Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Security

Researchers Build Covert Acoustical Mesh Networks In Air 107

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers at Fraunhofer FKIE, Germany have presented a paper on covert acoustical communications between laptop computers. In their paper 'On Covert Acoustical Mesh Networks in Air', they describe how acoustical communication can be used to secretly bridge air gaps between computers and connect computers and networks that are thought to be completely isolated from each other. By using ad-hoc routing protocols, they are able to build up a complete mesh network of infected computers that leaks data over multiple hops. A multi-hop acoustical keylogger is also presented where keystrokes are forwarded to an attacker over multiple hops between different office rooms. The fundamental part of the communication system is a piece of software that has originally been developed for acoustic underwater communications. The researchers also provide different countermeasures against malicious participation in a covert acoustical network. The limitations of air gaps have been discussed recently in the context of a highly advanced malware, although reports on this so-called badBIOS malware could not yet be confirmed."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Researchers Build Covert Acoustical Mesh Networks In Air

Comments Filter:
  • by Jah-Wren Ryel ( 80510 ) on Monday November 25, 2013 @02:22PM (#45516891)

    They used Lenovo T400 laptops which are circa 2008 models, no extra audio hardware. They could do 20bits/sec over nearly meters 20 meters if they had line-of-site between the laptops.

  • by bobbied ( 2522392 ) on Monday November 25, 2013 @02:27PM (#45516935)

    Oh great... Can't you hackers just leave well enough alone?

    I've had to disconnect my network cable, remove the wireless card, and disable all the USB ports to make my machine secure and now I have to disable the audio hardware too? Man, this is getting out of hand..

    Seriously though... This is new how? We have been sending data using audio cards between computers for decades. I remember cranking up the cassette tape drive to load programs into my TRS-80 in high school and hooking up to an acoustic modem to get on dial up AOL. Recently I've used my computer to talk to another computer halfway around the world though an RF link provided by my ham radio. Hams routinely transfer "data" over packet, PSK and other modes over audio links using their audio cards in their computers.

    Oh, wait, so the ad-hock links are the new thing? Um, not so fast there either. Mesh networks have been around long enough to fall in and out of favor once or twice. Ham radio operators might know about HSMM Mesh http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/ [broadband-hamnet.org] has been doing mesh networks for nearly a decade, and the protocol it uses internally wasn't the first. So this is not new..

    I conclude that NOTHING here is new, except perhaps combining an audio network link with a mesh networking protocol.... But I don't see that as ground breaking..

    The only thing this will really do is make it necessary to disable/remove audio hardware from secure computers, just because somebody might try to use it for something stupid. Thanks guys (and gals if there are any working on this) for making my life harder...

  • Re:band pass filters (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 25, 2013 @03:41PM (#45517769)

    You're both uninformed. Computers don't lack filters. There are analog low pass filters on all audio inputs, because they're necessary (see the Nyquist/Shannon sampling theorem). The thing is, the cutoff frequencies are necessarily above the audible range, because there are no perfect "brick-wall" filters. For systems with sampling rates higher than 44.1kHz, the cutoff frequencies are far above the audible range. Otherwise what would be the point of providing the high sampling rate? Yes, it's audiophile hocus-pocus, but people buy it. None of this is relevant to the topic though, because the researchers used frequencies which are theoretically audible. But most adults don't hear much above 15kHz, so they don't notice these "audible" frequencies. When TVs were still called "tube", did you hear a high pitched sound in TV stores? If not, your audible range is already significantly diminished. The horizontal frequency is ca. 16kHz and the oscillating magnetic field caused parts in some TV sets to vibrate and emit noise at that frequency.

Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky

Working...