Trump literally tweeted this was the most secure election ever thanks to him, while at the same time saying he lost because of cheating.
Moronic supporters of his believe that though â" since when has contradiction mattered to Trump supporters? He will win in 2024 given how dumb people are. I mean he is even touting vaccine and yet the anti-vaxxer nutcases still support him. They donâ(TM)t mind him lying as long as he gets rid of the Mexicans and Muslims.
Trump literally tweeted this was the most secure election ever thanks to him, while at the same time saying he lost because of cheating.
Moronic supporters of his believe that though Ã" since when has contradiction mattered to Trump supporters? He will win in 2024 given how dumb people are.
There is no contradiction there. Being the most secure ever doesn't mean that there was no cheating at all, only that it was the lowest level of cheating ever seen. In a tight race like this even a small amount of cheating in the right places can flip the electoral college vote.
I was listening to the Coffee with Scott Adams podcast earlier and Mr. Adams pointed out the lack of contradiction. Call me some kind of sore loser, a Trump "shill", or what not, that doesn't change that being the most secure elec
I was listening to the Coffee with Scott Adams podcast earlier and Mr. Adams pointed out the lack of contradiction.
I'm starting to think that Adams is unaware that people view the Dilbert comic strip as a comedy akin to Catch-22 and that he writes it from the perspective of the heroic pointy-haired boss who is antagonized by evil engineers.
Call me some kind of sore loser, a Trump "shill", or what not, that doesn't change that being the most secure election ever is not contradictory to the possibility of cheating happening to flip the outcome.
Like many Trump supporters, you appear to be engaging in an extreme form of pedantry akin to a defense lawyer advocating for an obviously guilty client. If the defense lawyer does a good job, his efforts can be appreciated because he's just doing his job and it's necessary for even th
It's not like this was Bush v. Gore. It wasn't as tight as you're making it sound. Cheating would require tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of votes to swing the election. There's no evidence that even small scale cheating occurred.
If that's true then why all the wailing and gnashing of teeth from the Democrats? You'll have your victory, just give it time. Calm down and act like you won fair and square for once.
At this point in 2016, the Obama administration had already began the transition to Trump presidency, Clinton had conceded, Trump had been invited to the White House, etc.
Trump supporters (Score:5, Insightful)
Trump literally tweeted this was the most secure election ever thanks to him, while at the same time saying he lost because of cheating.
Moronic supporters of his believe that though â" since when has contradiction mattered to Trump supporters? He will win in 2024 given how dumb people are.
I mean he is even touting vaccine and yet the anti-vaxxer nutcases still support him. They donâ(TM)t mind him lying as long as he gets rid of the Mexicans and Muslims.
No contradiction (Re:Trump supporters) (Score:0, Troll)
Trump literally tweeted this was the most secure election ever thanks to him, while at the same time saying he lost because of cheating.
Moronic supporters of his believe that though Ã" since when has contradiction mattered to Trump supporters? He will win in 2024 given how dumb people are.
There is no contradiction there. Being the most secure ever doesn't mean that there was no cheating at all, only that it was the lowest level of cheating ever seen. In a tight race like this even a small amount of cheating in the right places can flip the electoral college vote.
I was listening to the Coffee with Scott Adams podcast earlier and Mr. Adams pointed out the lack of contradiction. Call me some kind of sore loser, a Trump "shill", or what not, that doesn't change that being the most secure elec
Re: (Score:5, Informative)
I was listening to the Coffee with Scott Adams podcast earlier and Mr. Adams pointed out the lack of contradiction.
I'm starting to think that Adams is unaware that people view the Dilbert comic strip as a comedy akin to Catch-22 and that he writes it from the perspective of the heroic pointy-haired boss who is antagonized by evil engineers.
Call me some kind of sore loser, a Trump "shill", or what not, that doesn't change that being the most secure election ever is not contradictory to the possibility of cheating happening to flip the outcome.
Like many Trump supporters, you appear to be engaging in an extreme form of pedantry akin to a defense lawyer advocating for an obviously guilty client. If the defense lawyer does a good job, his efforts can be appreciated because he's just doing his job and it's necessary for even th
Re: (Score:0)
It's not like this was Bush v. Gore. It wasn't as tight as you're making it sound. Cheating would require tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of votes to swing the election. There's no evidence that even small scale cheating occurred.
If that's true then why all the wailing and gnashing of teeth from the Democrats? You'll have your victory, just give it time. Calm down and act like you won fair and square for once.
Re:No contradiction (Re:Trump supporters) (Score:5, Insightful)
Read the 9/11 report. It tells you why smooth transitions of power are necessary, and why the Democrats are "wailing and gnashing".
Re:No contradiction (Re:Trump supporters) (Score:5, Informative)
At this point in 2016, the Obama administration had already began the transition to Trump presidency, Clinton had conceded, Trump had been invited to the White House, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Why? When did Pelosi run for the presidency?
Re: (Score:2)