Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Crime EU Security United Kingdom IT

Police Arrest Five Over Anonymous Attacks 295

nk497 writes "Five people have been arrested in the UK, accused of taking part in Anonymous' DDOS attacks in support of WikiLeaks. The five men — aged from 15 to 26 — are still being held by police for questioning. Met Police said the investigation was a collaborative effort between forces in the UK, EU and the US."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Police Arrest Five Over Anonymous Attacks

Comments Filter:
  • Re:5 people.., (Score:4, Interesting)

    by serviscope_minor ( 664417 ) on Thursday January 27, 2011 @11:02AM (#35019888) Journal

    Tell the small mom and pop site that uses PayPal to do its business that losing a day or two of income is just a "prank" and not a serious crime.

    Try telling wikileaks that the government pressuring businesses to censor because it would be illegal for them to do it directly is fine and not a serious breach of the constitution.

    And there is more than one type of cop in the world. Some go after murderers, some go after embezzlers and some go after cybercriminals.

    And yet none of them go after the real perpetrators, it would seem.

  • Re:5 people.., (Score:4, Interesting)

    by sumdumass ( 711423 ) on Thursday January 27, 2011 @11:54AM (#35020546) Journal

    Try telling wikileaks that the government pressuring businesses to censor because it would be illegal for them to do it directly is fine and not a serious breach of the constitution.

    Despite there being little to no evidence outside of innuendo wishful thinking of that ever happening, since when has it ever been a moral or legal right to commit a crime because someone that doesn't directly influence you committed one that didn't directly influence you?

    Two wrongs don't make a Right. Three rights make a left however.

    And yet none of them go after the real perpetrators, it would seem.

    Maybe this is only perception and the level of stupidity associated with the crime. You see, most organized (or otherwise) criminals don't want their name associated with a crime nor do they want publicity about the crime. This is especially true if they want to repeat the offense.Some do, and they get caught. So they take steps to hide the entire fact that a crime has happened in the first place in order to be able to commit the crime again and again. What happened here is sort of a complete reversal. These idiots wanted the publicity because it served their purpose. So obviously, when you depart from the entire, I hope no one ever finds out about this line and go with the I hope everyone see this, you are going to attract more eyes to looking for who is behind it and hence more arrests and accusations to the more publicly known crimes.

  • Re:Well Duh (Score:5, Interesting)

    by HungryHobo ( 1314109 ) on Thursday January 27, 2011 @11:56AM (#35020566)

    Well the way they terminated the contract was shifty enough to get them hauled over the coals by the regulators in at least one country.

    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/mastercard-visa-licenses-revoked-iceland-wikileaks/ [rawstory.com]

I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.

Working...