Free Software Hits Back at Crackers 153
flokemon writes "This article from the Register announces the release of some free software from Backfire Security called Payback. "The software has the ability to instantly and dynamically 'trace' the IP source address - no matter how well masked - of the network attack/infection and respond by launching either a Domain Name or Mail Server flood attack in the direction of the attacker." This raises quite a few questions though, the legality of the software first, and I'm not really convinced that this would hit back at hackers more than it would hit back at infected servers." Hopefully those would be crackers will think twice now before engaging in their 31337 activities!
April fools! (Score:1, Offtopic)
I owned my roommates computer last nite...and she couldnt trace NOTHING!
Err...yes...it would have been EASIER to go into her room...but less fun
Now all day today her computer background will be changing to some funny pictures, for obvious reasons
Re:April fools! (Score:5, Funny)
Only on Slashdot men find more joy in owning a girls pc than actually owning the actual girl
mmmm.... (Score:4, Funny)
Yikes, i creeped myself out on that one. yeesh...
Re:mmmm.... (Score:2)
Re:April fools! (Score:2)
Definately not worth the trouble!
Things go sour, and you are stuck with that 24/7 for who knows how long!
Re:April fools! (Score:1)
Re:April fools! (Score:5, Funny)
Me, personally, I would've gone into her room and gained direct access to her box.
Of course that has more to do with the type of female roommates I have had.
Re:April fools! (Score:2)
Reason #1. Hot girls generally have hot friends. And lots!
Reason #2. You do something with her...she gets pissed at you later...then who is going to cook and clean?!!?
Reason #3. You have to put up with her 24/7...can you really take the risk of having a bitchy roommate?
Reason #4. She will catch you with other girls. Girls you dont live with wont find out about each other.
And the list goes on and on....
Re:April fools! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:April fools! (Score:1, Funny)
If you're a guy living with a girl, you're already screwed.
Reason #1. Hot girls generally have hot friends. And lots!
If you mean lots of hot male friends, you might be right.
Reason #2. You do something with her...she gets pissed at you later...then who is going to cook and clean?!!?
She's going to get pissed at you for any given reason, you can't do anything about this. And you need someone to cook and clean for you? That's fucking pathetic. Roommate !=
Re:April fools! (Score:1)
>Reason #1. Hot girls generally have hot friends. And lots!
>Reason #2. You do something with her...she gets pissed at you later...then who is going to cook and clean?!!?
Her hot roomates, obviously, which is why you shouldn't stay away from 'em. *rimshot*
Ha, ha... (Score:1)
Microso... oh, nevermind.
Re:April fools! (Score:2)
Re:April fools! All of you!! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:April fools! (Score:2)
I owned my roommates computer last nite...and she couldnt trace NOTHING!
She could not trace nothing...
Oh boy, you're so scr3w3d. Depending on the girl, this could be a reward or a punishment I guess (the same goes the other way around, but in this case, I'm willing to bet it'll be a punishment for her, in which case this entire reasoning becomes void [recursive error detected]).
Re:April fools! (Score:1)
Re:April fools! (Score:1)
and got moderated down, while
those who explained his joke got mod'd up...
Something's terribly wrong here.
Stupid and ugly people, go work in mines!
Re:April fools! (Score:1)
Eye for eye? (Score:1)
Re:Eye for eye? (Score:2)
Re:Eye for eye? (Score:2)
Or in this case, An eye for an eye will make the world OFFLINE.
Re:Eye for eye? (Score:1)
Re:Eye for eye? (Score:1)
Re:Eye for eye? (Score:1)
Re:Eye for eye? (Score:2)
(I'm not saying that I don't like living here -- I certainly do. I'm saying that our notions of justice can be fairly wonky.)
Hitting Back? (Score:1)
Take that *zap*
and that *bzzzzt*
aahhh (Score:1, Interesting)
backfire (Score:4, Funny)
Personally I like the one about internet cleanup day (there goes my cobweb).
As many of you know, each year the Internet must be shutdown for 24 hours in order to allow us to clean it. The cleaning process, which eliminates dead email and inactive ftp, www and gopher sites, allows for a better working and faster Internet.
This year, the cleaning process will take place from 12:01 a.m. GMT on April 1st until 12:01 a.m, GMT on April 2nd. During that 24-hour period, five powerful Internet search engines situated around the world will search the Internet and delete any data that they find.
In order to protect your valuable data from deletion we ask that you do the following:
1. Disconnect all terminals and local area networks from their Internet connections.
2. Shut down all Internet servers, or disconnect them from the Internet.
3. Disconnect all disks and hardrives from any connections to the Internet.
4. Refrain from connecting any computer to the Internet in any way.
We understand the inconvenience that this may cause some Internet users, and we apologize. However, we are certain that any inconveniences will be more than made up for by the increased speed and efficiency of the Internet, once it has been cleared of electronic flotsam and jetsam.
We thank you for your cooperation.
Interconnected Network Maintenance staff,
Main branch,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Re:Sloof Lirpa (Score:3, Funny)
Annual, actually.
OT... Re:Sloof Lirpa (Score:1)
http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/top100.html
english.aljazeera.net needs a copy... (Score:1, Interesting)
Sigh...Remember when "Cracker" meant "White Person"?
OMG (Score:5, Funny)
Re:OMG (Score:1)
WARNING (Score:5, Informative)
why dot-coms fail (Score:2)
Our aim is to exterminate all hackers and virus felons from the Internet by the end of 2004, and we have the unique technology to do it."
Even as a joke thats extra funny!
I hope their past work experience involved inventing the question mark...
April fool's posts... (Score:1)
Re:April fool's posts... (Score:1)
Greeeeat (Score:1)
Re:Greeeeat (Score:2)
It must be still early...or slashdot is using some invisible "whitespace" code to make the words change!
Re:Greeeeat (Score:1)
You sick fuck.. You're not a cop, are you?
Re:Greeeeat (Score:1)
Man.. Cracks are engaging in thirty one thousand three hundred and thirty seven activities? Wow, they really must be elite.
Attribution (Score:2)
IPS IN SPACE!!!! (Score:1)
Ha this gave it away for me
Sheesh (Score:2, Insightful)
Indeed... (Score:2)
-Website
great.. (Score:3, Funny)
The IRS is not only every American's nightmare, it is now Godless Red Thread In Cyberspace
Internet Special Ed Day (Score:4, Insightful)
Looks like today is going to be a C-Strike day!
April Fools on /. ... (Score:1, Insightful)
Somebody give me a good April Fools hoax that I will actually belive, pls.
(Gento Lunux was good and had me beating up my monitor for a bit
Free Software Hits Back at Crackers (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Free Software Hits Back at Crackers (Score:1)
Continuing the trend of *dumb* April 1 stories (Score:5, Insightful)
1) There haven't been any real articles today so far
2) All the jokes so far aren't even remotely believable
I remember the fun we had last year with some well-crafted stories. (In particular I remember a lot of flames generated over Linus quitting kernel development). The fraction of hoaxes was more than it should have been, but not as bad as this.
Anyway, about the article in question, note that backfire security [google.com] doesn't exist, nor does Archie Mendoza.
Re:Continuing the trend of *dumb* April 1 stories (Score:2, Insightful)
It's only once a year, dude. Give the guys a break. :-)
zreal stories today (Score:1)
kinda believable, I hope it's real.
[slashdot.org]
Orange Decides Against Code Signing
Old story, so nothing to do with April 1
Check this link [theregister.co.uk] 28 March 2003
I'm sure there's a few more real stories kicking that arn't on the front page of
Get a life, its just a damned joke. (Score:2)
Perhaps a bit juvenile, but its a lot better then a bunch of war stories.
Re:Continuing the trend of *dumb* April 1 stories (Score:2)
Yep... as I've said several [slashdot.org] times [slashdot.org] already... it's just like last year, when after the fourth joke everyone was annoyed. Make it fewer jokes... but make 'em good instead.
Please.
Re:Continuing the trend of *dumb* April 1 stories (Score:2)
Archimedes, toricelli, davinchi?
Okay 2 out of 3 was'nt bad
Re:Continuing the trend of *dumb* April 1 stories (Score:2)
1) There haven't been any real articles today so far
2) All the jokes so far aren't even remotely believable "
If it's a bad day for you when a day goes by that Slashdot doesn't post a story that's interesting to you, then why should anybody else be pissed? That's your problem.
Re:Continuing the trend of *dumb* April 1 stories (Score:1)
Me think they're clever and not overdone at all.
Slashdot races to the bottom to meet me, and makes me happy so I click on banner.
*drooool*...*fart*.
--
April Foo...! (Score:1)
Re:April Foo...! (Score:1)
This is the best day of the year to read /. (Score:2)
I haven't figured out how this applies in the Southern hemisphere yet, but I'm sure I'll figure it out soon.
(It never grows old for me...
How's this for reprisal? (Score:2)
goto the article (Score:2)
Dangit, Dangit, Dangit!, Dangit to heck! (Score:1)
Oh My God! They Pranked Phoenix...You Bastards!
(good one though)
Phoenix
Wow (Score:2)
Slashdot is supposed to be a serious news source. How can it be when it participates in April fool's day by putting up LOTS of silly articles. I mean one is ok, but all of them?
But slashdot isn't a serious news source, and that's its mistake. It should and could be.
Anyway, I'm even more po'd because none of the joke articles are funny! They are all obviously false and didn't even get a grin out of me because of their lame-ness. Especially this one. Hack-back software?
Re:Wow (Score:1)
Really? Since when?
Re:Wow (Score:2)
Oh wait, april fool... I get it!
WTF is the deal? (Score:2)
Yea, Just cause I am white doesn't mean... uh nevermind... =P
An April 1 Doomsday Device! (Score:1, Offtopic)
What the fuck (Score:2)
So few geeks have even the slightest sem
The Best Tip-Off wasn't the Date... (Score:1)
Payback, eh? I have a Pay Pal I'd like to pay back (Score:1)
Feet in the day, Feet at night (Score:1)
Will it be dupped too? (Score:1)
Nice one... let's see if it'll be duped later on the day.. :)
Re:Will it be dupped too? (Score:1)
William Gibson (Score:1)
Jw
Re:William Gibson/strike back (Score:1)
on a serious note (kinda) (Score:1)
Nowadays, smart h4xx0rZ should probably take a laptop and connect to the internet through some idiot's wide-open Wi-Fi router...
I mean, there's seven of those on the way I take to work, and that's just three blocks away...
Re:on a serious note (kinda) (Score:1)
Note that certain attacks are much more resistant to these attacks. (e.g. SYN flooding with spoofed IPs)
Re:on a serious note (kinda) (Score:1)
you are quite right about ISPs, BUT you really don't care when you connect through some newbie's wide-open Wi-Fi router from outside his house now do you?
No more Slashdot on April 1st (Score:1)
It's ok as long as you set the evil bit. (Score:2)
> legality of the software first...
DUUHHH!!! (Score:1)
What is this piece of metal that can talk??
Signautres are for unsigned ppl....
You SUCK (Score:1)
Thanks
bah (Score:1)
How effective could it be? (Score:1)
Doesn't seem nearly as effective as just
Here's Backfires website;
"This account has exceeded it's bandwidth quota and has been temporarily disabled. "
a few corrections.. (Score:1)
DOS Attack? (Score:1)
Had a good program like this..Anyone heard of it? (Score:1)
Backfire to WHERE (Score:1)
2. now half the Net has gone down
Yep sounds like a BACKFIRE to me.
Re:Okay... (Score:2)
And while you're gone, get hit in face with a cream pie, sit on a whoopie cushion, come across some fake dog turds, and locate a sense of humor.
Re:Okay... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Dupe (Score:1)
Dumb luck?
Re:Lame (Score:1)
Blah.