Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Upgrades Portables Hardware

ARM Launches Cortex-A5 Processor, To Take On Atom 176

bigwophh writes "ARM launched its new Cortex-A5 processor (codenamed Sparrow) this week, and while it's not targeted at the top end of the mobile market, it is a significant launch nonetheless. The Cortex-A5, which will likely battle future iterations of Intel's Atom for market share, is an important step forward for ARM for several reasons. First, it's significantly more efficient to build than the company's older ARM1176JZ(F)-S, while simultaneously outperforming the ARM926EJ-S. The Cortex-A5, however, is more than just a faster ARM processor. Architecturally, it's identical to the more advanced Cortex-A9, and it supports the same features as that part as well. This flexibility is designed to give product developers and manufacturers access to a fully backwards-compatible processor with better thermal and performance characteristics than the previous generation."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

ARM Launches Cortex-A5 Processor, To Take On Atom

Comments Filter:
  • by hyades1 ( 1149581 ) <hyades1@hotmail.com> on Sunday October 25, 2009 @03:29AM (#29862851)

    We really have to start looking more carefully at posts like this, which clearly contain entire paragraphs of unexamined assertions by company PR drones that may or may not be true. Bottom line: Kill this shit unless a trustworthy, honest reviewer with a decent track record says it. If that isn't happening, quit posting it here, where we have more important stuff to spend time on.

    By the way, that "more important stuff" includes pulling our dicks and/or replaying World Championship Monopoly games move by move.

  • by Kupfernigk ( 1190345 ) on Sunday October 25, 2009 @06:07AM (#29863275)
    "Exponentially" means according to a function in which one of the terms is a constant raised to a term which includes the power of the x variable. It is not a synonym for "many times", and it cannot apply to something which is, even instantaneously, a constant, since it can only refer to a function. If you mean that the number of MIPS/Linux applications increases linearly while that of X86 functions is increasing exponentially you might have a point - except that, at any moment in time without more information, this would not tell you which function was largest or had the largest gradient.

    You have to expect pedantry, this is Slashdot.

Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way.

Working...