Power Grid Change May Disrupt Clocks 439
hawguy writes with an AP story about upcoming tests of greater allowed variation in the frequency of the current carried on the U.S. electric grid: "A yearlong experiment with the nation's electric grid could mess up traffic lights, security systems and some computers — and make plug-in clocks and appliances like programmable coffeemakers run up to 20 minutes fast."
"Clocks" (Score:3, Informative)
Clearly, whomever thought this was a Pretty Neat Idea hasn't read this:
http://yarchive.net/car/rv/generator_synchronization.html [yarchive.net]
and doesn't understand what happens when you're even a bunch of *degrees* out of sync, much less a few decihertz. We don't have *near* enough HVDC intertie to make this not matter, and I can't imaging how they think this is gonna work -- nothing at all on NERC's website to say what's *really* gonna happen, either.
Love all the warning, too.
here's the scale (Score:5, Informative)
20 minutes fast over the course of a year.
Re:"Clocks" (Score:1, Informative)
"whom" is for objects in speech. For subjects, you want to use "who".
Electric clocks (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Nevermind cheapo clocks (Score:4, Informative)
If your laptop power supply is anything like all the ones I've owned, it won't care. According to the label (and testing done while I travel), mine works just fine on nominally 50-60Hz mains power. I imagine it wouldn't really care if you went from 45-65Hz, though I suspect it might get a bit annoyed if you were to go to 400Hz or something extreme.
Re:"Clocks" (Score:4, Informative)
Clearly, whomever thought this was a Pretty Neat Idea hasn't read this:
http://yarchive.net/car/rv/generator_synchronization.html [yarchive.net]
and doesn't understand what happens when you're even a bunch of *degrees* out of sync, much less a few decihertz. We don't have *near* enough HVDC intertie to make this not matter, and I can't imaging how they think this is gonna work -- nothing at all on NERC's website to say what's *really* gonna happen, either.
Love all the warning, too.
I think the organization that's responsible for the reliability of the entire USA power grid has some idea of the need for frequency stabilization when connecting new power sources to the grid. Not that it's relevant for what they are proposing - power plants already know how to sync up their generators to the grid and they don't care if it's 60.001 Hz or 60.002 Hz, they'll take that into account.
The magnitude of this frequency deviation is tiny, 20 minutes/year is about .003% - the power grid can fluctuate much more than than on a daily basis, but until now, it's always been corrected to keep the overall frequency at 60 Hz.
Re:"Clocks" (Score:4, Informative)
The US operates three separate power grids: the east interconnect, the west interconnect and ERCOT. They're only connected by DC links and are not phase locked.
Re:The real question (Score:4, Informative)
A highly accurate crystal costs in the order for $1 for single quantities.
And gains or loses perhaps a minute per year - while the grid has been good for a fraction of a second (adjusted when the powerhouse clocks drift more than that from the national standard committee of atomic clocks).
So that's why line-powered clocks use the line for the primary reference and the crystal oscillator to avoid having to reset it after a power failure (and to insure you get your wake-up alarm). And why most appliances don't bother with a crystal at all. (Why spend extra to make them LESS accurate?)
Keeping accurate time is HARD. Distributing it by the power grid is EASY.
Re:WHY? (Score:5, Informative)
Load on the grid shows up as mechanical resistance to the big spinning generators that control the frequency. If there is more load than generated supply, the generators slow and the frequency drops; more supply than load and the turbines spin the generators faster. Maintaining a balance of power is done by keeping the frequency at 60Hz.
That was easy enough when all power came from big generators, with predictable loads. But if you mandate photovoltaics and wind and other forms of power which vary in output, then things are a lot harder. The wind dies and a major wind farm drops a few hundred megawatts? The big generators can't respond quickly enough to keep frequency within its regulated range, so power companies have to install very expensive systems that can react faster.
Utilities are often legally mandated to buy power from renewable sources, but those renewable sources aren't held to any of the grid stability requirements. This ends up shifting an enormous burden of cost onto the utilities, who aren't happy with it. Loosening the grid frequency requirements is a way to make renewable but unreliable power less expensive.
Re:here's the scale (Score:4, Informative)
The PET 3032 (back in 1978), free-running and unsynchronised, was capable of 30-seconds-per-year accuracy on a decent, clean power supply. That was, admittedly, about the absolute limit, but you could do it. A modern computer runs around 4 billion times as many cycles per second. More if you supercool then overclock it. A modern computer also has up to 16 cores per node and fairly typical clusters can have 64 nodes.
As for analog watches, the high-end mechanical watches you can buy off-the-shelf have a drift of around 1 second per day (30 times better than your estimate and 3 times better than any computer is capable of doing if the power supply will induce 3 seconds a day error). For free-running digital devices, a typical Casio quartz digital watch is around six nines accuracy (0.1 seconds drift a day), no synchronization required. Which means you can actually buy a cheap wristwatch that's 30x more accurate on timing than the best home computer you can get.
Sorry if I find the incompetence of hardware engineers a little hard to accept, I just prefer standards that, y'know, improve over time, not regress. 3 seconds a day drift is what vintage Swiss watches could do. I prefer modern technology to do better than the stuff that Huygens could do, not merely equal it.
Not too many analog or power people here I see. (Score:5, Informative)
This is no big deal. What they are talking about here is the additive cycles in a day and not worrying about the compensation process for that.
Some basics:
Anything connected to the 60Hz power is at 60HZ, You can not connect a 61Hz generator to the grid.
In addition, when you connect a generator to the grid, you have to adjust its phase, as you bring it on line.
If the phase angle does not line up you get you get into a "tug of war" between multiple generation sources and that doesn't work.
The sine wave coming out of one generator has to line up with the other sine waves from the other sine waves from the other generators.
60 cycles/sec X 60 sec/min X 60 mins/hour X 24 hours/day = 5.184E6 cycle/day
What the article is talking about is the adjustment of the generating stations on the grid so that at the end of the day you get that exact number of cycles across the grid, not one more not one less. It is "really close" without tweaking but not exact.
It costs money to do those tweaks, to get the numbers on the money. That tweak right now really doesn't serve much purpose anymore.
Noting exciting, or interesting here, this is not Y2K nonsense, move along...
Music (Score:5, Informative)
1) - The mainstay of every old piano tuner's toolbox is the Conn Strobe Tuner.
2) - There are still thousands of working Hammond B/C series electric organs in use.
3) - Lastly let's not forget the audiophiles and their vinyl record turntables.
In fact anything with a shaded pole induction motor is speed-locked to the line frequency.
Re:Is timekeeping really that difficult to solve? (Score:5, Informative)
No. If you take apart a clock radio with 4x7-segment LED display, chances are that it has a 9v battery compartment at the bottom, and an LM8560 inside. It's an IC that's been used for over 30 years and still in production. No matter how cool, modern looking, flashy blue LED display it is, it has the same IC a brown 1980s clock with red LEDs had. It could be a clone or have a different name, but it is that chip.
Guess what: it takes voltage from the transformer, before rectification, into one of the pins. It also has another pin to set 50/60Hz operation. And a SHITTY RC circuit for running off battery (useless, it's off several minutes every hour).
Another thing: most electric things CAN'T be plugged anywhere now. My grey-market XBOX 360 has a 120V power brick (I live in a 220V country). If you live in the USA, take a look at how many electronic stuff at your house doesn't even have a 220/110V switch. The only things you can pretty much plug in anywhere are chargers. Most other stuff either can't, either by design (things with motors or appliances you don't carry around), or by cost (most electronic stuff without a 110/220V switch).
Re:Nevermind cheapo clocks (Score:4, Informative)
LED alarm clocks still use an LM8560. Go buy one, take it apart, and find the ic with the weird pin spacing (not standard 0.1"). That's the same IC that's been in use for over 30 years. And it still runs on mains frequency (it has a pin to select 50/60hz operation).
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)