Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Security

LulzSec Phone-Bombs FBI and Blizzard 404

Revotron writes "Anonymous hacker group LulzSec has begun to harness the power of the crowd in their latest griefing attempts. After a day of numerous DDoS attacks on a handful of famous MMOs, LulzSec's phone lines lit up with an estimated 20 calls per second. Using a fairly simple phone redirect, they sent all of their incoming calls to various offices, among them the FBI office in Detroit, Blizzard Customer Support, online retailer Magnets.com, and most recently, the corporate offices of HBGary." Update: It looks like they also brought down the CIA website tonight, but it is up now.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

LulzSec Phone-Bombs FBI and Blizzard

Comments Filter:
  • cia.gov (Score:4, Informative)

    by Huluvu ( 1371705 ) on Wednesday June 15, 2011 @05:51PM (#36455804)
    “Tango down - http://t.co/2QGXy6f [t.co] - for the lulz.” http://twitter.com/#!/LulzSec/status/81115804636155906 [twitter.com] wtf
  • Re:Balls of steel (Score:4, Informative)

    by mykos ( 1627575 ) on Wednesday June 15, 2011 @05:51PM (#36455806)
    They're here to kick ass and chew bubblegum, and they're all out of gum.
  • Re:False flag (Score:4, Informative)

    by westlake ( 615356 ) on Wednesday June 15, 2011 @07:38PM (#36457040)

    I don't want to sound like a tinfoil hatter (even if I do), but something tells me that these guys are contracted by the government because supporters of the Patriot Act are thinning in numbers.

    LulzSec has been rapidly escalating its campaigns since the legislation has been passed. It was not on anyone's radar during the debate in Congress.

    May 27, 2011:

    Overcoming objections from a bipartisan clutch of libertarian-minded lawmakers, the legislation passed the Senate, 72 to 23, and the House, 250 to 153.

    Senator Rand Paul won a small battle with his opposition to the Patriot Act by reaching a deal with Congressional leadership to add votes on two amendments, one of which would exempt some gun records from government searches.

    That was the score late Thursday afternoon following Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's (D-Nev.) announcement that after days of grueling debate over the renewal of three key Patriot Act provisions, Senate leaders had reached a deal on allowing votes on two amendments proposed by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.).

    Under the agreement, announced less than nine hours before the law currently extending the Patriot Act provisions was to expire, the Senate would vote on two amendments proposed by Paul: one that would limit "suspicious activity" reporting requirements under the Act to requests from law enforcement agencies, and another -- the one that had seen the greatest opposition from Reid -- that would exempt certain gun records from being searched under the counterterrorism surveillance law.

    The victory for Paul wasn't so much that either of his amendments would pass -- in fact, both fell well short of the 60-vote threshold necessary for approval, with the gun-rights amendment receiving the support of only 10 senators.

    Rather, it was that after days of vowing to block the passage of the Patriot Act extension -- even at the risk of missing Thursday's deadline -- Paul, a tea-party freshman who has served in the Senate for less than five months, was granted votes on his two amendments.

    Patriot Act extension signed into law despite bipartisan resistance in Congress [washingtonpost.com]

  • by Syberz ( 1170343 ) on Thursday June 16, 2011 @08:05AM (#36461176)

    I'm pretty sure that's he's not worried about losing his right to phone-bomb. Rather, he's worried about the fact that the authorities will be allowed to tap his phone, access his computer and arrest him all without a shred of evidence and because they think that he *might* be doing something illegal like.

  • by gsslay ( 807818 ) on Thursday June 16, 2011 @08:43AM (#36461450)

    What "civil liberties" are you worried about losing? I'm not aware of any that explicitly grant you the ability to phone-bomb some organization.

    The problem is not what is being legislated against, but how it is legislated. Are you unfamiliar with government thinking in cases like these?

    "This phone-bombing was performed by unidentified people with a phone line, therefore we shall make it illegal to use a phone without first routing it through a government controlled call-centre and informing it who you are, where you are, who you are going to phone, and for what reason. Problem solved. The innocent have nothing to fear. Anyone complaining their civil liberties are being removed must have something to hide."

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...