Blogger Hacked 340
WCityMike writes "Blogger has been severely hacked into, with users' passwords and e-mail addresses being replaced with 'hacx0redbyme' or 'hax0redbyme.' Apparently, attempts to change your password or other information do not succeed due to a major database problem. Blogger currently has no official news: its main page simply apologizes for being down for repairs and its status blog has no information, probably suffering from the same accessing problem as other blogs. In the meantime, discussion, information, and advice is appearing on the weblogs of Anil Dash and Tom Coates, as well as this QuickTopic thread. Glad I use another journaling service." We usually try to avoid "Site X Hacked!" stories, but since this affects so many people - and, heh-heh, they don't have anywhere else to talk about it - here you go.
A bit mean. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:A bit mean. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:A bit mean. (Score:2, Funny)
Why does a dog lick its balls? Because it can. And mostly, they do. Unlike humans weblogging. I'm sure many more can than do. And if they do, you don't really have to read them, or at least it is easier to ignore than the dog that just humped your leg. And as to boring each other witless, no they will never get bored sniffing each others arses. I suppose that is what really separates us.
Re:A bit mean. (Score:3, Funny)
true enough, but while the dog's licking thier own bits and each others orafices serves some kind of purpose, bloggers are nearly entirely useless. Actually I always thought that the best parrallel to blogging was the jerry springer show: sure you can brag about what a loser you are to the public at large, and jerry springer fans will complain that you "Don't have to watch it", but really the best solution to the problem is a little napalm.
as for the humourous arguement that somehow blogs "might be worthwhile to historians" perhaps in the same way that old trash becomes "valueable" to specialized trash collectors, i give you the poster child of blogging [livejournal.com] that i ran into while trying to give bloggers a fair shot from the last time
oh thank goodness. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:A bit mean. (Score:4, Funny)
Without blogging capabilities we would be just like animals you would see on The Crocodile Hunter on Animal Planet [discovery.com], Wed. and Sat at 8pm, 11pm, and 3am.
All in all, blogging gives us purpose, and gives us a sense of comfort, similar to the new E-Class from Mercedes-Benz [mercedes.com]
And in other news (Score:4, Funny)
I'm glad I don't use a blog (Score:4, Funny)
Oh wait, everyone can do that.
Doh!
Re:I'm glad I don't use a blog (Score:4, Funny)
Re:I'm glad I don't use a blog (Score:2)
Here we all, all worried about our privacy, and there are all these people that want to spread their personal info all over. I don't personally see the voyeurism that would justify this sort of nonesense. I mean, there's freaking books on how to do this crap, for pete's sake. Eh.
no where else to talk about it.... (Score:3, Funny)
Blogger's troubles (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Blogger's troubles (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Blogger's troubles (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Blogger's troubles (Score:2)
Movable Type put the moves on me. (Score:4, Interesting)
Movable Type is indeed excellent weblogging donationware. The folks at Movable Type [movabletype.org] are great at providing requested features and documenting their software. Installation takes (and I mean this) fewer than 15 minutes, set-up maybe 1/2 hour for even the most non-technical of users.
I would rather run the latest release of Slash and went so far as to even check out chromatic's [wgz.org] Running Weblogs with Slash [amazon.com] (NB: /.'ers, /. is a weblog) after reading this recent /. story about "Building Online Communities." [slashdot.org]
My problem though is that Slashcode requires a dedicated server--or one on which you have root acces--to install. I'm sure this gives Slash many advantages, but those of us who can't afford dedicated server solutions can't make use of those advantages. My web host doesn't even allow shell access.
Movable Type (and a few other brands of weblog software) offers people with cheap web-hosting solutions to successfully install high-quality, customizable, open-source weblog software. The couple who run Movable Type produce a quality product. Check them out if you want to run weblog software but don't have a lot of money.
I wonder if the /. crew couldn't be persuaded to come up with a version of Slash that doesn't require a dedicated server . . .
Re:Blogger's troubles (Score:2)
Your best hope to remain hack free is to design your own system from scratch. Preferably using some ungodly combination of Java, Fortran, XSLT, XML, and a custom database you wrote in C for the fun of it.
I have not figured that one out yet (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm waiting for the day I can host my own web again. Why should anyone have to go any further than their own 486 to put up a website? The quality of free software available and ease of set up is astounding. There are a dozen or so web servers in Debian, and many fine automation programs for putting content onto those sites. It's as easy as:
/apache
1. type deselect
2. press spacebar
3. type
4. press +
5. repeat steps 3 and 4 for igal and other programs you want.
6. press enter a few times.
7. pull up a browser, a command line and an editor and enjoy building your site.
I'm not sure why everyone interested has not done this. OK, ipchains takes a little more work, but it can be done in a few days with knowlegable help, so you can look at the rest of the web with the rest of your computers. The problem has something to do with the last mile, greedy and stupid publishers and fools that listen to them.
My cable company has made all but ftp impossible and ftp is painful to most of the people I'd like to reach. Outbound port 80, and 25 are blocked. Most cable companies don't block port 21 because that would kill AOL's instant messenger. Still, the upload rate is crimped worse and worse, and html files don't work well over the system. The overall performance is poor, but I'd rather send my mom there to look at baby pictures than send her to some advert filled crap I don't have any control over now or ever. Eventually they will block port 21.
It's stupid. My cable company could make more charging $20 a month to three people than $45 to one. I'd recomend people move to cable if cable were really worth anything to me, but it isn't so I don't.
blogging services are nice, but only needed because the net is not free.
Re:I have not figured that one out yet (Score:3, Informative)
Blogs, who need em? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Blogs, who need em? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Blogs, who need em? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Blogs, who need em? (Score:3, Informative)
Moveabletype works great for this (since I'm not a hardcore perl programmer, it was nice to have someone else do that work). I spent a few days building and modifying the page templates and setting up the site. Now all she has to do is login to a page, add a title and main story and click publish. Instantly several pages are updated with the appropriate news information, archives and search links, etc. Very nice since I don't have to waste time getting the information from her each time and create a new page. Great for her, because she can update the news website anytime she gets a press release.
I think Blogger itself is somewhat bland, mostly for the novice/home user wanting to get a voice out. For the professional there are some impressive tools that will save you time (Movabletype [movabletype.org] or Radio UserLand [userland.com])
- A non-productive mind is with absolute zero balance.
- AC
Re:Blogs, who need em? (Score:2)
hmmm... (Score:3, Funny)
Good for them (Score:3, Insightful)
I hate the word blog and all its derivatives, they deserve it for promoting this pop-culter-esque net phenomenon. Either you run a news site, a discussion site, a community, a personal journal or something along those lines. Blog is a stupid term someone made up to sound cool.
Re:Good for them (Score:2, Informative)
Say "web log" 5 times fast and you'll understand why.
I don't see anything "pop-culture-esqe" about it.
Nikkos
Re:Good for them (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Good for them (Score:2, Insightful)
As a *nix command, blog would be perfect. Hell, you've already got grep, cat, fsck, mount, umount, etc... Short commands with weird names, it'd fit in perfectly!
As a name for a personal journal however, it ranks right down there with OGG. These don't sound like technology terms, they sound like something a half-drunk mechanic would say to you... "OGG, your oil is all bloggy, your engine is fscked."
Personally, I have no need for a blog... As it stands, no one visits my home page (which basically consists of a standard AOL profile-type "about me" page, some MP3s of songs I made in Sonic Foundry Acid and a few free crappy VB programs) anyway so even if I HAD a life and things to write about, only thing that'd ever read it are the webcrawler bots. That's kinda depressing actually... I better schedule an appointment with my shrink.
Re:Good for them (Score:5, Insightful)
It's not like "blog" was created by an ad agency, or by some company to sell it's product. It's a contraction of "Web Log", which is what these types of sites are. Don't like the word? Don't use it. But don't wish an attack on someone because you find time in your day to hate a contraction.
Re:Good for them (Score:3, Funny)
Actually, no, what happened was everyone was calling it a 'weblog', which was naturally shortened to 'blog'.
This is just the latest in a long line of multi-syllable words shortened to single-syllable words, bro.
Re:Good for them (Score:2)
Meanwhile.... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Meanwhile.... (Score:4, Funny)
Someone hacked my blog. Ignore previous post about "Mandy is a sorry loser". Do not ignore October 20th post with the same title, as this was intentional.
Re:Meanwhile.... (Score:5, Funny)
That's cruel and completely not true.
The 4 of us handled it completely without anger and substituted by sending each other text messages on our cell phones.
Blogout. (Score:5, Funny)
recommendation (Score:5, Informative)
Hacked Blog? OMG! (Score:2)
I don't really get blogs... (Score:5, Interesting)
LiveJournal blogs are the worst, IMHO. People go on and on about events and parties with people that 99.99999% of their readers have never met. Once I realize I've stumbled across something like that, I leave it as soon as I can.
Is it exhbitionism/vouyerism? If I read stories about a person's private life, I'd much rather they beging with a line like, "Dear Penthouse, I've always read the letters in your magazine but never thought that something like that could happen to me..."
Re:I don't really get blogs... (Score:5, Insightful)
Why put it on the web? Well, there are often times, on irc and in email, when I want to point someone to something I've written... plus, if anyone is visiting my website, then it's possibly they want to know more about me. If they don't, then fine. If they do, then the weblog is there.
Annotated bookmarks (Score:3, Interesting)
But there is more to it than that. Everyone wants to spout off sometimes. If you have an easy forum for writing stuff down, eventually you'll rant about something. And doing so helps you "save state". You can go back a year later and see where you were mentally. And as you said, it helps people who are at a distance figure out what you've been up to. Having it web-accessible means you can write from anywhere.
There's nothing wrong with keeping a web journal.
-B
Re:I don't really get blogs... (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:I don't really get blogs... (Score:2)
"MetaFilter is one of the sometimes confusing class of sites known as 'weblogs.' In the original sense of the word, a weblog is a regularly updated collection of found links, commentaries, and personal reflections, maintained by a single person. For thousands of others, a weblog is simply an online diary - and while some have merit, many more (if not most) feature the "I hate my job," "my cat did the cutest thing," "here's my philosophy" essays which demonstrate that the locks on traditional diaries are there more to protect the public than the author's privacy. Fortunately, MetaFilter falls into the first category, with the distinction that contributions are not made by a single person - this blog has more than 12,000 contributors, and when it comes to scouring the Web, numbers matter."
Re:I don't really get blogs... (Score:2, Redundant)
Re:I don't really get blogs... (Score:2)
It seems that it entertains my friends, and I don't try to disappoint, but when all is said and done, if I don't write it down, it's pretty much gone for good.
Re:I don't really get blogs... (Score:2)
Re:I don't really get blogs... (Score:4, Insightful)
LiveJournal blogs are the worst, IMHO. People go on and on about events and parties with people that 99.99999% of their readers have never met. Once I realize I've stumbled across something like that, I leave it as soon as I can.
The obvious response is that you're not their audience. Most bloggers write to keep up with their circles of friends, not to impress the general public with the minutiae of their daily lives.
Re:I don't really get blogs... (Score:4, Funny)
AND (this gets even better) because it's publicly accessible, you can meet new people with whom you can make friends! You may not have grown up with access to the online world, but for the generation that has, the internet is a great venue for social interaction.
Does that help you understand why blogs appeal to some?
If you come across a blog whose contents do not interest you, it probably wasn't meant for you to read. That doesn't mean there aren't people who do care about that person and enjoy keeping in touch with them.
Oh yeah, and like the other guy said, your web page seems suspiciously weblog-like. And I liked the rant where you bitch about the Taliban's web page :-)
Re:I don't really get blogs... (Score:4, Insightful)
You don't get anything out of the little circle o'exhibition because it's really not there for your benefit. Move along.
But... but.... (Score:4, Funny)
Shameless plug for my weblog. (Score:4, Informative)
Unless you have 28 years of once daily entries.. (Score:5, Insightful)
A good flat file system lets you reuse the VFS of Linux for smarter caching, and it's easy to NFS or SMB mount it via any machine on my private network. This also means that for someone to compromise my setup and mess with my changelog, they'd also have unrestricted access (pretty much) to my local network, meaning I'd have a whole lot more to worry about than losing my journal entries.
How will we do without blogs? (Score:4, Funny)
I have a blog, but I only use it to say things like, "Fdisk overflowed when I tried to format my hard drive. Now it is negative 15 Gigs!"
So yeah, I need to be shot.
Blog = weblog (Score:5, Insightful)
I have never used one, or intend to. For some unknown reason, it bacame popular to just ramble out your thoughts into an online journal. Whatever. I don't see why this made the news though...
MOD Parent up (Score:2)
So, basically, an online journal site was hacked. Not sure this is big news, or news that mattered. But it does qualify as news for nerds.
Thanks, taco
Re:Blog = weblog (Score:2)
Then why are you reading Slashdot? Have you read any of CmdrTaco's news postings?
Oh no! (Score:3, Funny)
While Everyone (Score:5, Informative)
Huh? (Score:2, Funny)
Status Blog now has info (Score:5, Informative)
Blogger has suffered a security intrusion by a "haX0r." We have all the data that was changed backed up within a couple hours of the attack, so we can have things pretty much back to normal soon. Of course, we're assessing the situation as thoroughly as possible to make sure it doesn't happen again. Also, if you store your FTP login information in Blogger, it wouldn't hurt to change that on your server--though it is unlikely that information was accessed. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Re:Status Blog now has info (Score:3, Insightful)
It is "unlikely" that people got access to an account on your local machine. I think people might want to know either way. Quickly.
Re:Status Blog now has info (Score:2)
Is it just me... (Score:3, Insightful)
I have to wonder what kind of life someone must lead when an attack on their favorite website is as traumatic as the events of that day.
Re:Is it just me... (Score:2, Insightful)
These are asshats who's favorite TV show was preempted by news reports that day.
So they easily compare to this - their favorite website being temporarily.
It's about how it affected 'them', not the world.
Re:Is it just me... (Score:4, Insightful)
One outside of NYC, obviously.
9/11 may have been horrible and dastardly and evil and all--but "tramatic" it was not for me or anyone within a hundred miles of where I am, exempting those few who lost relatives.
Lots of services (Score:2, Informative)
There are a LOT of diary/journal/blog services on the web. My personal favorite: Digital Expressions [digitalexpressions.nu]. Not a lot of customization and such, and it has a smaller userbase and a very strong sense of community.
one more pointless joke about blogs (Score:5, Funny)
Sept 11?!?! (Score:4, Insightful)
"This is like September the 11th all over again."
Does that mean the attack on the WTC was a noble cause, causing many to rejoice, point, laugh, and snicker? For humanity's sake, I hope this was the thickest sarcasm ever to form.
Re:Sept 11?!?! (Score:2)
Better hope... (Score:2, Interesting)
And I hope they patch the hole before restoring from the backups.
More likely they'll dot-bomb.
Do you know who has your passwords?
Related story (Score:3, Interesting)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/28/27774.htm
By Andrew Orlowski in San Francisco [mailto]
It's a pity that Microsoft's Beth Goza, who we teased here [theregister.co.uk] last week, has taken down her weblog [216.239.53.100]. Far from wanting to see it disappear, it ought be preserved in a time capsule.
But not only has Beth's blog gone underground - so has the parody which inspired our story. It's disappeared from no less than five mirror sites.
Even more extraordinary, a witch-hunt is on to find the perpetrator. One member of the PocketPC community says legal action is being threatened against the author, whose identity remains a mystery.
"The phrase 'it will soon be out of our hands' was used by one figure close to Beth," we're told.
It would be remarkable if Microsoft's expensive legal and public relations machinery were deployed in what is essentially a private matter.
And highly unlikely, too, as parodies are protected under the First Amendment.
Microsoft's approach to the press is singularly enlightened, when compared to say an Apple. The company takes barbs in good grace, and doesn't deploy feudal divide and rule tactics. It's never, to our knowledge, sued a journalist. Of course it has its favorite hacks, but in general the philosophy is - they're always going to be mean to us, they'll always be around: meanwhile, we have a message to convey, and stuff to sell.
Evil and elitist?
So were we being evil and elitist, as some of you suggested?
As I replied [stretchingthought.com] to Jonathan at StretchingThoughts.com, it's onlyelitist if you think that blogs are folks' only form of expression.
The king of webloggers Jorn Borger [robotwisdom.com] - he was the first to use the term and it's still the best [theregister.co.uk] - used to use a quote by Tolstoy in his Usenet sig:- "In human stupidity, when it is not malicious, there is something very touching, even beautiful... There always is." And there is something bewitching about Beth's ruminations such as " just for the record i like it when my foods touch" a line worth of Ralph Wiggum [google.com].
No, what's strange is when an attack on one blogger is perceived as an attack on blogging in general. That implies that there can't possibly be a quality threshold in blogdom, and confirms John Dvorak's worst fears [pcmag.com]about groupthink. This is an unnecessarily defensive reaction and quite wrong. If blogs are writing, there's good and bad writing.
Of course, John was being satirical, and he wasn't decrying blogdom: only the mentality that blogging is in of itself revolutionary [theregister.co.uk] and no criticism can be voiced, and no quality threshold can be drawn; that we must not differentiate between good and bad, because it's all somehow equally valid.
The parody itself was pretty mean and spiteful. But it's a parody. We hope that groupthink doesn't extinguish parodies, as they help us see that the Emperor has no clothes.
Please let us know if you've been contacted in relation to this investigation. And in the meantime, enjoy some other fine online journals by Microsoft staff:- which might be low on cheap laughs, but high on content:- min jeschwad [netcrucible.com], Inkblog [inkblog.com], and more highlighted in this Kuro5hin thread [kuro5hin.org].®
Did anyone else notice.... (Score:2, Informative)
I have often thought of writing a little code that blocks refering domains if they refer too many in a set period of time.
Another Journalling service (Score:2)
I like it - that site wont be slashdotted!
For all those bashing "Blogs" (Score:5, Insightful)
Personal web pages were 50 times worse than any blog. It's evolution--not revolution
Anyway... My friend has a blog. It's is like the BBS I ran when I was 14. Some friends log in. We talk about intersting things (or not) publicly. Eventually when I did things right, a few extra people came along and we had some good conversations.
Re:For all those bashing "Blogs" (Score:3, Interesting)
But don't compare blogs to a BBS... those were the days when you actually had to have a brain to get online, versus now, when Bertha Walmartski can blog it up to tell the world that one of her three toy poodles is depressed.
P.S. some of those awful personal pages still exist. I'd tell you where, but you'd go blind viewing them ;)
Re:For all those bashing "Blogs" (Score:4, Funny)
You never signed on to my BBS did you
Re:For all those bashing "Blogs" (Score:3, Insightful)
No, you are wrong. I am still waiting for people to actually use their brain and creativity when online, instead of trying to run a webserver on a carport remote control. It is a shame that the internet has turned into an anarchistic kindergarten because only juveniles can get connected. The reason those awful personal pages exist is that NOONE has anything to say. I wish my grandparents could get on the internet and publish their ideas, experiences and memories instead of kids with fake Britney pr0n and 1337-speak.
Re:For all those bashing "Blogs" (Score:4, Informative)
Give this man a 5, Funny!
I used to frequent a BBS. The rank stupidity I encountered there still amazes me -- I kept a few logs of some of those exchanges, and my reaction varies between thinking they must have been joking and wondering how they could even operate a keyboard.
Incidentally, that particular BBS is still running, more than seven years later. I've checked in on a couple occasions, only to find the exact same users, arguing about the exact same things, obsessing over the same miniscule and irrelevant BBS policies, carving the same mountains out of molehills -- seven years later. It gave me the chills. I sometimes wonder if they're not trapped in some kind of Sartrian hell.
The tools have advanced, there are a lot more people on the net now, but the general level of intelligence (on both ends) is about the same as it always was. What you see in an average blog isn't any more or less insightful than what I saw in the "Grips" or "Non Sequitur" forums on the old BBS.
One more reason not to Blog (Score:2)
Re:One more reason not to Blog (Score:2)
I'm right on board with you. They didn't seem to do much to secure the database, when I looked at it about over a year or so ago [slashdot.org]. I became more concerned when they basically became a one-person operation, and have avoided the service like Kryptonite.
Let this be a lesson--learn to trust your service providers before you jump on board with them. Also, use common sense and avoid services that store your FTP (and possibly ISP!) account info.
The problem with overhyped blogs... (Score:2, Troll)
... is not the creator of those blogs who use everything from 500kb animated gifs to multiple embedded flash files to gain attention, no, it's those sad people who clique together and generally agree on everything that the creator writes. Basically, most blogs are from women of all ages and most fans are 14 year pubescent teenagers hoping to read something sexually orientated. Unfortunatly, it almost never goes past this:
Something like that, only true blogwhores type allot more and generally convey even less interesting facts... Ah well, at least I'm not wasting my time on stupid overhyped blogs. As for that someone who cracked the Blogger DB; Do something more useful next time your g/f breaks up with you, getting back at her by ruining her blog isn't the brightest thing around.
Alternate "weblog" site refusing access from /. (Score:2, Informative)
In additional developments... (Score:4, Funny)
-Rob
blogs are just the text version of The Sims... (Score:2, Interesting)
You're just sitting around watching (reading about) someone else living his* life. Perhaps the Sims is a little better, as you can direct the action.
Wouldn't it be great to have a life so good that you didn't have time to read about someone else's, or better yet, publish the details of yours (and your thoughts)?
Well, it is.
And no, I'm not being lifeless by writing this because I have to be at my computer now; I'm at work This also means I'm getting paid to write this, so double bonus for me.
* his is used instead of the incorrect "their" or the annoying "his/her". The author recognizes that women have blogs but has chosen to standardize on "his"
Re:blogs are just the text version of The Sims... (Score:2)
Er, why not use HTML? (Score:2, Interesting)
Well... (Score:2)
(Why? See below.)
I've been seriously considering a move to other ways to publish, with Moveable Type and Radio UserLand looking quite nice for support of images and the like (things I can't do from the free Blogger subscription). Now, it looks that I have a much bigger reason.
What the hell...it's only karma... (Score:5, Insightful)
90% of the posts in this thread are all "Holier Than Thou"-type Slashdot posts from fellow geeks that obviously feel some sort of insecurity about their own lives and are thus insulting those that use weblogs.
I don't use a weblog to achieve an inflated sense of importance or to boost my ego. I use it to keep track of what my friends and I are doing. A year from now, we'll have all graduated college, and it's nice to be able to keep tabs on everyone's day-to-day events...and to continue to do so even when we've gone our separate ways.
Just because you *think* the Internet is full of 12-year-old girlie bloggers discussing the drab details of their lives doesn't mean it's the truth. And even if it was, who appointed you "critic of all those lowly masses"? Get a life of your own, man...
Re:What the hell...it's only karma... (Score:3, Funny)
Where?
Where?
That's just what I'm looking for!
t_t_b
Whew. (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm glad the rule actually works, I never had a chance to test it out
I should change the message though, the "you look like you could use some sun" comment is probably a bit harsh.
blogger back up (Score:5, Informative)
Negative comments about weblogs... (Score:3, Insightful)
Just because you personally don't find the content of the average weblog interesting, should this really mean weblogs don't have a reason for existing?
Personally, I'm extremely grateful for weblogs, as they allow a lot more people to communicate, and for me to discover that communication, then would happen before.
* I read the weblogs of my favorite authors, knowing as one of the first people in the world when they finish the next chapter, decide on a title of the book, but far mroe important, getting all sorts of interesting insights into the creation of the book, into the links to real world events and the reasons for why certain things are what they are - this heightens my appreciation of said books.
* I read the weblogs of the key people working on developing the next version of my favorite software. A lot of Mozilla (to name one of
* I read the weblogs of various friends and acquaintances I have scattered all over the world. Weblogs are to email what usenet is to mailinglists. Pull, rather than push. I get the information when I want it, adn it still allows me to keep in touch with people I'd otherwise not have time for. Sure, the stories about their cats and dogs are completely irrelevant to 99.999% of the people out there; why would this not be perfectly okay? It matters to them and to the people who matter to them. Nobody's forcing you to read these weblogs... And every now and then one of these people will have something very profound to say, or will have dug up a really interesting piece of information, or came up with a really good joke... And then other people link to that, often in other weblogs, and the information propagates. And that's good too.
No matter how all of us might feel superior to the average 'blogger', no matter how all of us can whip up a solution that's both more convenient and technologically superior to this "Blogger" in a matter of hours... these are things that don't matter. It's the sharing of ideas, the communication, the links and bonds... that's what matters. Most of it is static, most of it will never be read by anyone. But all of these people maintaining weblogs are part of
After previewing I pulled almost all links from this comment - if you're really interested in the weblogs of the people I mentioned here, go and search for them...
Re:Missing option: (Score:2)
People, don't negativly moderate! Nobody really reads at 0 anyway. I mean, if a guy posts at 3 by default and it's a baaaaad post, then maybe, but not an AC! If you moderate good posts up rather than bad posts down, all the people reading at 3 or more will be better off, and I don't think many read at less than that (unless they're moderating).
Re:script kiddies are sickoes (Score:5, Funny)
They should be treated as if they burned down a building with cute little kitties living inside of it! Because, inside of every blogger there's a cute little kitty, just waiting for you to discover it.
What these hackers have done is atrocious. It's far, far worse than petty graffiti or vandalism. They have trampled the hearts and emotions of sensitive bloggers everywhere. And for that, there can be no justice -- only bitter revenge.
Specifically ... (Score:4, Informative)
The site blogger.com is running Microsoft-IIS/5.0 on Windows 2000.
Re:Blogger runs windows..... (Score:5, Informative)
Apache, perl, and php are vulnerable to the same type of hacks, it's not just Microsoft.
I believe the proper response is ... (Score:2)
Worst post ever
Re:I believe the proper response is ... (Score:2)
It's Friday, laugh!
Schadenfreude (Score:2, Insightful)
Any question of why people think geeks are losers can be answered for the most part by a quick scan of the postings in this story.