Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Security Communications

Schneier Asks Why We Accept Fax Signatures 531

Posted by timothy
from the emperor's-new-clothes dept.
Bruce Schneier's latest commentary looks into one of my pet peeves: faxed signature requirements. He writes "Aren't fax signatures the weirdest thing? It's trivial to cut and paste -- with real scissors and glue -- anyone's signature onto a document so that it'll look real when faxed. There is so little security in fax signatures that it's mind-boggling that anyone accepts them. Yet people do, all the time. I've signed book contracts, credit card authorizations, nondisclosure..." It's amazing how organizations are sometimes willing to accept low-quality, unverified scans delivered over POTS as authoritative, when they won't take the same information in a high-resolution scan delivered over (relatively secure) email.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Schneier Asks Why We Accept Fax Signatures

Comments Filter:

If I have seen farther than others, it is because I was standing on the shoulders of giants. -- Isaac Newton

Working...