gangs' organizational structure mirrors that of McDonalds.
The invisible hand (Score:2)
Run Windows (Score:1)
What are these crooks thinking? (Score:1)
Huh? (Score:1)
Thank you Microsoft (Score:1)