Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Security IT

Samsung Keylogger Stories a False Alarm 183

Trailrunner7 writes "The panic that arose yesterday about Samsung allegedly shipping laptops that contained a pre-installed keylogger turns out to have been a complete mistake after further investigation by security researchers and the company itself. In fact, the controversy was the result of a false positive from one commercial antimalware suite and nothing else. Several outlets reported on Wednesday that Samsung laptops had been found to contain a keylogger known as StarLogger right out of the box from the factory. However, upon closer inspection by security companies, the folder on the laptops that supposedly contained the malware was actually a directory that is part of Windows' multi-language support."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Samsung Keylogger Stories a False Alarm

Comments Filter:
  • epic FAIL (Score:5, Insightful)

    by pasv ( 755179 ) on Thursday March 31, 2011 @09:36AM (#35677212) Homepage
    We believed someone who used a 3rd rate antivirus and didnt verify with a kernel debugger? FAIL on all our parts especially the "security researcher" who so thoroughly researched this one
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 31, 2011 @09:38AM (#35677236)

    Samsung did knowingly put this software on the laptop to, as he put it, "monitor the performance of the machine and to find out how it is being used."

  • Appropriate quote (Score:5, Insightful)

    by _merlin ( 160982 ) on Thursday March 31, 2011 @09:38AM (#35677238) Homepage Journal

    The following fortune quote accompanied this story for me:

    It is not good for a man to be without knowledge, and he who makes haste with his feet misses his way. -- Proverbs 19:2

    Disturbingly appropriate, considering the story is about people jumping all over a false assumption. But I'm constantly surprised at the number of times a Windows installation with full multilingual support trips anti-malware or anti-virus software. Don't these guys even use their MSDN subscriptions to get a full set of Windows installs to test against?

  • by HawkinsD ( 267367 ) on Thursday March 31, 2011 @09:41AM (#35677252)

    At least Slashdot has the journalistic ethics to post the follow-up. Good for them. I note that Network World is doing the same.

    Yes, I said "journalistic" in the same sentence as "Slashdot." It's important.

  • Makes no sense (Score:4, Insightful)

    by StillNeedMoreCoffee ( 123989 ) on Thursday March 31, 2011 @09:44AM (#35677272)

    The earlier article quoted Samsung as admitting to placing the software on their computers to gather information. Either that part of the earlier story is false or the current one is. This is not good journalism.

  • Re:Oh noes (Score:5, Insightful)

    by MarkGriz ( 520778 ) on Thursday March 31, 2011 @09:56AM (#35677394)

    Could? More like should.

    The title of the article was not "Did Samsung install keylogger on its laptop computers?"

    No, the title was "Samsung installs keylogger on its laptop computers", though it looks like they've updated it now to
    "UPDATE: Samsung keylogger could be false alarm"

    Great journalism there. Leap out of the gate screaming "keylogger!!!!" with zero fact checking, but later back off and say "oops we could be wrong"

  • Re:epic FAIL (Score:5, Insightful)

    by John Saffran ( 1763678 ) on Thursday March 31, 2011 @10:09AM (#35677536)
    Not to blow my own horn, but there were some of us who were sceptical of the story until it was proven by independent sources (http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2061772&cid=35673170).

    Basically the qualifications of the author aren't technical and he's commenting on a technical topic and the story was lacking on details so such a big claim couldn't (and shouldn't) be taken at face value without independent validation.

    In this case the independent validation seems to very strongly refute the claim, which is unfortunate for the author's reputation .. I hope he's learned a lesson from this, nobody needs security people talking about things they don't understand.
  • by BitterKraut ( 820348 ) on Thursday March 31, 2011 @10:21AM (#35677640)
    From Samsung's comment at http://www.samsungtomorrow.com/1071 [samsungtomorrow.com] it seems that the security program used identified the folder as StarLogger based solely on the fact that the folder's name is SL for Slovene. Incredible.
  • by LordLimecat ( 1103839 ) on Thursday March 31, 2011 @10:25AM (#35677696)

    This is why they didnt give you a supervisors name, or any further details on the phone call. There was nothing resembling evidence; it was all rumor and assertion.

  • Re:Oh noes (Score:5, Insightful)

    by LordLimecat ( 1103839 ) on Thursday March 31, 2011 @10:30AM (#35677750)

    Everyone who left a comment decrying Samsung in the last article is just as much to blame. You give approval to such antics by your reaction.

  • by sglane81 ( 230749 ) on Thursday March 31, 2011 @10:36AM (#35677818) Homepage

    Not to mention these gems:

    I installed ... security software ... The scan found two instances of a commercial keylogger called StarLogger ... This key logger is completely undetectable ...

    So, this program found something which couldn't be found. Check.

    After an in-depth analysis of the laptop, my conclusion was that this software was installed by the manufacturer, Samsung. I removed the keylogger software, cleaned up the laptop

    Removed the keylogger by removing the folder? Check.

    I found the same StarLogger software in the c:\windows\SL folder of the new laptop. The findings are false-positive proof since I have used the tool that discovered it for six years now and I am yet to see it misidentify an item throughout the years.

    So, "false-positive proof." Good to know that your extensive experience running an anti-virus program has yielded perfect results. Don't worry about the fact that you don't actually know what you're talking about.

    ... logged incident 2101163379 with Samsung Support (SS). First, as Sony BMG did six years ago, the SS personnel denied ... SS changed its story ... SS personnel relented and escalated the incident ...

    Can we claim Godwin here? I have a feeling Samsung Support doesn't refer to itself as the SS.

    You obviously have some kind of agenda, Mohamed Hassan, MSIA, CISSP, CISA. I know now to never trust anything NetSec Consulting Corp does. Also, congrats on being an "adjunct professor of Information Systems in the School of Business at the University of Phoenix."

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 31, 2011 @10:55AM (#35678036)

    And the 2010 Foot in Mouth award goes to...

    The writer AND the "security researcher" both of whom put the credibility of their school, degree, and certifications at risk.

    I sense two egos deflated for the better.

    You should really included Slashdot community there as well, as we jumped on crucifying them based on no evidence whatsoever, just the word of a random blogger.

    "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence"
    -- Carl Sagan

  • by Blakey Rat ( 99501 ) on Thursday March 31, 2011 @12:14PM (#35678874)

    Wouldn't it be better if they updated the *original* story with the correction, instead of posting a new one?

    Anybody linking to this story on Slashdot is still linking to an uncorrected version. It's not enough to correct the article; you have to correct the article at the same URL.

It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.

Working...