Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Crime Security IT

Anonymous Threatens Robin Hood Attacks Against Banks 529

gManZboy writes "Just in time for the holidays, hacktivist collective Anonymous has announced that it has teamed up with like-minded group TeaMp0isoN to donate to charity. The catch: they're using stolen credit data from big banks to make donations, in a campaign they're calling Operation Robin Hood. Is the #OpRobinHood campaign for real, or like previous threats against Wall Street and Facebook, just another hoax? Aesthetically, at least, the OpRobinHood video ticks all of the traditional Anonymous aesthetic requirements: a mashed-up 'p0isoaNoN' logo (green on black), a liberal dose of swelling choral music (via that movie trailer staple 'Europa,' by Globus), together with selected clips of Kevin Costner as Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Anonymous Threatens Robin Hood Attacks Against Banks

Comments Filter:
  • by Nidi62 ( 1525137 ) on Wednesday November 30, 2011 @11:45PM (#38222814)
    So, they want to steal peoples' credit card info and use that to donate those peoples' money to charities. Then the banks have to reimburse the people whose info was stolen. There are a lot of things wrong with this. First off, for those people whose info gets stolen, they are out money until the banks go through the process of reimbursing them. With the numbers of people that would be affected by this, that could take a while. So, people will be short of cash at a time when they need it most: the holidays. This is not going to endear people to their cause. Also, what is going to happen to this data? I really doubt it's going to be deleted. Remember, Anonymous can be anyone. This information will end up for sale on black market sites. You should not be breaking the law and endangering innocent people/invading their privacy just because you don't like the bank. They are really showing themselves to be no better than the banks themselves; they are taking other peoples' money and doing whatever they want with it that servers their purpose, regardless of the consequences.
  • by Dr. Spork ( 142693 ) on Wednesday November 30, 2011 @11:53PM (#38222856)

    If they send the money to honest charities like Oxfam, Unicef or Médecins Sans Frontières, they will probably just re-credit the transferred money back to the bank. And if they use some less scrupulous charity, well, that charity shouldn't be getting money in the first place. In any case, there's no real win here.

    What would be really cool, though, is if Visa (to demonstrate their unbreachable security) set out a Hack-for-Oxfam challenge, in which any money that hackers manage to route to Oxfam would be stay with them and be considered a charitable donation from Visa. It would be great free publicity if the hackers failed, and a very good deed would be done if the hackers succeeded - plus, they could patch the exploited security holes.

  • Ready, Fire, Aim (Score:4, Interesting)

    by girlintraining ( 1395911 ) on Wednesday November 30, 2011 @11:54PM (#38222866)
    I've often wondered if a lot of these Anonymous posts are really Department of Homeland Security officials looking to justify their massive overspending for imaginary threats. These are the guys that coordinated sending in 1400 police to round up 50 protesters (and the media had little or nothing to say about the excessive display of force, instead focusing on how much it's costing taxpayers). Given the current climate of committing acts of excessive violence against its own citizens, using military weapons on a peaceful populace, and recent actions about entrapping average people and setting them up to be paper terrorists...

    I think there's ample evidence to conclude that this could very well be an attempt by the DHS or the FBI to create more paper terrorists. You can expect some arrests around the holidays. They're almost stalinist in their punctuality of the trials, whether public or secret.

  • Re:Great (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Darinbob ( 1142669 ) on Thursday December 01, 2011 @12:14AM (#38222990)

    Most of anonymous is in the middle class (if they own a computer and can spend time hanging out at forums then they're not the super poor). So they should just donate their own cash to charities. Think they'll go for this idea, or they'd rather just steal someone else's money and then brag about it on their ipads?

  • Re:Great (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Nugoo ( 1794744 ) on Thursday December 01, 2011 @12:21AM (#38223044)
  • Re:Ready, fire, aim (Score:5, Interesting)

    by thogard ( 43403 ) on Thursday December 01, 2011 @01:27AM (#38223398) Homepage

    The charities will be worse off since the banks will take the money back and then charge the charity a charge back fee. This action could bankrupt some charities.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 01, 2011 @01:33AM (#38223442)

    What I keep wonder about is even though money and dept might be in balance, what about the interest money which is collected ?

  • by Wandering Voice ( 2267950 ) on Thursday December 01, 2011 @01:53AM (#38223544)
    I have to agree with the commenter who said this sounds more like a DHS propaganda effort than anything. If Anonymous really wants to hurt banks, why not just use simple acts of vandalism. I would think that vandalizing branch locations across the country would have a bit more of a financial impact against the banks. How much money would a bank lose if its branch offices were closed up for a day or three? If ATM machine screens were smashed so they are unusable. What if it happened to five branch locations across the city?
  • by jmottram08 ( 1886654 ) on Thursday December 01, 2011 @02:03AM (#38223584)
    Except that all they need to do is buy credit cards online and use those numbers. Bad bank publicity even if they explain that they weren't technically hacked, the elephant in the room is that it exposes inherent security flaws in the credit card system. There is no way the banks could "win" that challenge.
  • by 7-Vodka ( 195504 ) on Thursday December 01, 2011 @02:49AM (#38223790) Journal

    No, you really can't. However, certain institutions (the Federal Reserve Bank and other equivalents) can effectively create cash by creating an equal amount of debt, which works much like cash but with a negative value. Then that institution can issue both the cash and the debt to a bank, effectively giving a value of zero. If a bank wants to lend out the new cash it just received, it's still stuck with the equivalent amount of debt to pay back at some point. The bank could make arrangements with other banks to pay back the debt for them, and raise fees to cover the debt, but the debt still exists. There is no non-existent cash, and there is no free money, either.

    I think you are really confused.

    Let me ask you this. If the inflation rate is 3% per month and I'm able to secure a 30 year loan from the federal reserve at 0% interest, is the federal reserve not in effect GIVING me free wealth? The answer is an obvious yes. Please learn about rhetorical questions.

    Where is this wealth coming from? It's coming from the IDIOTS holding US dollars during that 30 year period, watching the value decrease through the inflation that is created by the zero interest rate federal loans of which they'll never get their hands on.

    Those idiots are YOU and I and everyone else in this country who is not a crony of the 1 party system.

    Now you might say "well why don't you invest in commodities then? you don't need no stinkin commodities crowding your living space, just buy into the markets and the futures and options."

    To which I reply "good Effing luck getting any of your wealth back from the hands of those in wall st"

    I've been through this before in other countries. The next step is to declare a bank holiday and freeze people's bank accounts so you can't retrieve your money. Freeze and confiscate their commodities. Freeze wages. Your debts won't be frozen. You will still have to pay your mortgage and your car payments, but your bank account will be frozen. The inflation will keep slicing away at your frozen salaries too. When it's all said and done, the debt of the 1% will be liquidated as it needs to be and the wealth of the 99% will no longer be in their hands.

    END THE FED.

  • by blanks ( 108019 ) on Thursday December 01, 2011 @02:53AM (#38223808) Homepage Journal
    I've stood behind many of the things Anonymous has done in the past but this just seems stupid.

    The only thing this will do is cost charities millions in audits, time, etc and make many lose services they use to collect donations. You know what will happen if a charity receives illicit funds through paypal? Their bank account gets frozen and paypal will in most cases never allow them to use their service again.

    If they want to be dicks they should use these attacks through online services that the music/movie industries run / make money from, or big evil online retails like walmart and bestbuy or make payments to other banks customers mortgages / dept.
  • Re:Ready, fire, aim (Score:5, Interesting)

    by bronney ( 638318 ) on Thursday December 01, 2011 @04:08AM (#38224050) Homepage

    Your bank sucks bro. My DBS card center called me once on the suspicious activity right after the charge by an ID thief and with my approval proceed to reverse, cancel, cancel the card, issue me a new card in the mail while keeping the old account number all on the same phone call. I asked them how they know it wasn't me, they said they analyze my previous spending pattern (I only use my card for online payments) and notice this is a weird large sum offline payment. Totally wow'ed me omfg112 props!!

    In the fierce competitive banking environment such as Hong Kong, people actually work hard to win your business.

  • Re:Ready, fire, aim (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 01, 2011 @04:10AM (#38224062)

    I'm not sure about the order. Obama had already had some people (including teenagers) murdered by predator drone before he went and laughed and joked about it at a press conference, saying that boys dating his daughters better be careful.

  • Re:Ready, fire, aim (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mwvdlee ( 775178 ) on Thursday December 01, 2011 @04:22AM (#38224102) Homepage

    As GP said, if usage falls outside your normal usage pattern, they'll detect it.
    Chances are that if those black hats use a thousand credit cards, atleast a few dozen of them will look like normal usage patterns.

  • by Inda ( 580031 ) <slash.20.inda@spamgourmet.com> on Thursday December 01, 2011 @05:17AM (#38224332) Journal
    I've never understood people paying 30% interest on their credit cards.

    Never let your credit card debt be more than your monthly wage. Pay it off in full monthly and get charged 0% interest. It's that easy.

    1. You are always one month ahead. You basically have a free month's wages until the day you die.

    2. Many cards, like mine, offer 1-2% "cash back". I actually get supermarket points on mine which can be doubled or quadrupled at certain times of the year. It's like getting paid to use the card. Up to 7% sometimes.

    3. Profit.
  • Re:Ready, fire, aim (Score:4, Interesting)

    by rwv ( 1636355 ) on Thursday December 01, 2011 @09:08AM (#38225156) Homepage Journal

    Assuming the jurisdiction of this 'hack' is in the USA, what about donating stolen money to the IRS? Best case -- lower national debt. Worst case -- getting the attention of the government money collectors.

    The Scrooges always say... if Warren Buffet thinks he should pay more to the IRS, why not just write the check? Well -- replacing "write a check" with "maintain inferior security of their monetary systems" works. Anonymous can pass along the money for Buffet and the Scrooges in kind!

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...