Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Spam

One Man's Fight Against Forum Spam 245

JWSmythe writes "Free Internet Press has an interview with 'Random Digilante,' an anonymous hacker who has been taking over forum spammers' email accounts, and notifying forum operators to delete those accounts. It looks like his reasoning is sound, and his methods are safe, where he won't hurt any real users."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

One Man's Fight Against Forum Spam

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Illegal (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @01:02PM (#33796020)
    Deal with it.
  • So silly.... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by catbutt ( 469582 ) on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @01:02PM (#33796024)
    Forum spam is best solved with good forum software. A good karma system is probably the best solution. I've never seen spam on slashdot (unless I dig through the low rated posts).
  • by hedwards ( 940851 ) on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @01:27PM (#33796396)
    Actually, the media underhypes it if anything. Sure as far back as Vietnam, and probably earlier there were gays serving more or less openly. The problem though is that as soon as one of them starts doing something which arouses too much attention or makes somebody jealous or gets a promotion that somebody else wanted.

    There's a reason why there's a difference between de juris and de facto in these cases. Hell, even if you manage to make it 18 years, there's cases where people get outed and booted anyways.

    As for the matter at hand, what he's doing is illegal, and he's ultimately risking the same sort of consequences that those that haxxor other people's machines to send spam face. Assuming they were actually caught.
  • by elrous0 ( 869638 ) * on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @01:36PM (#33796512)
    It would be nice to live in a world where whistleblowers and positive vigilantes were rewarded for their actions. But, in the vast majority of cases, these people end up in more trouble than the scumbags they're exposing and fighting. This guy will probably end up with more legal trouble for fighting spam than the spammers themselves will ever face for their network-clogging, frequently illegal, openly harassing activities.
  • by rhizome ( 115711 ) on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @01:55PM (#33796822) Homepage Journal

    Now the key thing with both of these kinds of spambots is that they do not include any links initially. A couple weeks after posting they come back and change their signature, which results in spam links appearing under all of their previous posts.

    You might consider disabling .sigs.

  • Re:So silly.... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by clone53421 ( 1310749 ) on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @01:58PM (#33796888) Journal

    I, and lots of other people, read at -1. Don’t assume that just because you’re starting at 0 nobody will read your post; Anonymous Coward posts at 0 by default.

    If you want to get your karma back up, here are a few things to keep in mind. They may or may not help, but hey, it’s free advice.

    Post early. Don’t post often. Make sure you aren’t just repeating someone else’s post. Funny doesn’t give you karma. Funny+Troll burns karma quickly. Sometimes it’s what you say. Sometimes it’s how you say it.

  • Re:Illegal (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Bobfrankly1 ( 1043848 ) on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @02:13PM (#33797112)

    I dislike people who have their POP clients set to download email every minute and process it using filters to put any email from me into a special folder. Does that give me the right to then hack their email accounts and take them over? Using the logic RD outlined above, it very much does. Which should show just how spurious his logic is.

    The POP using people you describe are taking their email and sorting it how they want to within their own mailbox. You may not like it, but it's their space.
    The forum spammers you're comparing them to use their e-mail address and software with the sole purpose of invading his website, which he pays real money for, and spends time maintaining, and which other people use to have conversations. The spammers further use this software to stuff his website with ads for pills, child porn, and other nastiness. This slows down his server (due to the load of fake accounts registering and posting) and can make his forums unreadable, driving away users. If his forums use ads, driving away users means a monetary loss

    Your comparison is invalid, and your attempt at logic is laughable. They broke into his property, he kicked them out and took away their crowbar, which they signed up for under false pretenses.

  • Make a filter (Score:5, Insightful)

    by improfane ( 855034 ) * on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @02:24PM (#33797296) Journal

    Make a filter that detects his notifications and deletes the account automatically.

    He is trying to help and he is fighting.

    What are you doing about it? You're not helping anyone except of course protecting your advertising on your site.

  • Re:So silly.... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Critical Facilities ( 850111 ) on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @02:51PM (#33797782)

    I have been on /. for years, have never posted anything remotely spammy, have attempted to participate in discussions... so why is my karma set at "bad"?

    Well, it seems that you've only submitted 5 comments in the last couple of years, so you're not exactly participating in a lot of conversations. Thus, you're not really "improving" (term used loosely) any of the comment threads, and therefore not receiving any good karma.

    Not trying to be snarky here, I'm genuinely surprised you didn't realize this.

  • Re:Illegal (Score:3, Insightful)

    by RocketRabbit ( 830691 ) on Wednesday October 06, 2010 @03:11AM (#33805120)

    "There is a reason why the laws are created by the society as whole and not a single person or a group with single interest."

    Since when? Most of the laws created since I have been alive have been created by groups with single interests, who get them passed by graft.

    Disobeying an unjust law is patriotic.

The Tao doesn't take sides; it gives birth to both wins and losses. The Guru doesn't take sides; she welcomes both hackers and lusers.

Working...