MySpace Wins $230 Million Judgment Against Sanford Wallace 160
smooth wombat writes "Apparently some people just don't take the hint. The latest story in the Sanford Wallace spamming saga is a $230 million verdict against Wallace and his partner, Walter Rines, when they failed to show up in court.
Wallace and Rines were accused by MySpace of creating their own accounts and taking over other accounts through phishing scams, and then using those accounts to send out bogus emails to other members. The emails sent would indicate a video or web site but when people would go to the link, the two would make money through the number of hits generated or they would try to sell something such as ring tones.
According to MySpace, the pair sent over 730,000 emails to members which resulted in bandwidth and delivery-related costs as well as complaints from hundreds of members. The 2003 CAN-SPAM Act allows MySpace to collect $100 per violation or triple that amount when the spam is sent 'willfully and knowingly.'"
Where in the world is Sanford Wallace? (Score:4, Insightful)
Well, MySpace sort of won (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Aw, crap. (Score:5, Insightful)
Spammers, however, reach out and touch me in ways I don't like to be touched. Kill 'em with fire.
Courts are not the answer (Score:3, Insightful)
Note the contradictory statement FTA:
The judgment is a big victory for MySpace, although service providers often have a tough time collecting such awards.
I'd hazard a guess whatever MySpace collects it's still gonna end up costing them more in attorney fees than they could have spent on a technological solution.
Five years after CAN-SPAM and spam is at an all-time high. CAN-SPAM hasn't even made a dent.
The real problem with CAN-SPAM is that it's an extremely inefficient way of stopping something that could be accomplished more elegantly with technology.
Indeed, the reason my inbox isn't filled with spam is because of real-time black holes and filters, *not* because of CAN-SPAM.
If only the lawyers were programmers.
Re:MySpace **IS** Spam... (Score:3, Insightful)
The large sum pretty much means that no matter how much money he makes between now and then he stands to lose all of it the moment he's found.
Re:frivolous (Score:5, Insightful)
$300 dollars per spam seems excessive when the average return per spam mail probably lies far below $1.
And besides, these assholes are doing the same thing and worse in a variety of places. If you hit them hard enough on the ones you catch them doing hopefully they'll stop doing it elsewhere as well.
Re:Courts are not the answer (Score:3, Insightful)
I sincerely doubt that, at least, I doubt you're in the minority here. The CAN-SPAM act basically says that your corporate overlords CAN-SPAM you with impunity.
Five years after CAN-SPAM and spam is at an all-time high.
That's because it's a bad law. Had they actually outlawed unsolicited commercial email with jail time for spammers and financial remedies to Joe Public and his Windows box, it may have alleviated spam somewhat, or at least moved its operators overseas (not that you'd get any less spam).
They do take some hints... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Death to Spammers! (Score:3, Insightful)
Every species preys on its own. Every species has its deviants. Did you know that there are ants who will make alcohol, and they can actually imbibe it and be intoxicated, but if they are caught making it or using it they are killed? Did you know that baby eagles eat their nestmates if they hatch too much later? Did you know, you know, anything about animals, or the fact that we are some?
Re:Criminal investigation? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Spamford Wallace! (Score:3, Insightful)
However, she's probably the ONLY spammer you won't hear from again. Spamford Wallace, Alan Ralsky, Scott Richter, Michael Lindsay, are all names that will keep coming back. The fact that they're not all serving life in jail doing hard labour is proof that (a) the Can-Spam law doesn't work, and (b) countries have to start working together to castrate these SOBs.
As long as they're alive, they'll try to scam people. Internet spam is the 'niche' that they're best at, but they'll do whatever it takes to steal money and then defend themselves indignantly and self-righteously.
Re:Where in the world is Sanford Wallace? (Score:5, Insightful)