Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Security Your Rights Online

Ask Slashdot: Using Company Laptop For Personal Use 671

An anonymous reader writes "I'm starting a new job soon, and I will be issued a work laptop. For obvious reasons I cannot name any names, but I can state that I do expect my employer to have tracking software on the laptop, and I expect to not be the administrator on the device. That being said, I am not the kind of person who can just 'not browse the internet.' If I ever have to travel with this laptop, I may want to read an ebook or watch a movie or maybe even play a game. I can make an image of the drive, then wipe the machine, and restore it back to its former state if I ever have to return it. I can use portable apps off a usb key and browse in private mode. The machine will be encrypted, but I can also make myself my own little encrypted folder or partition perhaps. Are there any other precautions I could or should take?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Ask Slashdot: Using Company Laptop For Personal Use

Comments Filter:
  • Wow (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Isarian ( 929683 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @01:15PM (#39239973)

    You're kidding right? Don't be an idiot, follow the terms of your employer and get your own damned machine.

  • Re:Buy your own (Score:4, Insightful)

    by ribit ( 952003 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @01:18PM (#39239995)

    We don't know what the terms or the job are. If you travel a lot with work, having to haul two laptops around may be unreasonable.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 04, 2012 @01:18PM (#39239997)

    Agreed. It's THEIR notebook, not yours. They bought it. It belongs to them. They have loaned it to you for work purposes. Don't abuse that by messing around with it.

    If you want to do other stuff, buy your own notebook, tablet or smartphone.

  • Are you serious? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Pollux ( 102520 ) <speter@[ ]ata.net.eg ['ted' in gap]> on Sunday March 04, 2012 @01:22PM (#39240051) Journal

    If you're seriously thinking that you need to go through that much trouble to hide your "bad work habits," the problem really is you. You appear to be aware of your less-than-exceptional work habits. Reading between the lines, it almost appears as though you lost another previous job because of your self-distractions during work.

    Rather than try and hide your browsing history, why not try working for a change? They are paying you to work, after all. And on periods of downtime, bring your own laptop.

  • Re:Wow (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Alan Shutko ( 5101 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @01:23PM (#39240059) Homepage

    Nope. But that's life.

    In my case, I worked to get rid of the company-issued laptop in favor of citrixing into my desktop at work. That means I have to carry less, and since I'm not constantly on the road, works well for me.

  • Slow Nerd Day? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Trip6 ( 1184883 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @01:23PM (#39240071)

    The answer is so obvious to get your own laptop that I can't believe this even made it on the boards. Slow nerd day?

  • by msobkow ( 48369 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @01:26PM (#39240103) Homepage Journal

    I know people will go to great lengths to complain about their "right" to abuse company resources for their own benefit, but this takes the cake.

    You want to WIPE the company hard drive and all the software that is provided for you to do your job, and you don't see a fundamental flaw in this reasoning?

    You, sir, are a selfish, greedy, ignorant, and probably USELESS fuck who shouldn't be hired by ANYONE.

  • by K. S. Kyosuke ( 729550 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @01:39PM (#39240255)
    Agreed. And if you happen to recollect that you have to stop by the grocery store on your way from work while driving your company's car, park it at home, get into your own vehicle and only then go shopping, because that's clearly the most reasonable thing to do.
  • by blackicye ( 760472 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @01:48PM (#39240349)

    Buy yourself another laptop.

  • by swillden ( 191260 ) <shawn-ds@willden.org> on Sunday March 04, 2012 @01:50PM (#39240369) Journal

    The other posters have covered well the fact that you really shouldn't try to work around the employer's policies. Getting caught is likely, and almost certainly grounds for termination. Don't go there.

    That said, you should find out what the employer's policies actually are, rather than just assuming they're going to be insane. I've had a company-issued laptop since the mid-90s, with several different employers, and none of them have done what you describe. Moreover, I've also spent years consulting with dozens of companies about their IT security policies, including management of laptop use, and none of them have approached it the way you describe, either.

    Most employers care about (in decreasing order of importance):

    1. The security of their data. There are lots of good reasons for this, obviously. This includes things like full-disk encryption to ensure that if the laptop is lost the data it might carry is not revealed, and mal-ware prevention in order to prevent mal-ware from revealing important data.

    2. The security of their network. Since you'll bring the laptop into the office and connect it to the network, employers don't want the laptop to be a vector for malware or targeted attacks.

    3. Preventing HR problems. Stuff like porn on screens in the office can create sexual harassment lawsuits. This is the primary reason for anti-porn rules.

    4. Productivity. Misuse of company equipment on company time means (arguably) that productive work that should be done isn't. This is another reason for anti-porn and anti-surfing rules.

    Different companies take different approaches to managing these risks. A common, if very authoritarian, approach to limiting malware, for example, is to allow only software which is specifically approved by IT to be installed on the machine. Keylogging doesn't really accomplish any of the above, however, and I've never seen any company who does it, with the exception of one company that installs a browser plugin which watches for users typing their corporate password into non-company web sites.

    If you're using the laptop at home, on your own time, I don't think most employers will care if you surf a little, check your personal e-mail, watch Netflix, etc. They may or may not care if you surf porn. I think most would rather not know. Outside of that, if it doesn't require changing the security configuration of the laptop, doesn't require installing software and doesn't interfere with productive work, I doubt they're going to care.

    Check out the policy carefully, ask questions to make sure you understand it, and then comply with it. But I would be surprised if the policy truly is as draconian as you say.

  • Re:No (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Collapsing Empire ( 1268240 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @01:50PM (#39240375) Journal

    Once you lose physical control of a machine, you really can't say much about the security of it. You don't know where that laptop has been or who else might have tampered with it while it has been traveling the globe. The best you can really do is the standard antivirus scans. But that doesn't stop a 0-day or a custom written trojan.

    You really ought to be treating all portable devices as potentially hostile devices and securing (and monitoring) your networks accordingly.

    IMO if the user is competent enough to install Linux or their own custom Windows image on there, I don't think you are any worse off than it was previously. Seeing how out of date some IT departments are with patching and service packs, the machine may end up being more secure.

  • by Anrego ( 830717 ) * on Sunday March 04, 2012 @01:51PM (#39240377)

    I would take any of that as a sign that your employer is serious about controlling their equiptment and trying to subvert their control is a sure way to find your stuff in a box at reception when you get back from your trip.

    In other words, a sign to buy your own laptop ;p

  • Re:No (Score:3, Insightful)

    by jowifi ( 1320309 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @01:57PM (#39240413)
    The solution I came up with was to buy a spare hard drive and caddy for the machine. When I wanted to do my own thing, I swapped out the drives. No risk of contaminating either system with data from the other, and it's a lot easier to carry around than an extra laptop or even a tablet. It also tends to be faster that a cd or usb drive.
  • by icebike ( 68054 ) * on Sunday March 04, 2012 @02:03PM (#39240459)

    If they give you a company car to take home, chances are they allow grocery shopping.

    But if you have to jump on Slashdot and ask about GPS jammers and how to disconnect your built in Nav in a company car so that the company can't know that you routinely stop by the strip club on the way from/to customer meetings, you already have stepped over the line.

  • by The Good Reverend ( 84440 ) <michael@michris. c o m> on Sunday March 04, 2012 @02:12PM (#39240531) Journal

    Perhaps you're injecting your own life into your posts here?

    I love the internet. I love web surfing. I love communicating with friends and family that aren't close to me. But I also like to read, to go drink beer with friends, and to spend too many hours in my garden. The two are not mutually exclusive.

    To say that he has an addiction because he's asking about technology tells much more about you than it does about him.

  • Re:No (Score:5, Insightful)

    by maxwell demon ( 590494 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @02:19PM (#39240585) Journal

    Another solution is to simply ask the employer, if some personal use of the laptop is OK, and if so, to what extent. Maybe you'll get the answer that your intended usage is fine, and then you'll not have to worry at all about how to hide it.

    Indeed, if I were the employer, if someone asked I'd probably be fine with it, but if someone were playing tricks to hide and I'd find out, I'd seriously consider firing him.

  • by Patch86 ( 1465427 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @02:20PM (#39240595)

    I doubt they'll mind him reading his favourite news website or going on Amazon on the new work laptop, you know. They might take issue with him installing a pirated copy of Crysis, or downloading porn.

    The question isn't really whether they'll mind him doing stuff on their laptop, but whether they'll mind him massively messing with their software and hardware setup- live booting, partitioning, wiping and restoring, swapping out HDD, and all the other stuff suggested in this thread. If nothing else, it's classic "guilty behaviour"; how do they know whether he's doing it to hide his porn habit, or hide his massive illegal company fraud? If they think he's going to a lot of effort to deceive them and hide his behaviour, they're going to assume the worst.

    Going on Amazon on the company laptop is the equivalent of going to the supermarket in the company car. Wiping the company laptop's HDD is the equivalent of popping the company car's bonnet and replacing components with ones you've bought on eBay.

  • by centuren ( 106470 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @02:23PM (#39240617) Homepage Journal

    I can make an image of the drive, then wipe the machine, and restore it back to its former state if I ever have to return it.

    Is your new job worth it? Not saying you'll automatically lose your job over that, but I can't imagine it'll go over well. Especially as you'd be using your (non-work prepared) laptop for doing work and might inadvertantly put them at risk (the kind of risk they hope to eliminate by issuing you the laptop in the first place).

    The simple solution is get yourself a USB / livecd type distro. Don't touch the hard drive.. and if it's encrypted, you shouldn't be putting your company at risk (assuming you don't use the same key for anything else). Personally I'd ask your IT guys if they are ok with this before doing it. Sometimes they can actually be reasonable about this kind of stuff.

    The real solution here is to leave your work laptop alone completely and get your own laptop for personal use.

    The parent correctly points out that you can use a live distro and avoid having to touch the company's hard drive.

    Maybe, maybe not. There may be key-loggers installed which still grab your keystrokes.
    Further, you can set up machines to prevent booting from anything other than the hard drive, then lock the bios.

    Just to be clear, OP is saying he is "not the type of person who can't look at pornography" right? In this work-related scenario, if that's the case, get your own laptop, tablet, or smart phone.

    If that's not the case and he is worried any personal use will get you in trouble, that's probably something he should clarify. I know plenty of unreasonable work places are around, but it is unreasonable to expect no personal use from a company laptop in constant possession of an employee (especially outside of work hours).

    If neither is the primary case and you are expecting the laptop to be so locked out that you can't run anything but an office suite and the company-modded IE-engine software, then, as was pointed out, run a separate OS off a thumb drive. If the hardware is completely locked-down, back to the tablet/smartphone concept. Look up the policy, talk to the IT guys, but, essentially, DON'T do something that can mess up IT's carefully locked down security, and DON'T do things that are illegal or NSFW.

    If the issue isn't "I want to look at pornography on my work laptop", why would the company care if he reads an ebook or watches a movie, if it's done responsibly (and somewhat out in the open, so all that's monitored is a lot of "unknown activity")? It kind of sounds like it's a porn thing, though. Maybe it's the inferred metaphorical air quotes.

  • Re:Buy your own (Score:5, Insightful)

    by pla ( 258480 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @02:30PM (#39240667) Journal
    Buy your own laptop to fuck around with you cheap bastard. The laptop is the property of your employer and if you don't agree to the terms they set then don't work for them.

    This is an entirely fair point of view.

    To which I would respond, if my employer presented it as an argument, by leaving said laptop at the office 24/7/365. I might take it to (on-site) meetings so I could actually get some work done in the back of the room while the 3rd assistant VP of Buzzword Optimization drones on with a variety of incorrectly-used physics metaphors.

    Companies provide people with laptops in the hope that those people will do "free" extra work for the company. In some cases, the use of a laptop for whatever-the-hell-I-want while stuck in a hotel room for four days between conference sessions makes up for that extra work they might occasionally get out of me. If I can't use it for anything but work, I view it as nothing but an albatross to lug around, feed, and check through security. And if it actively tracks me while on my own time - thankyouverymuchbutfuckrightoffnow, 'kay?
  • by John Bresnahan ( 638668 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @02:31PM (#39240675)
    This is one of the reasons the iPad is so popular. It makes a good personal web-surfing device when traveling on business with the company laptop.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 04, 2012 @02:40PM (#39240729)

    If some company installs GPS trackers to find out where their employees spend their leisure time, i'd say it's the company that crossed the line first. I can't imagine any reason to put up with shenannigans like that. Employees _do_ have a right to privacy, even in the face of corporate paranoia.

  • Re:No (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Bill_the_Engineer ( 772575 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @02:43PM (#39240749)

    I'd hope that the people I issue laptops to are responsible and trustworthy. Personally I don't care if they use the laptop for personal web browsing or e-book, as long as they do it on their own personal time. Most appropriate use agreements say the same thing. I do draw the line at installing programs on the laptop.

    However I always strongly suggest people to have their own laptops/computers for personal use. Information stored in the form of cookies, browser history, etc. can be embarrassing or worse. There was a local county worker who was dismissed for inappropriate material being found on his work laptop while it was being serviced by the IT contractor. No one thinks about the laptop failing and having your personal data locked up for the IT repair guy to find. I find it amusing that they warn of key logging (which isn't as wide spread) but aren't as cautious about being caught in a compromising position.

    Another (and more appropriate reason for the people I work with) reason being that the company I work for (and most others) consider the use of company equipment for personal financial gain as an offense worthy of dismissal and any goods produced on company equipment as their property. Lawyers are more expensive than a laptop - a.k.a an ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure.

    You really ought to be treating all portable devices as potentially hostile devices and securing (and monitoring) your networks accordingly.

    Placing company laptops in a DMZ doesn't always make for a productive work environment nor is your monitoring idea that effective. A compromised laptop can still "behave" in a company private LAN and once connected to a public hotspot send its payload to whomever. There is a reason we like locking down company equipment. Locking down company equipment also has a "cover your ass" attribute that network monitoring alone can't offer. Also depending on the industry there are regulations that may dictate such measures to be taken.

    IMO if the user is competent enough to install Linux or their own custom Windows image on there, I don't think you are any worse off than it was previously. Seeing how out of date some IT departments are with patching and service packs, the machine may end up being more secure.

    The employee should stick to his/her paid job assignment and let IT do the job for which they are paid. I have company equipment that have two or more operating systems on them, but they were all approved by IT first and my job directly depends on it. I believe altering the contents of a company laptop in such a drastic manner without the consent of IT may be a severe violation of the use agreement.

  • Re:No (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Glonoinha ( 587375 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @02:56PM (#39240875) Journal

    Smartest thing I've read all day. It is literally a perfect match to the original question, which is probably the dumbest thing I've read all day (drive image your work laptop, smoke it and install your own warez, and restore the drive image before giving it back to them.)

    OP - here's the one piece where your plan fails : the active directory connection establishing your machine as a trusted member of the domain, and your user as the domain with the same name ... disconnects if it hasn't been refreshed in a while. I don't know how long it takes, but it happens. And it is a particularly uncomfortable discussion with corporate IT explaining why, given that your machine looks exactly like it did when they gave it to you, and you have been using it for a few months. The question is going to come up 'What did you do to it?' and you are going to answer just like they expect you to 'Nothing.' ... and it goes downhill from there.

    Technical answer for you is same as Anrego : USB Thumbdrive install of Linux : Pen Drive Linux [pendrivelinux.com] has a zillion distros you can pick from, and they give you step by step instructions on making it work.

    If technical answer #1 doesn't work for you, here's technical answer #2 for you : remove the work hard drive, install a new hard drive, install your own OS on that and swap out drives for work / pleasure. Downside is limited to the danger of physically borking the work drive while removing it or storing it while it is out of the machine. Explaining how you managed to mangle the SATA connector on a work laptop is a very difficult discussion.

    Personal preference answer is also same as Anrego : don't do anything on your work laptop that you wouldn't do with representatives from corporate HR, IT, your boss and his boss standing over your shoulder. Buy a cheap used netbook for $150 on Craigslist and take it with you to do your warez/internet surfing/pr0n viewing.

  • by HapSlappy_2222 ( 1089149 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @03:05PM (#39240937)
    In my experience, having a company laptop issued to you is much like having a company car issued to you. Take care of it, don't do anything you're not supposed to with it, and remember it's issued to you to make your job easier, so make sure it does. I can't think of a single thing that you should be doing on a company laptop that you'd need to encrypt or hide from your employer (remember, THEY own the hardware), so a lot of your question is moot.

    Stuff like reading an e-book, browsing the web, or customizing it to your specification is probably fine, assuming it doesn't interfere with your actual work. Well, unless your company has specifically told you NOT to do these things, in which case you really should bring a second, personal, laptop (or kindle, or ipad, as others have said) with you. Doing anything you'd be embarrassed to have your boss find out about is simply not a good idea, though. Think of it like it's your work desktop, only portable, and adjust your usage accordingly.

    I don't see why this question needs a more complicated answer than this. If you still have questions, ask your boss. None of us on Slashdot are policymakers for your company, and asking us to decide for them is silly.
  • Re:No (Score:5, Insightful)

    by unixisc ( 2429386 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @03:09PM (#39240983)
    I fully agree w/ this. In all my jobs, I made it a point to not do any personal stuff on work laptops (and once they disabled webmail sites like gmail, the only potentially urgent personal thing to do was out the window). On my home laptop, I did whatever non-work related stuff I wanted. Never faced any issues - particularly given how it's well known that there is no guarantee of privacy as far as one's work laptop is involved.
  • by unixisc ( 2429386 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @03:18PM (#39241057)

    I know plenty of unreasonable work places are around, but it is unreasonable to expect no personal use from a company laptop in constant possession of an employee (especially outside of work hours).

    The only case I can think of where personal use of one's work laptop may be unavoidable is if the employee is travelling out of town on a business trip somewhere - he's not likely to take 2 laptops w/ him. In such a case, it may make sense for him to use IE's InPrivate Browsing or something similar. Or else, better idea - if he has his tablet or smartphone w/ him, use that. I'm assuming that it would be for afterhours entertainment (once all the meetings and dinners are over) and he's done checking his work stuff on the laptop.

    Otherwise, get another laptop/tablet/smartphone for what you need to do. Laptop if a lot of typing will be involved, and tablet/smartphone if it won't. Whether it's porn or visiting otherwise blocked websites, do it on your own equipment - and on your own time.

  • Wow, lots of hate (Score:4, Insightful)

    by aztektum ( 170569 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @03:19PM (#39241065)

    Yeah the person is going over board with talk of wiping his laptop and all that noise.

    But what is with all the vitriol? He's a "cheap bastard". He has horrid working habits. His life is hollow and he should read a book? How any of that was deduced from one post on /. is beyond me.

    My advice, as someone who has written AUP for companies: If your company policy is that ridiculous, you should question working there. Odds are it is not. My guess is if you get your work done they really won't give a rats arse. The laptop is their property, a worker is not. If they cannot accept you checking YouTube or /. while off the clock (including a quick break here and there), they're crazy.

    But, should you seriously just want to avoid it: Make a bootable Linux USB drive and encrypt /home

  • Re:My solution (Score:2, Insightful)

    by interval1066 ( 668936 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @03:23PM (#39241101) Journal
    Just get your own net book man.
  • Re:No (Score:4, Insightful)

    by HornWumpus ( 783565 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @03:45PM (#39241259)

    If someone has gone to the lengths of locking down the laptop they must have concerns. Important IP and known active industrial espionage would be the kind of head space I'm describing.

    Given that mode of thinking, I would assume you would check the image of returning employees laptop hard drive for malicious changes installed by professionals.

    Even if you trust your employee completely, the laptop has been in the hands of customs and other unknown people while in the world. It can't be assumed safe until re-imaged. Finding any attackers code would be a bonus of the 'standard' harddrive swap by IT on return.

    And no it wouldn't be that bad. Employee has only had laptop for a few days. Tech pulls old drive, installs standard image replacement, checks for nonstandard flash, updates crypto, puts back on shelf. Tech installs old drive in USB enclosure, enters crypto key, scans then copies data folders to employees user folder, then runs paranoia process on OS and drive. If nothing found drive re-imaged and put back on shelf.

    To the employee it looks like he turned in his machine and his data showed up in his folder 30 minutes later. To the tech it looks like he has a job doing paranoid shit, until one day he finds the next Stuxnet.

    I assume, more or less this, is routine at many corporate R&D centers. In that world they do have to treat employees as, at least, potentially hostile.

  • Re:No (Score:5, Insightful)

    by PNutts ( 199112 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @03:48PM (#39241285)
    Holy jebus. You should be embarrased to post that in what used to be technical forum. A laptop in possession of a trustworthy employee governed by policy is not losing physical control. It's not your resource to do what you please and you don't manage it. You also didn't build and tweak it so don't assume the things that work on yours will work at it. The company will have policies on what's appropriate ranging from "no personal use" to "occasional use" to "go forth and surf". The OP didn't mention what the policies and so this entire thread will be a flame war. The rest of what you say is so obvious as to be insulting. Except the last paragraph which is dangerously naive. Any decent IT shop will evaulate the risks before rolling out a patch just because it's Tuesday. It might not be necessary at all.

    Just because the OP has no self-control to 'not browse the internet' that doesn't mean his company has to assume the cost and risk of him doing so.
  • Re:No (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 04, 2012 @04:41PM (#39241627)

    Parent = computer janitor. Last I checked computer janitor != the person paying software developers for their work.

    software developer > IT. If IT gets in the way of a software developer doing his job, the software developer should have his manager sucker punch IT guy's manager in the next sufficiently public meeting.

  • Re:No (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Tom ( 822 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @05:13PM (#39241839) Homepage Journal

    All the information needed to access corporate services is in my possession anyway, so you're none the wiser. If you block Internet access at work, I will happily tether to my iPhone or bring my iPad.

    Let me get this straight: You would connect to the corporate network using a private, unapproved machine? And you would then connect that machine directly to the Internet?

    In several environments in which I've worked, as the IT Security/Compliance Officer I would recommend you for immediate termination.

    Just because you think that you are entitled to your own rules doesn't make it so. If you don't like my rules, you are welcome to come into my office and discuss them with me. You better have good reasons, because I do.
    You are not free to just break the rules and open up the corporate network to the world at large, bypassing all the security layers that are there for a reason.

  • Re:No (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Tom ( 822 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @05:16PM (#39241867) Homepage Journal

    You can lock down a notebook well enough that it requires malicious intent and considerable technical skill to tamper with it.

    The fact that there is no 100% security doesn't mean that there isn't 99% security.

    IMO if the user is competent enough to install Linux or their own custom Windows image on there, I don't think you are any worse off than it was previously. Seeing how out of date some IT departments are with patching and service packs, the machine may end up being more secure.

    Maybe. But that "more" of security could be in the wrong place, while the security that actually matters for the threat scenarios that the risk assessment has defined has been reduced.

  • Re:No (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Collapsing Empire ( 1268240 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @05:34PM (#39241985) Journal

    You should be embarrased to post that in what used to be technical forum

    Name one technically inaccurate point made in my post. Tick, tock. I'm waiting.

    A laptop in possession of a trustworthy employee governed by policy is not losing physical control

    So you're saying that all employees will carry their laptop on their person at all times, including while they're going through airport security (in which the agent asks you to take the laptop aside), never left in a hotel room, never left in a meeting room at a conference while everyone goes to grab lunch, and etc?

    You really have no clue. You should be the embarrassed one.

    The OP didn't mention what the policies and so this entire thread will be a flame war.

    Well thanks for taking the high road buddy.

    Except the last paragraph which is dangerously naive

    No, it's not naive just because you don't like the point I made. Just because you've never worked with a company that can't keep up with patches doesn't mean these IT departments don't exist. Unlike you, I've actually done real IT work, done IT consulting, and do IT security for a living.

  • Re:No (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Tom ( 822 ) on Sunday March 04, 2012 @06:50PM (#39242417) Homepage Journal

    somebody has physical access to the laptop for a minute or two. A backdoor is loaded on the laptop during the distraction.

    I think you need to be a little more detailed at the "and then magic happens" step.

    If I can compromise your notebook in two minutes, it was never properly secured. How do you intend to get your backdoor on there? Type it in? Oh, you assume I have an optical drive and USB ports that will accept any arbitrary device someone happens to plug in?

    Again, the question goes back to what this employee is really doing.

    No, it doesn't. It goes back to what the company is doing. If they are in any business where lives are on the line, or actual damages could occur - I'm not talking about a dent in profits - then what the employee wants to stroke his ego doesn't matter.

    Not all mobile users handle sensitive data or are really targets for attacks.

    If your notebook goes on a network I'm responsible for, then it is a potential target. Even if it contains no data worth anything, it can bring malware into the system, or a nice piece of malware could download sensitive data unto it once it has connected to the network.

    Read up on Stuxnet and how it got across not only firewalls, but airwalls.

Get hold of portable property. -- Charles Dickens, "Great Expectations"

Working...