Water Pump Destruction Not Due To SCADA Hack 90
knifeyspooney writes "According to the Springfield State Journal-Register, the city's recent public water system failure was not caused by malicious activity. One water district trustee spoke this gem: 'First, they tell us that it's the first instance of cyber hacking in the entire world, and everyone goes nuts. Now, all of a sudden, they tell us it's not.'"
First instance? (Score:5, Insightful)
Manipulating the stupid masses through media. (Score:5, Insightful)
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2011/07/11/3265013.htm [abc.net.au]
http://idle.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/07/14/1235220 [slashdot.org]
Re:So, the question is.... (Score:2, Insightful)
No. It was a revised statement based on new information. That's still allowed, right?
Re:Y'all missed a critical paragraph in TFA (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:So, the question is.... (Score:4, Insightful)
screenshots prove nothing... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Manipulating the stupid masses through media. (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm a big fan of good evidence but if you don't read Leo Strauss and discover that a critical component of neo-conservatism is having an enemy to unite people against, then find out that an entire war launched by neo-cons that dumped billions into the pockets of neo-con friendly businesses was based on entirely fabricated evidence against the enemy, then wonder if some elements of governments might be willing to engage in extreme hoodwinking to get what they want....maybe you are in denial.
Re:Sowing the seeds of cyberwar profiteering? (Score:4, Insightful)
Well stuxnet affected Programmable logic controllers that affected centrifuges refining nuclear material. I was at a conference recently and half the talks were about stuxnet, duqu and PLCs, the show was not energy or utility industry related, but basically anything with a PLC is vulnerable to this sort of attack.
There were a lot of folks in industry talking about how uncertain they were about how tight their air-gaps were. Stuxnet got past air-gaps anyway, but at least a lot of the industrial controls folks are talking about it now. It would have been nice if someone listened when US-CERT reported researchers were able to remotely burn out an electrical generator in 2005.