Palm and RIM to Collaborate on Treo Software 71
Rayaru writes "Palm and RIM have apparantly signed a deal allowing the Treo 650 to use RIM's email software. "The partnership with RIM is unique in that it is Palm's first chance to give Treo customers automatic synchronisation with calendaring." It's interesting that the deal also includes "future Treo products with the Palm operating system." Perhaps a Treo 670 Palm version is in the works?"
Good Move (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Good Move (Score:1, Troll)
Let me guess, you're using a Palm III or Palm V device, aren't you?
If so, then I could see your point, but if you're talking about the newer kit, then I'd have to ask what planet you're on, and how you get that unstable crap to sync without crashing and requiring a plethora of hardware resets.
Re:Good Move (Score:2, Insightful)
However, the beauty of the Blackberry (with a BES sever on the backend) is that desktop sync is not necessary for mail & calendar. It's all managed at the server, happens over the air, and it's one less thing to deal with at the desktop. Add this to the Treo 650 and you have a pretty potent combination. Now, some Tre
Re:Good Move (Score:2)
Re:Good Move (Score:1)
Oh well...
It will be a great move if... (Score:3, Insightful)
If I want to play video games or watch movies, I'll go with something that has a bi
Re:Good Move (Score:3, Informative)
Note that this announcement is for BlackBerry Connect, which essentially gives Palm access to the protocols that BlackBerry devices use to talk to the BlackBerry Enterprise Server (BES). You still end up using the Treo's mail client -- the actual BlackBerry software (which is all written in Java and runs on top of RIM's own VM implementation) is not part of this deal. (That's covered by a different program called BlackBerry Built-In, which includes the VM and everything needed to run the standard BlackBerry
Re:Good Move (Score:3, Funny)
Patents? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Patents? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Patents? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Patents? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Patents? (Score:3, Funny)
Palm goes both ways (Score:4, Interesting)
No strategy beyond "Screw the user" (Score:2)
They had two options.
They could have rallied and done their best to return to the days of producing quality devices worth the money.
Instead, they chose to ride on the value of their brand name, coasting until they run out of steam.
The company is on a long, slow death march, and the quality of their recent products demonstrates that.
This is just another cyn
Re:Palm goes both ways (Score:2, Interesting)
my Treo 600 is rock solid. my Journada was nothing but a reboot moster that ended up smashed and thrown in a drawer the 12th time it lost everything just when I needed to use it.
I can not stand pocketPC devices while ever cince I switched to palm with Sony and then to the treo, I have yet to be disappointed. I even run unstable software. I watch mpeg4 videos on my treo every day and that app people mention about crashes due to the beta software.
There really is n
Re:Palm goes both ways (Score:3, Interesting)
Smart Phones just aren't a mature product yet (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Smart Phones just aren't a mature product yet (Score:2)
I'm no longer interested in anything that runs Palm OS and not particularly interested in anything from Palm. My Treo650 has been a marginal buy at best and Palm isn't interested (or hasn't shown any interest) in making
Re:Smart Phones just aren't a mature product yet (Score:1)
Yoinks... (Score:5, Funny)
Look, there are those of us looking to make a cheap, sexually explicit joke about the headline and get some (+5 Funny) love.
But guys, you're just not making it difficult enough anymore.
Re:Yoinks... (Score:2)
No, that will be the FARK headline (Score:2)
like gymnastics... (Score:1)
Good (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Good (Score:3, Informative)
Amusing considering RIMs current legal problems with patents.
Re:Good (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Good (Score:1)
GoodLink provides this as well. [good.com]
Of course, GoodLink is a third-party solution, but it works well with many models of phones, so it could be worth it if only because you are not tied down to a particular brand.
With any luck... (Score:5, Funny)
Mox
+4 Insightful? (Score:2, Funny)
http://www.zug.com/gab/index.cgi?func=view_thread
For some reason firefox won't let me cut & paste, so I hope I got the link right.
Re:Now that this deal has been signed.... (Score:2, Funny)
Support for open source calendar servers? (Score:5, Insightful)
Still comes up short. (Score:2, Interesting)
Palm has also said this was in the works for well over a year and a half, with no resolution. What gives that they fina
Re:Still comes up short. (Score:2)
The stock price must be slipping. Since they don't have anything like a stable, reliable product to release, they have to announce a new feature.
If it works as well as the rest of the Palm OS, then we can expect it to crash regularly, and a non-trivial percentage of the e-mail to vanish into the ether.
still "synchronizing" with desktops? (Score:3, Interesting)
By the way, way back I remember a slashdot article about a thing you hook up to a PDA that projects a laser keyboard onto any flat surface, and with it you can type away and it would somehow detect which non-existing keys you're hitting. Are they any good (if they're still being sold that is)?
Re:still "synchronizing" with desktops? (Score:3, Informative)
If your company doesn't install the agent on the Exchange server, then yes, you have to do it to the desktop but that's not what it was designed for.
Actually, the BlackBerry Enterprise Server (BES) came later. The devices (remember when they were called the Inter@ctive Pager?) were originally designed to sync via your desktop. The direct sync to the mail server was a later addition, and of course now that's the standard (and most reliable) way to do it.
Eric
Some BlackBerry programming stuff [ericgiguere.com]
Re:still "synchronizing" with desktops? (Score:2)
Seems likely, but I hope not (Score:1)
Re:Seems likely, but I hope not (Score:2)
The only reason they still get new customers is because of their brand name. As they spend that name recognition capital, they'll either fade away or be forced to refocus on quality.
I don't see them focusing on quality. Before long, the only reason left to buy a Palm will be "It's not from Microsoft" which is hardly a good reason to choose a product.
Soooo - when in 2006? (Score:2)
So if they want to announce this for 2006 that's fine, but are we talking "early because we're almost done" or "We're just going to do it sometime 2006 and we're just yankin' your chain again because we're really just going
big words are hard to sp3|| (Score:1, Informative)
"apparantly" is not a valid spelling. One should use "apparently".
Please, don't become just another statistic.
>>Results 1 - 10 of about 1,390,000 for apparantly
>>Results 1 - 10 of about 110,000,000 for apparently
Palm - Mail and Calendar SYnc (Score:4, Interesting)
Treo always has used Palm (Score:2)
What about the Treo 600? (Score:1)
The real loser in this (Score:1)
Chattermail [chatteremail.com]
Great little program that got me through 2 years of Treo use.
The disappearance of choice / competition (Score:1)
And, now they add insult to injury by emphasizing the Blackberry software, and if -- in the process -- they make it "har
verbificationicity (Score:1, Informative)
language is raped on a daily basis..
just remember that fist can be a verb without verbification.
-
Pardon my french... (Score:2)
Have a Treo and access to IMAP? Get ChatterMail. (Score:2)
The whole experience is pretty much just like Blackberry mail, except it is on a versitle hardware platform (heh heh heh).