Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Security IT

CMP Acquires Black Hat 59

Posted by ScuttleMonkey from the too-many-hats dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Tradeshow and publishing behemoth CMP Media just acquired Black Hat for $10m.. It's ironic timing, because CMP also runs the Computer Security Institute tradeshow which wraps up in Washington DC today. There couldn't be a larger difference between a boring, institutional show like CSI and a small, independent event like Black Hat Briefings. Hopefully the corporate approach of CSI won't crush the life out of Black Hat."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

CMP Acquires Black Hat More

CMP Acquires Black Hat

Comments Filter:

  • Protection of larger corporate umbrella (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Tontoman ( 737489 ) on Wednesday November 16, 2005 @06:47PM (#14047993)
    Perhaps being part of a larger corporate community will come in handy next time Black Hat tries to expose another vulnerability. A few months back, Cisco got ticked off at the exposure they got courtesy of Black Hat. It wasn't until a few weeks ago that they released the fix. http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/03/161 3226&tid=172&tid=218 [slashdot.org]

  • CSI (Score:4, Funny)

    by iced_773 ( 857608 ) on Wednesday November 16, 2005 @06:50PM (#14048008)

    I myself have never watched CSI but from seeing the commercials and considering the number of spinoffs I would hardly call it a "boring, institutional show."
    </dumbjoke>

    • Re:CSI (Score:2, Funny)

      by hackwrench ( 573697 )
      Yeah, fashon these daya... I mean, can you believe somebody buying a black hat for $10m to celebrate a season wrap?

  • I don't think so... (Score:4, Funny)

    by suitepotato ( 863945 ) on Wednesday November 16, 2005 @06:50PM (#14048013)
    Hopefully the corporate approach of CSI won't crush the life out of Black Hat.

    I've never found that to be the case. Slow pacing, sudden plot twists, and overused "straight from the headlines" cliches maybe...

    Oh.

    Er, yeah it might, but I wouldn't worry. I'm, uh, gonna go back to watching tv now...
    • Not to worry, let me run that through the GCMS and see what the peaks show. We'll know if that's true or not soon enough.

      (I got confused, too. Amusingly, I know all the jargon they use... I'm a science geek, which is why I like the show. Sadly, the GCMS on my campus was run on an old decrepit Windows 3.1 machine. I hope HP/Agilent is using something more up-to-date by now! Can't imagine they're not.)

  • SecurityFocus (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward
    Interesting. Back around 1999, SecurityFocus was in discussions with Jeff to buy Black Hat, but it would have been for stock options. Had he gone for it, they would have also been worth about $10 million when Symantec bought them. Jeff could have had his 10mil in 2002. I guess the stock option thing is a bit more risky than cash.
    • Stock options require banks and financial managers. Cash only requires a mattress to hide it in.
      • well 100,000 $100 bills doesn't fit under many people's mattresses... and you're also risking your money by buying something of no 'real' value 'paper' which is really only worth what other people are willing to take it for... which if the us govt were to royally screw everything up, could be worth a whole lot of nothing.
      • Without banks, that mattress full of cash is useless...well, except for sleeping.
        Wothout Finance managers, banks can't do anything.

        OTOH, you have more fingers

  • Kiss of Death (Score:5, Informative)

    by Dynamoo ( 527749 ) * on Wednesday November 16, 2005 @06:54PM (#14048050) Homepage
    CMP aquired BYTE [byte.com] some years ago. And promptly shut it down, leaving it to be a web-only publication. They have a history of acquiring other publications and killing them off. God only knows what their business model is.

    • Re:Kiss of Death (Score:5, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 16, 2005 @07:15PM (#14048184)

      I am a former employee of CMP and I can say as a company insider CMP in its current form is a disaster. To be fair it more a calamity of errors and greed dating back 1999.



      CMP was sold by the Leeds Family a wonderful philanthropic family from Long Island, NY, they bent over backward to grow the business and help there employees. For many years CMP was listed as one of the top 50 places to work on LI. It truly was a wonderful place to work. In late April of 1999 CMP was sold at the height of the boom to United News and Media (now United Business Media) via Miller Freeman for 920M USD. The Leeds family gave a wonderful gift to there employees totaling about 40M dollars and then walked away with they're 900M.



      Almost immedtiately after the purchase Miller Freeman was split up and sold in parts the largest part was purchased by VNU the dutch publishing monster. UBM also restructued selling off and stream lining offerings only to have the Tech market shit the bed in late 2000.



      During the bad years CMP was a company coasting along on fumes no direction, no vision, no ideas. Just cost cutting and layoffs it was as if the Brits UBM were playing an accounting game to regain there 920M.



      There has been some recent turn over in management at UBM and CMP but I honestly don't think a thing will change. I would imagine in the next five years CMP will be gobbled up by some bigger directionless mess of a company



      I read byte for many many years before I worked at CMP. I hated them for closing that pub down. The only consilation is I actually got to yell at the guy who did it.



      • Re:Kiss of Death (Score:5, Informative)

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 16, 2005 @07:48PM (#14048383)
        Seconded.

        In addition, while working at CMP I was also able to witness firsthand the company's tendency to let go of talented people without so much as batting an eyelash. It was truly strange. I met one guy who had been with the company for over a decade with a string of successes, but when one new magazine project failed his whole division was given the axe, him included. I chalk it up to the ongoing attempts by the CMP management to consolidate power and eliminate the "legacy" Miller Freeman people from the tech publishing division -- but even so, it just seemed like a ridiculous shame to throw away talent like that.

        But then, it wasn't all that surprising, either. Oddly enough, the most powerful people I knew in the San Francisco office were in human resources. It sounds like a joke until you actually have to work in an office where the only people who never get laid off are the HR admins, no matter what their seniority. These were people who couldn't even answer a basic question from the employee handbook during a layoff meeting, and yet somehow they never seemed worried about their jobs. It took weeks and weeks to bring new hires on board, too, even to replace key positions. When we finally managed to bring in a new editor in chief at our book to replace the one who quit, we were told by the candidate that it had taken so long because HR made him jump through countless hoops. They had told him that they were doing this because we insisted that HR should be "a partner" in the interview process. Bullshit; all we ever asked for was for HR to open the envelopes with the resumes in them and forward us the qualified candidates.

        Basically, though I can't speak for what it's like now, a few years ago that company seemed to be devolving into an administrative sinkhole of "Office Space" proportions. Nobody I know who was working at CMP during that era (2000-2002 or so) seems the slightest bit bothered that they aren't working there anymore.

        • Re:Kiss of Death (Score:3, Informative)

          by SirNAOF ( 142265 )
          I've been annoyed with CMP recently, and I only freelance for them on occasion.

          People coming/going for various reasons (I've heard more than I remember, but some were just fed up with the way things were going), shuffling things around, losing paperwork...

          Like I said, only a freelancer, but still annoyed with how they do things.
    • If they stiffle Black Hat, the speakers will just move to a new venue. "Black Hat" will die and a new conference just like it, but with a new name, will spring up.

  • Death to CMP Media - on principle (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Elrac ( 314784 ) <carl AT smotricz DOT com> on Wednesday November 16, 2005 @06:54PM (#14048053) Homepage Journal
    The first time I heard of CMP was when I got a letter telling me my subscription to BYTE was being phased out, along with BYTE magazine itself. As compensation, CMP generously offered me a choice of one of the worthless other magazines they were carrying. I don't know how long ago this was, but you can probably tell from my tone that I'm still angry about this.

    I can no longer call CMP's entire assortment of rags worthless, because there are at least one or two I enjoy reading once in a while, and which I respect. But all in all, I see CMP as one of the first behemoths of dumbed-down conglomerated corporate press. I believe CMP has done useful, unbiased, technically qualified coverage of computer-news a disservice.

    I find some small consolation in two publications: ct [heise.de] and SlashDot [slashdot.org].
  • "Hopefully the corporate approach of CSI won't crush the life out of Black Hat." Don't worry, it will. They have a long history of doing just that. I hope the Black Hat folks take the money and use it to poke behemoth corporations who release leaky software even harder.

  • Hopefully the submitter will RTFA (Score:4, Insightful)

    by winkydink ( 650484 ) * <sv.dude@gmail.com> on Wednesday November 16, 2005 @07:13PM (#14048175) Homepage Journal
    Hopefully the corporate approach of CSI won't crush the life out of Black Hat.

    From TFA:

    Black Hat and CSI will remain separate entities within CMP; both will report to Chris Keating.

  • Nice, unbiased summary (Score:5, Insightful)

    by sczimme ( 603413 ) on Wednesday November 16, 2005 @07:17PM (#14048205)

    There couldn't be a larger difference between a boring, institutional show like CSI and a small, independent event like Black Hat Briefings. Hopefully the corporate approach of CSI won't crush the life out of Black Hat.

    Well, there is a nice, unbiased summary. Oh, that's right: Black Hat is a cool, hip, and edgy conference that is sponsored by such rockin' organizations as Ernst & Young and Microsoft [blackhatbriefings.com]. w00t.

  • also does Defcon each year in Las Vegas. I've been to defcon 7 and 8 and found it to be too big and commercialized even for a "hacker" convention. Attendees at BlackHat Briefings used to receive free attendance at Defcon, and at defcon you could easily tell who the kiddies where and who were the professionals. I much prefer the smaller conventions like RootFest or ToorCon, that don't have rooms of booths or tons of script kiddies running around.
    • I much prefer the smaller conventions like RootFest or ToorCon, that don't have rooms of booths or tons of script kiddies running around.

      today's script kiddies are tomorrow's professionals.

      heaven forbid these "script kiddies" try to learn something from the pros by going to these conventions.

      get off your high horse
    • Attendees at BlackHat Briefings used to receive free attendance at Defcon

      They still do.

      at defcon you could easily tell who the kiddies where and who were the professionals

      That's not changed, though which ones were speaking is an open question. I remember quite clearly a talk from a few years ago where the speaker was attempting (and failing) to give a talk on Active Directory security...while drunk...at 9am.

    • How likely do you think CMP is to want to accept the liability of Defcon, given how little money it makes and often Defcon attendees tend to trash the hotel?

      Defcon and Black Hat have been run as one week-long conference for two very different sets of attendees. My guess is that Jeff will be less able to combine expenses and resources between the two conferences now. I'd give it another year or two before he's too busy to bother.

      -- Aaron
  • "Not as long as I am still in charge of it... which I still am. It was a big concern of mine, part of the reason it took so long to complete." -- The Dark Tangent

  • Prejudice? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 17, 2005 @12:10AM (#14049715)
    I'm typing from my desk in the Marriott Wardman fresh from attending the CSI conference. I have to say that the characterization of the differences between Blackhat and CSI is a bit overdone by the original poster. Defcon and CSI perhaps would be a better comparison for this statement. I have been to both CSI and Blackhat and both offer pertinent information for Information Security professionals in a similar format. In fact, I appreciate the corporate focus of CSI. Maybe I'm just getting old (I'm 28).

    I hate to be a troll, but I'm coming to expect this type of attitude more and more from Slashdot. It's unfortunate.
  • who saw this article as CMP Aquires Red Hat? :)
  • ...go to the CSI website and think it looked a lot like the San Diego Comic-Con website? Between the superheroes and the very very similar color scheme? Or am I just crazy?

Slashdot Top Deals

The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not "Eureka!" (I found it!) but "That's funny ..." -- Isaac Asimov

Close