These guys (and everybody who violates the privacy laws like them) should be required to pay for in depth fraud monitoring and credit report monitoring. If you are going to warehouse our data especially without our knowledge, then they should pay for their own screwups.
So again: please find the exact law. No Criminal negligence found in Title 18 USC. In state law it almost always refers only to criminally negligent homicide or the criminally negligent endangerment of a child, only.
I believe you are taking my post a bit too seriously (see what it says next to Score:? That's what I was going for).
However, since you insist on being so serious, I'll add a more serious note: First of all, IANAL, nor have I ever portrayed myself as one (although my sister is). The clueless sysadmin (I hesitate to even honor someone who was using IIS 4.0 with the title of 'sysadmin', but whatever...) who failed to keep his software properly updated is probably not 'criminally' negligent' or depravedly ind
Credit report monitoring (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Credit report monitoring (Score:0)
Re:Credit report monitoring (Score:2, Funny)
That is criminal negligence. Depraved indifference, and the like.
Re:Credit report monitoring (Score:1)
Re:Credit report monitoring (Score:1)
However, since you insist on being so serious, I'll add a more serious note:
First of all, IANAL, nor have I ever portrayed myself as one (although my sister is). The clueless sysadmin (I hesitate to even honor someone who was using IIS 4.0 with the title of 'sysadmin', but whatever...) who failed to keep his software properly updated is probably not 'criminally' negligent' or depravedly ind
Re:Credit report monitoring (Score:1)
Actually my first reply was to the first posting on this topic and not really directed to you.
I was being serious only to learn since the law does vary between the states and California does seem to have some strict ones on the books.
Lastly,
Yes: about them "What a way to run a railroad!"
How do they operate like that?
So again, sorry....