Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
IT

IT Turf Wars: the Most Common Feuds In Tech 217

snydeq writes "InfoWorld's Dan Tynan reports on the most common feuds in tech: turf wars in the IT department. 'IT pros do battle every day — with cyber attackers, stubborn hardware, buggy software, clueless users, and the endless demands of other departments within their organization. But few can compare to the conflicts raging within IT itself.' Dev vs. ops, staff vs. management — taking flak from fellow IT pros has become all too common in today's highly territorial IT organizations."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

IT Turf Wars: the Most Common Feuds In Tech

Comments Filter:
  • by Just Some Guy ( 3352 ) <kirk+slashdot@strauser.com> on Monday February 14, 2011 @12:53PM (#35200392) Homepage Journal

    I admit: my first reaction is that if I worked security at your company, I'd want to kick your ass. I mean, I like you, but they probably have a very valid point about not wanting untrusted apps popping up all over the place.

    But my second reaction was that you're right. There's no valid reason why you can't have unsecured guests on the holy internal wifi. We have an open WLAN here at the office, but it's firewalled away from anything we actually care about, with exceptions on a case-by-case basis. You don't get open access to the database server just because you're connecting to our corporate wifi. If your security guys can't handle that, then, well, sucks to be them. Good for you for finding away to make people actually do their jobs.

  • The cycle to hell. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by nosfucious ( 157958 ) on Monday February 14, 2011 @12:59PM (#35200458)

    Sigh.

    Daily life around here.

    Marketing wants what marketing wants. To hell if it has a positive cost/benefit ratio. "Nice and shiny and uses lots of Flash ... and runs on my iPhone ... drool"

    Devs dev what marketing wants. Dev only wants to dev in production. As Administrator/root/qsecofr (or ALLOBJ).

    IT Management, but especially Finance Magement skimp of every possible detail until they end up spending more time AND money patching it until it would have been cheaper to do it the way joint Ops/Securty said it would.

    Ops/Security is handed a dogs breakfast of non-working, insecure code that produces amiguous, and often wrong results. Last to find out or provide input. But it's our fault when it doesn't work, or opens all security doors, or breaches laws in several countries. (The last ones to touch it must have broken it).

    Classic way NOT to do it.

Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer

Working...