Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Security Government The Military News

Inside the Secret War Against Internet Spies 116

ahess247 brings us a lengthy BusinessWeek story on the increasing amount of attacks against the US government's online presence as well as its contacts in the private sector. Hackers are gaining a greater awareness of where valuable data might reside, and that awareness is leading to more precise, more sophisticated attacks. Quoting: "The U.S. government, and its sprawl of defense contractors, have been the victims of an unprecedented rash of similar cyber attacks over the last two years, say current and former U.S. government officials. 'It's espionage on a massive scale,' says Paul B. Kurtz, a former high-ranking national security official. Government agencies reported 12,986 cyber security incidents to the U.S. Homeland Security Dept. last fiscal year, triple the number from two years earlier. Incursions on the military's networks were up 55% last year, says Lieutenant General Charles E. Croom, head of the Pentagon's Joint Task Force for Global Network Operations. Private targets like Booz Allen are just as vulnerable and pose just as much potential security risk. 'They have our information on their networks. They're building our weapon systems. You wouldn't want that in enemy hands,' Croom says. Cyber attackers 'are not denying, disrupting, or destroying operations--yet. But that doesn't mean they don't have the capability.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Inside the Secret War Against Internet Spies

Comments Filter:
  • by virtual_mps ( 62997 ) on Thursday April 10, 2008 @07:35PM (#23031026)

    Spies use any means available to find information. If the Internet helps, they'll use it. That does not change their ornithological classification
    I'm missing what is doubtless a deep and subtle point about spies and birds.
  • by EdIII ( 1114411 ) * on Thursday April 10, 2008 @07:45PM (#23031126)
    He may have meant "ontological" but goofed it up instead with a scientific reference to the study of birds :)

    I could see him thinking about spies, and birds being like spies, and then screwing it up. What I find funnier is how many people will skim over that sentence really quickly and find it smart and intelligent sounding, while never really understanding what ornithology or ontology really is.
  • by pipingguy ( 566974 ) * on Friday April 11, 2008 @01:00AM (#23032946)
    At least he spelled it right.

    What's worse is disagreeing with someone and spouting, "just read these 14 URLs comprising 347,958 words and you'll find out how stupid you really are" rather than putting effort into making some clear statements and taking the time to put coherent thought into words.

    There's not much worse than copypaste advocacy but it's all the rage with those who tend to refer others to talking points and narratives.

8 Catfish = 1 Octo-puss

Working...