Is it running a Windows 10 ARM Insider Preview virtual machine natively on an M1 Mac compared to running a Windows 10 ARM Insider Preview virtual machine on a 2019 model 15-inch MacBook Pro with an Intel Core i9 processor, 32GB of RAM, and Radeon Pro Vega 20 graphics? That seems to be the most likely interpretation.
Is it running a Windows 10 ARM Insider Preview virtual machine natively on an M1 Mac compared to running a Windows 10 ARM Insider Preview virtual machine on a 2019 model 15-inch MacBook Pro with an Intel Core i9 processor, 32GB of RAM, and Radeon Pro Vega 20 graphics? That seems to be the most likely interpretation.
That can't be the correct interpretation - you cannot run a Windows 10 ARM Insider Preview virtual machine on any Intel X86 processor.
I know the writing is worded poorly, but it probably means vs. running a Windows 10 INTEL Insider Preview virtual machine on an Intel MacBook Pro. And I believe this. Windows VMs on a MacBook Pro hammer the CPU, cause the fans to spin up & generally consume a LOT of resources (I run one daily).
What is 30% better compared to what exactly? (Score:3)
Re:What is 30% better compared to what exactly? (Score:1)
Is it running a Windows 10 ARM Insider Preview virtual machine natively on an M1 Mac compared to running a Windows 10 ARM Insider Preview virtual machine on a 2019 model 15-inch MacBook Pro with an Intel Core i9 processor, 32GB of RAM, and Radeon Pro Vega 20 graphics? That seems to be the most likely interpretation.
That can't be the correct interpretation - you cannot run a Windows 10 ARM Insider Preview virtual machine on any Intel X86 processor.
I know the writing is worded poorly, but it probably means vs. running a Windows 10 INTEL Insider Preview virtual machine on an Intel MacBook Pro. And I believe this. Windows VMs on a MacBook Pro hammer the CPU, cause the fans to spin up & generally consume a LOT of resources (I run one daily).