Schneier Says We Don't Need a Cybersecurity Czar 173
Trailrunner7 writes "Threatpost.com reports that security guru Bruce Schneier says not only should the NSA not run cybersecurity for the federal government, no one should. 'Really what I think is it shouldn't be anybody. We do better without a top-down hierarchy. Our economic and political systems work best when there isn't a dictator in charge, when there isn't one organization in charge. My feeling is there shouldn't be one organization in charge. Not only shouldn't it be the NSA, it shouldn't be anybody,' Schneier said."
No overlord necessary. (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Makes sense (Score:5, Funny)
Bruce Schneier Facts (Score:4, Funny)
Bruce Schneier's secure handshake is so strong, you won't be able to exchange keys with anyone else for days.
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/ [geekz.co.uk]
Re:Makes sense (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Maybe someone to keep the feet on the fire? (Score:3, Funny)
We need someone to do penetration testing with a white hat on.
Can I use my wizard hat and robe instead?
Czar is no good (Score:1, Funny)
The Czar thing didn't work in Russia. They aren't good at rescueing things in the time of crisis.
Besides, why not appoint some more authentic American character? How about Security Superman?
And change the 'S' on the shield to 'SS'?
CyberNazi's? (Score:1, Funny)