Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
typodupeerror delete not in
  • Preferences

+-   Vulnerabilities Treated as Defects?-> on Saturday June 28 2008, @08:48AM SecureThroughObscure

Submitted by SecureThroughObscure on Saturday June 28 2008, @08:48AM
security
SecureThroughObscure writes "ZDNet Zero-Day blogger Nate McFeters has asked the question, "Should vulnerabilities be treated as defects?". McFeters claims that if vulnerabilities were treated as product defects, companies would have an effective way of forcing developers and business units to focus on security issue. McFeters suggests providing bonuses for good developers, and taking away from bonuses for those that can't keep up.

It's an interesting approach that if used, might force companies to take a stronger stance on security related issues.

SecureThroughObscure"
Link to Original Source
submission
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Vulnerabilities Treated as Defects? 0 Comments More /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
Search
To follow foolish precedents, and wink With both our eyes, is easier than to think. - William Cowper

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.