Facebook Widget Installs Zango Spyware 137
BaCa writes "A malicious Facebook Widget actively spreading on the social networking site ultimately prompts users to install the infamous "Zango" adware/spyware. The tremendous success and lightning fast expansion of Facebook empowered the social networking giant with an impressive user base. Needless to say, in a digital world where web traffic equals money, such a user base attracts spammers, virus/spyware seeders, and other ethic-less online marketers like honey would attract flies."
Facebook evolved to fast (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
jeffk
Re: (Score:1)
"like honey would attract flies" (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Redundant)
Re: (Score:1)
"Flies around shit, bees around honey"
From the song "Holy Smoke".
Without exception... (Score:5, Insightful)
'caring' - imageogram
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty things, if you're good.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Pretty things, if you're good.
Microsoft Paint is fun, you get to draw things.
Pretty things, if you're good.
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty things, if you're good.
Microsoft Paint is fun, you get to draw things.
Pretty things, if you're good.
AND YOU GET TO SHOW OFF, because the whole point is that it's a social thing. Which, I shouldn't be surprised, is not readily understood by the
Obligatory (Score:5, Funny)
http://xkcd.com/357/ [xkcd.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Wouldn't install for me (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
It's times like this I'm glad I have a Mac, as I can continue to stalk people that barely know me without risk of getting a virus. =P
Oh, for god's sake (Score:2)
Vista proves what I've always suspected: even Microsoft can't set up a secure, usable Windows system without pissing me off on a continual basis with warnings and prompt
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
why are all facebook widgets so retarded? (Score:1, Insightful)
Social networking sites are like second grade classrooms.
Re:why are all facebook widgets so retarded? (Score:4, Insightful)
The reason it's like a second grade class room is because majority of users are of that mentality now. Just look at most of the "groups" now. Maybe they existed and I didn't notice before but all my groups were rather sane, now they're "IF U JOIN THIS GRUP WORLD PEACE WILL START!"
I've been on facebook since the beginning. And every minor improvement seemed to rock. They added photos. I was able to share photos in one place with most of my friends. I could invite friends over to a party with out having to e-mail every one. Yes, sometimes in college you don't get the opportunity to SEE all your friends every day.
And then the flood gates opened. The Developer thread was flooded with "HEAY I LOVE FACEBOOK CAN U MKE IT SO MUSIC PLAYS LIKE MYSPACE." People would kindly remind them that the whole thread was FOR developers. People could make 3rd party apps and it seemed pretty good because all the 3rd party apps were external. Then came the day that they let those 3rd party apps on everyones website. Then it just went to hell.
Thankfully Grease Monkey and scripts like:
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/11992 [userscripts.org]
This exist.
Which is why I maintain 2 accounts. My 'professional' account. Uses my work address. All my college friends and people I know well. You can't find it anywhere. You can't search for it by name. Even if you know me I have to add you. Then my "Hi I just met you at the bar and I'm going to add you" account. Basic info. Searchable. Etc.
Too late (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Too late (Score:5, Interesting)
Whoever injected that spyware application will no doubt create a new developer account, and upload some variant of "Secret Crush". Blocking a particular application or a particular developer account is a short-term solution. I can only guess that more and more people are going to exploit Facebook apps for adware, spyware, phishing, identity theft, etc. Facebook will then be playing yet another game of "Internet whack-a-mole" where they try to block applications based on signatures, block developers based on IP address, and so on (with usual countermeasures of automated code variation, proxies, etc.). As we've seen from spam, viruses, spyware, and phishing, such games reach a stalemate where a certain fraction of users are becoming victims at any given time (typically the less savvy users, I suppose).
Personally I think Facebook should do a better job making the risks of third-party applications clear. The little "confirm that you want this application" question has already become so routine for most users that it means nothing to them. Moreover, the tight integration of third-party apps into the Facebook environment, though visually pleasing, leads most users to believe that the applications are written by and endorsed by Facebook. In fact, the code runs on third-party servers and those third-parties have access to profile data once you accept the app. Most Facebook users are surprised when you tell them this. And it's not always easy to tell who actually wrote a given application.
I think we all saw this coming, and I'm surprised Facebook didn't put in more safeguards to curtail the use of the app framework for spamming, phishing, and social engineering.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
The widget is "Secret Crush" (saving you a click) (Score:5, Informative)
The widget in question (according to TFA) is "Secret Crush". The app asks you to complete several steps, including signing up 5 of your friends and installing a tray applet (containing the "infamous "Zango" adware/spyware") from Zango's site.
Re:The widget is "Secret Crush" (saving you a clic (Score:4, Informative)
Facebook is going to hell in a handbasket. They should never have opened to "anyone with an email address"; that's just asking for trouble. At least they're making money, right?
Re: (Score:1)
intended consequences (Score:1, Troll)
Am I the only person left? (Score:5, Funny)
From reading the press it seems to be some sort of web site where you upload all your private stuff for other people to see. I've never seen it though.
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28694 [theonion.com]
Don't feel bad, I don't get it either. (Score:4, Insightful)
I only went and checked it out a few weeks ago, after not being able to stand all the hype any longer.
I can't figure out what it's for. I've said as much here on Slasdot before, and was told that basically it's a mechanism to find/keep in touch with friends.
It's kind of like "classmates.com", except it's free.
I went and tried it out. First of all, they want you to use your real name. Like you noted, your "private stuff". Myself, I am seeking to
Once you have an account, there is very little to actually
I don't have any long lost friends to look up, and the couple of names I did plug in didn't get any hits. All of the people currently in my life that I want to keep up with I currently keep up with by other means, like email, telephone, or face-to-face.
I still don't understand the appeal of these "myspace" and "facebook" social web sites. What they really look like to me is an html-based web page creation utility, that allows people to create a personal web page without having to pay a hosting fee.
Since most ISPs these days give you a 5MB or so space where you can make a little web page if you want, I don't know why people don't just use that, except I guess they don't know how to make web pages. So MySpace, Facebook, etc., are like mini web-page software wizards to help you make a web page. Since all the web pages are centralized on one "server", they are thus also easily searchable / linkable.
If I wanted a web page to post things about myself, I'd go register a domain and some web hosting services and make one. I guess Facebook and MySpace are for people who don't want to go to the trouble.
Re:Don't feel bad, I don't get it either. (Score:4, Insightful)
Hmmm... well, if you used a fake name, then maybe all your former friends did too. The site only works if people use their real names. Facebook is exactly that for most people - kind of like classmates.com and Friends Reunited. It enables the maintenance of casual friendships without having to write/phone explicitly.
If you think about it, this is how most casual friendships work - I don't specifially talk to John down the hall at work to catch up, I might bump into him in the coffee room, see he's got a new shirt, find out it was his birthday yesterday etc. etc.. Just seeing and bumping into someone lets you stay in touch without it being an effort. Social networking sites let you do this. Email works for people you really want to stay in touch with, and chat forums work for a bunch of people who want to discuss the same topic(s). On Facebook I can find out that Fred who I went to school with is into a particular band too, and if there's a couple of other guys from school 10 years ago maybe a group of us could go to a gig. Nothing serious, nothing important, but if you like to stay loosely in touch with a whole bunch of people then it works really well.
Explicit maintenance of friendship... (Score:3)
>The site only works if people use their real names.
I really don't have any former friends. There is one guy I've lost track of over the years, but he never kept a phone (his girlfriends kept calling getting him in trouble with his live-in girlfriend) and he hated computers so I doubt he's on the web anyway. But other than him, I don't have any long-lost buddies I'm trying to keep track of. I never had friends in hig
Re:Explicit maintenance of friendship... (Score:4, Insightful)
Let me give you an example of a "casual friend". You know that guy at the bar who tells you about his band, and it sounds cool, but you don't want to get his phone number or give out yours just so you can check out their next show. The solution here is he can just tell you what his bands myspace is, or facebook, or whatever, and you can get the info there. No need for feigned friendships when you find out his band sucks.
Re: (Score:2)
Sometimes if you just pretend that you like people long enough, you actually will, then you fin
Re: (Score:2)
Thankfully, for those who prefer to know a lot of people without actually having to spend time with those people getting to know them, social networking sites
Re: (Score:2)
Uh, because that's what internet BBS forums are
>Unless, I dare say... You're a bit lonely?
Hah. Look, I'm married and I have a wonderful daughter. This in itself would be fulfilling. But in addition I participate in medieval re-enactment and consequently hang out with hundreds of the same group of folks once a month, and I
Re: (Score:2)
I agree! (Score:3, Insightful)
>center of interest is one of the most worthless activity i've ever heard of.
My sentiments exactly. It also smacks of voyeurism to me. Maybe that is part of the appeal?
Re: (Score:2)
I think there is an element of that for some people. I suppose the flipside of voyeurism is genuine but casual interest. When I see people I was once close to have got married, had kids, got the job I knew they were dreaming of when we were 17 it gives me a warm fuzzy feeling. If that sort of thing doesn't bother you then I can see why you wouldn't be interested. Personally I find I don't have the time or perhap
Re: (Score:2)
>100 or so people who I have probably been fairly good friends with in the past 15 years
You see, I think that really sums up the problem for me, and explains why social networking sites don't appeal to me. I don't think I've had but perhaps 10 people I've been fairly good friends with in the past 15 years, and I keep in regular touch with all but 2 of them. The idea of having 100 or so fairly good friends
Re: (Score:1)
definitely worth keeping in touch with people outside your core group of friends, even if its just to build up business opportunities. each to their own though i suppose.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Facebook's core feature is the 'news feed', which basically shows what your friends have been doing on facebook, or what they've set their status to be, a little like twitter. Here's a snippet from mine:
Guy A started playing a game: Mass Effect
Girl A misses Guy A.
Girl B left the group The American Sandwich Society.
Guy B and Guy C are now friends.
Girl C is no longer listed as single.
It also al
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Sorry, no. The purpose of Facebook is to make money.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Check out my post here... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
the way I see it there is all sort of game-like application you can use with your friends. most are about "make believe" that you did something with them. It's good light-hearted fun. now if you'll excuse me I'm just getting my baseball and will be off your lawn in a second.
Re: (Score:1)
Generation gap (Score:2)
After reading the trivial things you get to keep track of from the post just above yours (I.E., guy B leaves the American Sandwich Society), I gather that this sort of things gives you very trivial data about people - things you just don't really need to know or keep track of.
When I was younger I had time for such dalliances. But as an adult with a 50+ hour work week, a wife and a child, a house, cars, and the rare time out for hobbies and gaming, I jus
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
One of it's most useful feature is that you can search through people at your uni who've signed up, you can search for people who are doing the same course as you, you can get enough background infor
Re: (Score:3)
I can't figure out what it's for.
It's for organizing parties.
Since most ISPs these days give you a 5MB or so space where you can make a little web page if you want, I don't know why people don't just use that, except I guess they don't know how to make web pages.
Because the point is the social network.
Anecdote: So this girl I know in meatspace asks me if I'm coming to her party, I don't know what party she meant, we discuss the fact that I'm not in her facebook friends, the following day we digitize our friendship, and I finally see the event page (limited to her friends) with all the relevant details and a handy "coming/not/maybe" RSVP system.
You get to see who's going to the party, who isn't, and the whole thing is done with a nice c
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
This is where I would pull out a pencil and get the details of when and where the party was. I suppose it is marginally easier to say, "Oh, go check out my facebook page for the details" so you don't have to write anything down, but it doesn't seem to be
Re: (Score:2)
>Anecdote: So this girl I know in meatspace asks me if I'm coming to her party, I don't know what party she meant...
/that/ huge of a thing to me
This is where I would pull out a pencil and get the details of when and where the party was. I suppose it is marginally easier to say, "Oh, go check out my facebook page for the details" so you don't have to write anything down, but it doesn't seem to be
Well we didn't have to stop the social event to find pen, paper, and to write things down, have her spell it out over the music, etc.
It seriously was a huge improvement over the regular party planning procedure.
Re: (Score:2)
(clicks http://images.slashdot.org/neutral.gif [slashdot.org])
Re: (Score:2)
I don't do facebook, youtube or any RSS. I am too paranoid and just don't trust 'pushy' media.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Tag issues (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
And yes, I used preview. I think programming in PHP just greatly diminished my grammar this morning.
Personal responsibility -- don't install untrusted (Score:4, Insightful)
Facebook has nothing to do with the existence of this vulnerability. In fact, the browser-based app model explicitly is nice because of the sandbox effect, where such apps are very limited in what they can touch on your local machine. But when you convince people to break out of that sandbox by installing a local app, you can certainly kiss your computer goodbye.
--
Our microcontroller kit. Your gcc compiler. Learn digital electronics. [nerdkits.com]
scoble (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This could never happen here... (Score:2)
It's a good thing that these "spammers, virus/spyware seeders, and other ethic-less online marketers" would ever take advantage of of the /. user base!
Oh wait... [slashdot.org]
Yaz.
firefox extension + script for facebook users (Score:1, Informative)
There's XSS-like vulnerabilities too (Score:1)
For those who don't know how Facebook works, basically when one person installs an app, the app will pester them to request their friends also install it. A friend of mine installed it, which sent me a request that appears o
Re: (Score:2)
What you are describing is a bit different, and I just want to make sure I understand it right.
Re: (Score:1)
For those who don't know how Facebook works, basically when one person installs an app, the app will pester them to request their friends also install it.
You need to speak with your friends.
When you install a Facebook application there is a choice at the end of the process whether or not to spam all your friends with an invite to use the application. You can't avoid Facebook itself placing a 'Person installed application Foo' into your friend's news-feeds. However you can set preferences on your own news-feed to avoid such items appearing, using the 'x' button beside the item.
I'm on a Mac, so wasn't affected.. but.. (Score:1, Redundant)
FUD alert (Score:1)
http://blog.zango.com/PermaLink,guid,94c0e12c-c69e-484f-81b8-b8b58953d71b.aspx [zango.com]
(summary: users are clearly told they are downloading something, so what's the problem?)
And try to keep up with the times,
ethicless? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Really? (Score:1)
Re:Ethic-less? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Perhaps they would use the word "unethical" though.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Ethic-less? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:What is "Facebook"? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Since the web pages are on a centralized "server", they are easily indexable and searchable, which is nifty if you want to do things like go looking for long-lost friends or people who share similar interests.
Myself, I don't get the appeal.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I guess so.
Steve
Re: (Score:2)
You can choose to be insulted by this or not but it's the truth.
Sounds like just the opposite... (Score:2)
It sounds just the opposite though. People don't seem to be using Facebook to socialize, they use it to digitally eavesdrop on the mundanities of people they no longer keep up with very well.
Except for the examples provided where people use it as a meant so schedule physical meetings, it doesn't sound like real, honest-to-goodness socializing, it sounds like a substitute for it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes it does. It's called life, and we as a society should stop putting so much futile effort into working against it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
You could have a website, full control over ALL the html, the ability to run php/mysql stuff, links to anything you want, a neat little script to let your friends leave comments....it'll cost you very little, I pay £60/yr for one of my websites and I get backups, halon fire suppression (which I couldn't even legally have in the UK), superb support etc etc
OR....you could get a free but very limited version of the same plus adverts, spam
Re: (Score:2)
You shifted the goalposts on that one. Being smug about stupidity-with-consequences or laughing at it, is an entirely different issue than what you responded to. I agree there is no reason to feel superior or gain a sense of schadenfreude (sp?). On the whole, stupidity is kind of sad, and we all behave stupidly sometimes. However, saying stupidity deserves its results is a tautology, to my mind. If stupidity didn't have harmful results, then I don't see how a behaviour c
Re: (Score:2)
I took the advice of your SIG.
Thank you. I sincerely mean that.
I don't disagree that stupidity has harmful effects, my issue is with saying "stupid people deserve what they get". I think that saying things like that is promoting an attitude of smugness and I'm-better-than-you. Going by that logic, I really shouldn't try to educate stupid people, because they deserve the consequences of their stupid actions. Should we shield people from dumb mistakes? Of course not, we don't want to live in that kind of nanny-society. However, that do
Re: (Score:2)
Ian