"We sent emails to an address, and we posted comments on his publicist's instagram" isn't the same as, "[Person] was warned."
They tried to contact a famous person, exclusively and casually via the internet, and did not receive any response. That is not the same as, "[Person] was warned."
Plot twist, Banksy was pissed about the flaw and decided to white hat hack his own site with a fake Banksy he made himself. The outrage got the problem fixed right away and he returned the money. But that wasn’t the 4th dimensional chess move, Banksy wanted to sell his first NFT without anyone even realizing it had happened while the actual first owner in history throws it away obliviously. Classic Banksy.
Nope (Score:5, Insightful)
"We sent emails to an address, and we posted comments on his publicist's instagram" isn't the same as, "[Person] was warned."
They tried to contact a famous person, exclusively and casually via the internet, and did not receive any response. That is not the same as, "[Person] was warned."
Re:Nope (Score:2)
Re: Nope (Score:2)
I wouldn't be surprised.
To me all this feels like a Banksy way of displaying the futility pf NFTs.