Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Businesses IT

Retired Mainframe Pros Lured Back Into Workforce 223

Posted by ScuttleMonkey
from the come-back-so-we-can-fire-you-again dept.
itwbennett writes "Businesses that cut experienced mainframe administrators in an effort to cut costs inadvertently created a skills shortage that is coming back to bite them. Chris O'Malley, CA's mainframe business executive VP, says that mainframe workers were let go because 'it had no immediate effect and the organizations didn't expect to keep mainframes around.' But businesses have kept mainframes around and now they are struggling to find engineers. Prycroft Six managing director Greg Price, a mainframe veteran of some 45 years, put it this way: 'Mainframes are expensive, ergo businesses want to go to cheaper platforms, but [those platforms] have a lot of packaged overheads. If you do a total cost of ownership, the mainframe comes out cheaper, but since the costs of a mainframe are immediately obvious, it is hard to get it past the bean-counters of an organization.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Retired Mainframe Pros Lured Back Into Workforce

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 10 2009, @06:36PM (#28655691)

    Web "programmer"... Hahaha, good one!

  • I wonder... (Score:4, Funny)

    by fuzzyfuzzyfungus (1223518) on Friday July 10 2009, @06:49PM (#28655827) Journal
    If recruitment would be any easier if the offer included the right to shout "Where is your 'right-sizing' now, bitches?" into the face of the nearest PHB at will, in addition to the fat salary?
  • Oblig. Ref. (Score:4, Funny)

    by dugrrr (582161) on Friday July 10 2009, @06:58PM (#28655907)
    from BSG: "Any return to COBOL will exact a price paid in blood."
  • by mcrbids (148650) on Friday July 10 2009, @07:00PM (#28655913) Journal

    But bloody hell, if I can make six figures writing cobol, I'll grab myself a cobol book and quit this programming job. A sucky day job isn't so bad when it means you can retire a decade earlier than otherwise.

    My advice for new programmers has been exactly this: learn COBOL, study mainframes, move to large cities, make big bucks. Sure, you'll want to gouge your eyes out with a fork, but then you'll be able to afford to have robotic eyes grafted back in!

    As a second, I recommend that they learn Unix skills, c, and databases. Still lots of money there, and your original eyeballs will last longer. (It's the path I chose, and I do quite well for myself)

  • by cyber-vandal (148830) on Friday July 10 2009, @07:05PM (#28655957) Homepage

    What would the advantage be in highering a coder? It would be more difficult to reach the keyboard for a start.

  • by John Hasler (414242) on Friday July 10 2009, @07:09PM (#28655983) Homepage

    "Sam? Sam, this is Frank, CIO back at Engulf and Devour. How is the transition away from the mainframe going? Well, listen. That's what I'm calling about. Yes, yes, I know you're retired, but the cloud isn't working out quite as we'd planned, what with the economy and all, and the kids are having a bit of trouble keeping ol' Betsy going. Yes, I did read that memo you wrote, and it turns out you had some good points. Listen, would you be up for a bit of consulting? Say, $100/hr, 100 hours minimum? Oh. That much? And a car and driver? Well, I'm afraid my budget won't quite stretch that far...No! Please don't hang up! Let me talk to the CEO and get back to you, ok? Please?"

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 10 2009, @07:20PM (#28656049)
    There was a programmer back in the 1990's that didn't want to mess with the whole Y2K issue. So he cryogenically had himself frozen, hoping that some day (after Y2K) he would be revived and live out his days peacefully.

    Some years later, sure enough he wakes up. Asking the nearest person what year it is, they reply, "It's the year 9999 and we need a COBOL programmer to help with this Y10K problem!"

    Yeah, it's an old joke. Now GOML!
  • by ls671 (1122017) * on Friday July 10 2009, @07:28PM (#28656111) Homepage

    > Why would you higher a "Cobol" coder to program Cobol

    Because most "web programmers" we know of do not know how to spell. Our COBOL programming interface (terminal based) doesn't have auto-completion or auto-correction features so misspelled words cause errors only when the programmer hits the compile key.

    Compiler errors are cryptic and it takes a lot of time to find and fix the misspellings. So even if the logic of the code was flawless (for which we also have doubts), simple spelling errors cost us too much money thus making HIRING web developers a non viable alternative for us.

  • by DNS-and-BIND (461968) on Friday July 10 2009, @08:32PM (#28656543) Homepage
    What do you mean? COBOL is such an easy language, it uses natural sentence construction. Why do you need specialized programmers, anyway? It can be easily used by managers to generate reports and suchlike.

    There's this new language on the horizon, though - it "basically" makes programming a snap for non-programmers, and is likely to eliminate the job of programmers entirely except for a few high-level system engineering projects.

  • by the linux geek (799780) on Friday July 10 2009, @08:54PM (#28656697)
    Also from the Tao of Programming: The Tao gave birth to machine language. Machine language gave birth to the assembler. The assembler gave birth to the compiler. Now there are ten thousand languages. Each language has its purpose, however humble. Each language expresses the Yin and Yang of software. Each language has its place within the Tao. But do not program in COBOL if you can avoid it.
  • by BluBrick (1924) <(blubrick) (at) (gmail.com)> on Friday July 10 2009, @09:14PM (#28656821) Homepage

    Hey!

    ***

    I quite enjoyed TSO

    ***

    Oh wait

    ***

    That was ISPF that I enjoyed.

    ***

  • ... simple spelling errors cost us too much money thus making HIRING web developers a non viable alternative for us.

    Did you mean "non-viable"? Syntax is important too.

  • by Ex-MislTech (557759) on Saturday July 11 2009, @03:50AM (#28658349)

    Mr. Balmer go back to bed, you can count your stock options tomorrow to feel better.

Do not worry about which side your bread is buttered on: you eat BOTH sides.

Working...