Santa IM Worm Hits AOL, MSN and Yahoo 149
elmtree95 writes "CNET News reports A Santa Claus worm is attempting to trick America Online, Microsoft MSN and Yahoo instant-messaging users into clicking on a file that delivers unwanted software to a victim's computer.
The IM.GiftCom.All worm attempts to dupe IM users into thinking an acquaintance has sent them a link to a harmless Santa Claus file. IM security vendor ELMTree Software has released a patch to their ChatPatrol (www.chatpatrol.com) product to address this issue."
I bet it isn't as good as: (Score:4, Funny)
Presents (Score:2, Funny)
Gee, not even Santa Claus loves Mac users. (Score:2, Funny)
As a Mac user I feel really lonely.
Santa has less love for Linux users... (Score:4, Funny)
Convincing the Windows crowd that we are compatible is such a pain...
Re:Santa has less love for Linux users... (Score:2)
C.a.r.b.o.n. It's called Carbon.
Re:Santa has less love for Linux users... (Score:2)
I'd much rather Cocoa.
Re:Santa has less love for Linux users... (Score:2)
The article is reporting what is actually a WINDOWS VIRUS without actually mentioning this vital background detail. According to the posting, its an "IM" problem. Heh.
The drawback is that us Mac/Lunix users have to click on the link anyway to check that it doesn't affect our platform -- just in case. Another drawback is that Microsoft gets away with not having their product explicitly associated with the virus.
Having this kind of gloss-over slip through has become typical
Re:like the firefox headlines (Score:2)
I agree!
Not to be left out... (Score:2)
Re:Santa has less love for Linux users... (Score:2)
Wine Is Not an Emulator!!!
Re:Santa has less love for Linux users... (Score:1)
We don't have to be alone... (Score:1)
Re:We don't have to be alone... (Score:1)
Re:We don't have to be alone... (Score:1)
Well... it does and it doesn't. IE is inherently less secure because it allows for the nasty buffer-overflows and assorted scripts to run. Once the system has maliscious code running within userspace, anything can happen. For instance, users running 10.3.6 or earlier are in imanent danger of having their passwords stolen, since you can have UNIX dump the hashes from any privclass.
However: the fact still remains that attacks from within the system are much more difficult and less likely to succeed on a
Re:Gee, not even Santa Claus loves Mac users. (Score:1)
Re:Gee, not even Santa Claus loves Mac users. (Score:1)
gotta love free advertising (Score:5, Insightful)
'nuff said
Re:gotta love free advertising (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:gotta love free advertising (Score:1, Insightful)
In addition there are pagerank spammers like **BeatlesBeatles that appear so frequently despite user outcry that backhanders are again the only logical reason.
Slashdot : Press releases for gullible nerds, stuff that makes us money
Re:gotta love free advertising (Score:2)
I suggest Slashdot to revoke that user account. I know it can't be deleted, just change suckers password.
Dear Santa.w32... (Score:5, Funny)
-- AIM user
Don't you worry (Score:2)
Re:Dear Santa.w32... (Score:1)
Re:Dear Santa.w32... (Score:2)
How does it work? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:How does it work? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:How does it work? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:How does it work? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:How does it work? (Score:1)
Santa's Motives (Score:5, Funny)
better watchout
lpr why
santa claus town
cat
ncheck list
ncheck list
cat list | grep naughty >nogiftlist
cat list | grep nice >giftlist
santa claus town
who | grep sleeping
who | grep awake
who | egrep 'bad|good'
for (goodness sake) {
be good
}
Dang, I guess he really meant the last three lines!!
Re:Santa's Motives (Score:2)
santa claus <north pole >town
I forgot to submit it as plain text
Re:Santa's Motives (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Santa's Motives (Score:2)
SantaClause/: No such file or directory
rm -rf Christmas_hopes_and_Dreams/
Sorry to break it to you like this kids
Re:Santa's Motives (Score:2)
North Pole (Score:1)
How does he survive there wearing red clothes? Potential prey would spot him from miles away.
And now this worm thing..
I don't know - there are just so many things that just don't seem right with this fellow.. - But not to worry: thanks to Bush [ap.org] there shouldn't be a problem finding what this guy is up to.
Ho ho ho. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Ho ho ho. (Score:2)
Re:Ho ho ho. (Score:1)
American (might be capital, but I graduated from one so I am not sure)
public school
We don't capitalize our public schools because they are not a proper noun unless we use the proper name for the school, but good shot!
Try again next time.
It's a /. story... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
User's fault again (Score:2, Flamebait)
what happens is you get an IM message with a link. if you click it, it's your fault when it downloads.
When it downloads it is still just nothing but a file on your disk. If you accidentally click it you have a chance not to run it. Second luck, if you like.
If you then open that file and become infected, it is your own fault.
It is like being warned two times not to put your tongue on a 110v wire chasss. If you still do it you have nobody else to blame.
As they say, take the
Re:User's fault again (Score:2, Informative)
regardless, it looks like just another silly aim worm (albeit with a festive holiday flair).
Goes without saying (Score:2)
"A Santa Claus worm is attempting to trick America Online, Microsoft MSN and Yahoo instant-messaging users..."
Which would be about as hard as falling off a bucket.
Re:User's fault again (Score:1)
Re:User's fault again (Score:2, Insightful)
Yet they don't think it is their fault when they get a virus/worm/spyware.
Unlike the ignorant Linux fanboys on
Nice plug. (Score:1, Redundant)
Bad information (Score:1, Insightful)
Um, no. It delivers unwanted software only to hapless users of microsoft OSes. Those running OSX, Linux, BSD etc are completely unaffected.
Technically You're Wrong (Score:5, Insightful)
Sorry but if you want to nitpick, be prepared to receive the same.
Re:Technically You're Wrong (Score:2)
Re:Technically You're Wrong (Score:1)
Re:Bad information (Score:1)
While technically you may be correct, you're still a troll for trying to bash Microsoft on this.
Re:Bad information (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:Bad information (Score:2)
Somewhat hard, yes. The slashdot summary does not mention Windows, so the rest of us have to dig for this vital detail. That makes the incident hard to understand as reported by slashdot because the editor didn't check story ba
Okay, so I'm a Scrooge (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:Okay, so I'm a Scrooge (Score:1)
What's next? (Score:5, Funny)
2 cents,
Queen B
Scammers and Spammers (Score:1)
Microsoft provides this URL for users to immediately get rid of the latest Malware: Remove Malware [microsoft.com]
ironic? (Score:2, Funny)
I don't think that word means what you think it means...
Re:ironic? (Score:1)
Re:Scammers and Spammers (Score:2)
start--->run--->mrt---->ok
Re:Scammers and Spammers (Score:2)
I tried that link from somebody else's XP box; it didn't work, XP was still functioning after a reboot.
Watch out! (Score:3, Funny)
You better not cry,
You better not chat,
I'm telling you why:
Santa Worm is coming to town!
ChatPatrol (Score:1, Interesting)
Elmtree must be the stupidest company I've seen. They rip off gaim, and then write a post to slashdot: the place where the users are most likely to call them on their infringement!
Re:ChatPatrol (Score:4, Informative)
Does it install a clue for users silly enough to download and run executables being pushed by anonymous strangers?
"IM security vendor." How pathetic.
Editors, please don't put spam stories like this on the site. That's all it is.
Re:ChatPatrol (Score:2, Flamebait)
That screensot? That just shows that they work with Gaim [chatpatrol.com]. It's an IM security/encryption program that runs transparently basically as a proxy from what I can tell. They don't have an IM client themselves.
Oh, wait... write first, comprehend later. I'm the first to get on someone ripping off open source, but this ain't one of those times, and all it would have taken was using your brain before you typed to
Re:ChatPatrol (Score:1)
Will it run under wine? (Score:1)
Say it with me people (Score:2)
Don't click on links in strange IMs!!!
Does anyone listen? No. You know who gets these things? Sad and lonely people, and at this time of year, they are especially vulnerable.
Re:Say it with me people (Score:2)
That sounds an awful lot like "Don't open strange email attachments!!!" I do both and I have no problems. My secret?
Re:Say it with me people (Score:2)
Of course it's more secure; no one writes worms and viruses for Macs since there are so few of them.
Re:Say it with me people (Score:2)
Just like no one writes worms and viruses for iPods because there are so few of them.
Re:Say it with me people (Score:2)
Re:Say it with me people (Score:2)
Re:Say it with me people (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Say it with me people (Score:2)
Re:Say it with me people (Score:2)
#include
int main() {
while (1) { fork(); }
return 0;
}
affects everyone on pretty much all systems.
Re:Say it with me people (Score:2)
#include <unistd.h>
Re:Say it with me people (Score:2)
What about Google? (Score:1)
I can't believe there's an article on /. that mentions Yahoo, MSN, and AOL, but not Google. They must feel so left out.
Did someone finally impose a Google limit on /.?
Re:What about Google? (Score:1)
Re:What about Google? (Score:2)
Human stupidity strikes again (Score:1)
This really isn't any different from the morons who message random people telling them to download sub 7.
It can't just be me.... (Score:3, Funny)
Oh no (Score:1)
How much does a story like this cost? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:How much does a story like this cost? (Score:2, Interesting)
This is nothing more than an underhanded marketing attempt, piggybacking on a genuine virus alert. OOoo...the shadiness...
Re:How much does a story like this cost? (Score:4, Informative)
This is nothing more than an underhanded marketing attempt, piggybacking on a genuine virus alert. OOoo...the shadiness...
Re:How much does a story like this cost? (Score:2)
Re:How much does a story like this cost? (Score:2)
IM Logic withholds details of Santa Claus worm, un (Score:2, Interesting)
late comers... (Score:2)
Yes that should definitely fool the 3 people who still haven't watched the movie into clicking on the link...
If you are dumb enough to fall for this (Score:1)
Someone will do it (Score:1)
There always is one stupid person who starts it all.
i call for a "You Must be this smart to use the internet" Logo whenver you use the internet!
and on that note, cue the jingles....
A duplicate already?? (Score:1)
It just gets worse and worse *g*
Silent delivery of Linux to the desktop, I think it's the way forward!
PS. No I didn't RTFA
ask first! (Score:1)
Dear Elmtree95 (Score:1)
Check http://www.ostg.com/ [ostg.com]
It will also prevent hundreds of security professionals, system admins reading slashdot to hunt you down if you coded the lame worm or not.
I know you can call it paranoia but submitting a worm story to slashdot promoting your product can make people wonder how far you would go.
Also people concerned about that worm: Update your virus databases and get latest security patches for your OS and IM Application.
Re:WTF? (Score:4, Funny)
(Yeah, I never have it installed, either)
Re:WTF? (Score:2)
and even then, you would have to be near brain dead to run it.
what are these people thinking... i think mcafee/norton/etc should get together and make some basic '10 rules to avoid viruses' bs, maybe if we add an annoying jingle to it, these people might get it. WTF
Re:WTF? (Score:3, Informative)
yeah, WTF? (Score:2)