Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Spam Government The Courts News Your Rights Online

Judge In e360 Vs. Comcast Rules e360 a Spammer 156

Brielle Bruns writes "Yesterday, Judge James B. Zagel dismissed claims against Comcast by e360. In the decision, the judge says: 'Plaintiff e360Insight, LLC is a marketer. It refers to itself as an Internet marketing company. Some, perhaps even a majority of people in this country, would call it a spammer.' This clears the path for Comcast's counter-suit." e360 is the spammer that got a default judgement against Spamhaus, as we have discussed on numerous occasions.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Judge In e360 Vs. Comcast Rules e360 a Spammer

Comments Filter:
  • by ivan256 ( 17499 ) on Friday April 11, 2008 @12:06PM (#23037398)
    Every week I fill a 35 gallon trash bag with junk mail. I then pay to throw out (recycle) said bag of junk mail. Entire cost, my ass.

    In municipalities that provide trash collection, the government ends up paying that part of the costs of direct mail advertising.
  • by BenSchuarmer ( 922752 ) on Friday April 11, 2008 @12:28PM (#23037666)
    Contact the advertisers and tell them to take you off their list. Unlike spammers, junk mailers generally honor opt-out requests (they don't want to pay for paper and postage if you tell them there's no chance you'll buy something from them).
  • by L0stm4n ( 322418 ) on Friday April 11, 2008 @12:44PM (#23037826) Homepage

    The other one is virtual. The energy it costs to deliver it to you is negligible, as is the required
    energy to properly dispose of it. (hit delete)

    Oh yeah, also if you have a decent spam filter you will RARELY get unsolicited emails.

    There is NO DECENT FILTER for snail spam.
    It costs money to power the antispam machines, the extra machines needed to process the mail that gets through and wasted time of people deleting it. I used to work for an ISP/hosting joint. Small mom and pop place. 1 server would have been plenty to deal with our load, except for the spam. a couple hundred domains spam going through our mailservers forced us to cluster up to 6 machines to deal with the filtering.

    I can sort my snailmail spam from real mail in a couple seconds. With electronic spam I have to tweak filters and still end up deleting a good amount from my inbox which takes time.
  • by Firethorn ( 177587 ) on Friday April 11, 2008 @12:51PM (#23037930) Homepage Journal
    It's your option to shred, toss, or burn the mail in a furnace in the wintertime.

    Still, the [i]majority[/i] of the costs are borne by the mailer, thus resulting in limites to the amount, and at least some specifivity. Not to mention that in order to get the best rates you have to identify yourself to the post office pretty well. This limits the amount of scamming that can be done as the scammers are normally stuck paying first class if they want to do anonymous drops. That increases costs to the point it has to be a very good scam or very selectively mailed if the scammer is to have any hope of making money and avoiding the postal police.
  • by geekboy642 ( 799087 ) on Friday April 11, 2008 @01:05PM (#23038092) Journal
    Careful, your ignorance is showing. Do you honestly believe there are no ways to block junk mail before it is delivered? Here's a helpful exercise: every time you find something you don't know, throw it into Google and skim the first five links or so. Here's what my 10 seconds of casual effort dug up:

    This will block 90%+ of junk mail, and I actually signed up months ago. The only junk mail I get is a local free newspaper that just gets stuffed into every box regardless.
    http://www.dmaconsumers.org/consumerassistance.php [dmaconsumers.org]

    This thing is pure gold. It will block ALL of those "pre-approved" credit card offers. You know the ones, they come with a 29.99% APR, a $650 limit, and yearly fees? Well, at least the ones my wife gets do. I signed up on this thing and I haven't had a single one since.
    https://www.optoutprescreen.com/ [optoutprescreen.com]
  • by sherriw ( 794536 ) on Friday April 11, 2008 @01:08PM (#23038118)
    There's no need to shred un-addressed junk mail (like flyers). If you are getting junk / offers addressed directly to you, I've had good results with calling those companies and asking to be removed from their mailing lists. Typically they don't want to pay the postage for mailing to an uninterested person.

    Now I get essentially zero addressed junk mail.
  • by D'Arque Bishop ( 84624 ) on Friday April 11, 2008 @01:51PM (#23038562) Homepage
    Leaves them right where they were before. e360 won default judgment against Spamhaus because Spamhaus didn't even deign come to court. This is, of course, because Spamhaus operates totally outside the jurisdiction of US courts, and they simply don't care.

    IANAL, but actually, that's not QUITE accurate. If Spamhaus had said to begin with that the US courts lacked jurisdiction, that would have been the end of it and e360 would not have won anything. However, Spamhaus claimed in state court that the suit belonged in federal court, thus acknowledging that the federal courts had jurisdiction. THEN they didn't bother to show up in court, and lost a default judgement.

    Now, whether e360 can get anything out of them is another matter entirely, but they probably could have avoided the whole mess by denying the US courts had jurisdiction in the first place...
  • by zerocool^ ( 112121 ) on Friday April 11, 2008 @01:51PM (#23038564) Homepage Journal
    For those who are skeptical (and i'm one) regarding the fraud or non-fraud of optoutprescreen.com, See this:

    One: Verisign signature.

    SITE NAME: www.optoutprescreen.com

    SSL CERTIFICATE
    STATUS: Valid (28-Sep-2006 to 18-Oct-2008)

    COMPANY/
    ORGANIZATION: CONSUMER DATA INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION
    Washington
    District of Columbia, US

            Encrypted Data Transmission This Web site can secure your private information using a VeriSign SSL Certificate. Information exchanged with any address beginning with https is encrypted using SSL before transmission.
            Identity Verified CONSUMER DATA INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION has been verified as the owner or operator of the Web site located at www.optoutprescreen.com. Official records confirm CONSUMER DATA INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION as a valid business.


    Two: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/credit/prescreen.shtm [ftc.gov]

    FTC.gov page about the website.

    There are also some blog entries around the web where people have had the same feelings about the website and it's possibility of fraud. As always, do your own research. But it looks legit.

    ~Wx
  • by spikedvodka ( 188722 ) on Friday April 11, 2008 @02:03PM (#23038724)
    Screw that... I followed the instructions at http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/credit/prescreen.shtm [ftc.gov]

    and I get practically 0 junk mail... One place to call/visit, as opposed to haveing to call capital one... amex... etc. etc.
  • It costs the USPS money to deliver it.

    It costs the USPS less to deliver junk mail than the mailer paid.

    It costs the USPS more to deliver personal mail than the mailer paid.

    Junk mail subsidizes personal mail.
  • by MightyYar ( 622222 ) on Friday April 11, 2008 @03:44PM (#23040118)
    1. Get a goat
    2. Feed junk mail to the goat
    3. Drink the goat's milk.
    4. Use the goat dung as fuel (Indian-style).
    5. Eat the goat.

    There are lots of good recipes for goat curry or jerk goat. They don't even mind the plastic envelope windows, and they save you the electricity that you would use to run a shredder.

egrep -n '^[a-z].*\(' $ | sort -t':' +2.0

Working...