Lavabit.com Owner: 'I Could Be Arrested' For Resisting Surveillance Order 255
Zak3056 writes "NBC News is reporting that 'The owner of an encrypted email service used by ex-NSA contractor Edward Snowden said he has been threatened with criminal charges for refusing to comply with a secret surveillance order to turn over information about his customers. "I could be arrested for this action," Ladar Levison told NBC News about his decision to shut down his company, Lavabit LLC, in protest over a secret court order he had received from a federal court that is overseeing the investigation into Snowden.''"
Just comply with the court order (Score:5, Funny)
There's no point to be made from not complying with a legitimate court order. Just comply with it. One day you could be very thankful that we have a legal system that was created to protect us. Please respect that and our fellow citizens.
welcome... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Inevitable consequence of unfettered capitalism (Score:2, Funny)
Wake up America, or lose everything you care about.
Oh god, is something going to happen to Game of Thrones?!
Secret court orders, secret trials (Score:4, Funny)
All that's missing is establishing a People's Court [wikipedia.org] and we're set.
(Please read the Wikipedia article before invoking Godwin)
Re:obama = a more palatable cheney (Score:0, Funny)
As illustrated, you don't understand anything about cryptography or certificates. No, the Feds don't magickally have access to something called a "certificate". Yes, you can get a certificate from one of the various root certificate authorities (CA). The CA signs the certificate using a cryptographically secure hash indicating that the certificate does belong to you and has not been altered. The CA does not have access to the private key of the key pair and cannot use the certificate to decrypt or generate hash signatures.
However, if you insist on being paranoid to the point of not having a functioning brain, you are free to create your own certificate. There are a plethora of tools to do the job. Microsoft provides one as a part of Windows Server and also ships one as a part of the freely downloadable software development kit. There are also countless other free tools on virtually any OS you can think of that can accomplish the same. Your self-signed certificate will work just as well, excepting that by default any OS will not have a method to validate that the certificate should belong to the individual that the certificate claims that it does. Afterall, I could make a self-signed certificate that claims to be Joce640k just as easily as you can. In virtually all software you can override this either directly in the application, or by trusting the certificate in the platform key store.
Of course, this all has been a waste of time. Facts get in the way of a perfectly unreasonable conspiracy theory.
Re:Just comply with the court order (Score:3, Funny)