Google Exposes Web Surveillance Cams

Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google Exposes Web Surveillance Cams

Load All Comments

Search 453 Comments Log In/Create an Account

Comments Filter:

The question is (Score:4, Funny)

by cainskltn ( 847151 ) writes:

What is the search keyword.
- Re:The question is (Score:-1, Troll)
  
  by Anonymous Coward writes: on Sunday January 09, 2005 @11:05AM (#11303837)
  
  Here is the search pattern for the cams on google [tinyurl.com]
  
  Parent Share
  twitter facebook
  - - Re:The question is (Score:2)
      
      by spectre_240sx ( 720999 ) writes:
      
      Good to do a google search on url's before visiting if there's any question. I was unfortunate enough to see tubgirl once and I'm still not sure if my vision has completely returned.
      - Re:The question is (Score:1)
        
        by AmbyVoc ( 596135 ) writes:
        
        Oh, That's what it was! I knew it.. damn that privoxy is good.. :)
    - Re:The question is (Score:1)
      
      by AmbyVoc ( 596135 ) writes:
      
      What, an empty page??
      
      - Voice of Ambience -
  - Ah, America (Score:1)
    
    by ScrappyLaptop ( 733753 ) writes:
    
    ...notice that her genitals are pixelated out; seeing them, according to the FCC and most of the religious right, would be...obscene.
    - - OT: Re:Ah, America (Score:1)
        
        by ScrappyLaptop ( 733753 ) writes:
        
        Thanks for pointing out the origin of tubgirl. I'm no conspiracy theorist; just trying to make a point about obscenity being relative. Actually, you help me make that point if you are serious about the pubic hair. Could you expand on that a little, please?
        
        Re:OT: Re:Ah, America (Score:1)
        
        by xanadu-xtroot.com ( 450073 ) writes:
        
        Yes, he's quite serious about the pubic hair thing. I don't have any URL's handy to show (since I'm not into that stuff...), but, yes; in Japan the pr0n is indeed classified different depending on whether there's pubic hair or not. Clearly, "tubgirl" has no pubic hair, thus that image (in Japan) is "legal". It's an interesting world. folks...
        
        Still OT: Re:Ah, America (Score:1)
        
        by ScrappyLaptop ( 733753 ) writes:
        
        Thanks. Interesting, yes, but not so odd when you consider that we Americans appear downright terrified, yet fascinated with women's breasts. Show the top, sides or bottom of your breasts and it's sexy. Display an obvious nipple projection and it's sexy. Show areola skin or worse yet, an actual nipple(!) and you've crossed the line. We actually project quite a few such dichotomies...

There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.

Google Exposes Web Surveillance Cams More Login

Google Exposes Web Surveillance Cams

The question is (Score:4, Funny)

Re:The question is (Score:-1, Troll)

Re:The question is (Score:2)

Re:The question is (Score:1)

Re:The question is (Score:1)

Ah, America (Score:1)

OT: Re:Ah, America (Score:1)

Re:OT: Re:Ah, America (Score:1)

Still OT: Re:Ah, America (Score:1)