Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Security Spam Stats IT

Spamming Becoming Financially Infeasible 212

itwbennett writes "Making money in spam isn't as easy as it used to be. 'It's not something financially feasible for anyone to even consider,' said Robert Soloway, who in his heyday made $20,000/day as a spammer. 'Spam — the Internet's original sin — dropped for the first time ever at the end of 2010,' writes IDG News Service's Robert McMillan. 'In September, Cisco System's IronPort group was tracking 300 billion spam messages per day. By April, the volume had shrunk to 34 billion per day, a remarkable decline.' Soloway says spam filters have become too good."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Spamming Becoming Financially Infeasible

Comments Filter:
  • by hedwards ( 940851 ) on Thursday June 30, 2011 @12:20PM (#36623850)

    People have been working on increasing the cost and decreasing the reward from spamming for some time now. From discouraging people from buying from spam messages to grey listing, to shutting down botnets, all of that has been largely for the purposes of making it less attractive to spam.

    I'm just a bit surprised that it's starting to have an effect, it's hard to compete with basically free server capacity and bandwidth.

  • by Medievalist ( 16032 ) on Thursday June 30, 2011 @12:53PM (#36624296)

    Aren't most of the spam kings either dead, retired, or in jail at this point? I hear it's lonely in Boca Raton these days.

    And wasn't there a wave of murders in the former Soviet Union when Microsoft and Time-Warner/AOL decided they were no longer going to ignore spammers? Bunch of free-lance software developers with connections to organized crime found dead, as I recall; the rumor was that the spam kings were eliminating people who knew too much.

    Well, regardless of the truth or falsehood of any of these tales and rumors, if corporate pressure has made spamming unprofitable, I'm certainly not complaining. It's about time the f***ing invisible hand did something besides j***ng off US Congressmen.

  • Re:Good news, but... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by plover ( 150551 ) * on Thursday June 30, 2011 @01:34PM (#36624758) Homepage Journal

    I've heard that 'spam' subsidizes the entire USPS. Without the revenue generated by 3rd class bulk rate, first class postage would probably be about $2 USD per letter (allegedly.) Thus spam keeps your letter carriers coming around every day, except Sundays.

    Of course, that was several years ago. I've also heard that email has decimated the first class postage business, so the proportional subsidy is now probably much higher than that.

Without life, Biology itself would be impossible.

Working...