Yes, if slashdot did some automated submission comparison like digg, we might actually be able to avoid some of these dupes. Slashdot has a lot to learn from digg, and should copy it in every possible way. Maybe they can keep the cowboy Neal polls just for the nostalgia.
The real story is someone hacked a Diebold voting machine to host Slashdot. Notice how this site is running slower than usual, turning out false stories, and running dupes?
The truth is that "Zonk," "CowboyNeal," etc. are actually just programs running on a server in Wisconsin. But the programs have a serious memory leak problems which only get worse if the server isn't rebooted ever few months. The guy who was supposed to reboot it this time couldn't afford the gas to Wisconsin.
Soon on Slashdot: USA bans images on the internet as a safety method, "Evil hackers posting these so called images danger our protections, and we have to ban them all".
I'm not really sure why anybody would go back to lynx who doesn't already just use it. There just wouldn't be images to view in [browser of preference].
Any country making both democracy and security its highest priorities for years, even at cost of a perpetual state of emergency, suspended liberty, thousands dead and many tens of thousands wounded (multiplied in the non-American casualties), unsupportable debts, alienating allies and activating enemies, would immediately remove these untrustworthy machines and never allow their vendors or technologies into the critical path of its government again.
Such a country would never have allowed such a risk at all, either before or after such vulnerabilities were publicly exposed.
But instead, this story will become a footnote. Precisely because there's an election going on. An election that is threatened by these untrustworthy machines.
Since those priorities were set and executed by a government installed on the reports of these kinds of untrustworthy machines, I guess we've got everything we deserve.
You seem to be misunderstanding the plan. The easiest way of "spreading Democracy" to the parts of the world under the rule of despots and corrupt plutocrats is not ridding the world of despotism and corruption.
No, it's by redefining "Democracy at home" to include despotism and corruption.
But instead, this story will become a footnote. Precisely because there's an election going on. An election that is threatened by these untrustworthy machines.
Although, indeed, appalling, the threat is overblown. AFAIU, it would still require someone to visit each machine in person in order to affect its results. This simply is not enough to sway the overall results of an important election.
Even if the "swingiest" district of the "swingiest" State is attacked via this exploit, the "winner" would still n
Yes, with balances like that a very little bit of fraud can really go far. Such fraud can be performed with or without the hackable voting machines. Like I said, I am not sure, the Diebold machines being discussed make the situation noticeably worse...
"Whether Diebold-machines make the situation worse is not immediately obvious..."
This would depend on your definition of "situation." If you mean "rigging an election" you're right, but if you mean "finding out an election was rigged," you aren't.
My statement isn't a logical fallacy of redefining a label up to deny contradictory evidence. It's a simple statement that the US isn't living up to its basic defining characteristics, even while we base extreme actions on claims of those characteristics. It's a demand that we change, not an excuse that the country isn't guilty of those things. Or do you think that demands to meet expectations, especially expectations that are created by insisting they're essential and to be forced on others, are never reaso
Dupes aside, WTF is with the insane and stupid tags? I thought a system was implemented that would wipe out crap like "haha". It's driven me nuts for a long time and I was glad when the system was "fixed". Looks like it re-broke.
But then, this from the software that STILL doesn't have an edit button!
While this story may be old, it was not a major election year when it ran, and all the e-voting problems still have not been fixed. So it is at least worth mentioning again, I think. Also, this story serves as a reminder that the most fearsome element of malicious "hacking" is not some geek with uber skills in a dark room, it's the information we willingly give out without realizing the danger.
Ok, I done trying to be constructive. I always was mostly a crowd follower, so here goes: Slashdot sucks and I hate them for posting this story.
First it's a bad move to post the actual key on the website. Maybe it works on their ATM:s too?
Second, from the appearance of the key it seems to be a lock that's EXTREMELY easy to pick so the effort to make a copy - even by trial and error - would be small.
So if everybody that knows that Diebold machines are in use during an election makes their own key and just unlocks it and leaves the machine open... That could be for some interesting news. Votes dismissed due to irregularities - 50%. Just make sure that the machines is in the counties populated mostly by your opponent.
And - what stops one from ordering keys from Diebold?
Why would you need to make a key? A lock like that can probably just be raked with a little tension applied in about 10 seconds.
The faith that people put into locks like this is astounding. It is there just to stop people from casually pulling out the card. Anyone who really wants to swap cards still can with relative ease.
Indeed. We all recall the Princeton report earlier this year that described the locks as so ineffective that they could be picked with a "common office implement" in under 30 seconds. Don't we?
SFX: WAVY FLASHBACK LINES
The lock is easily picked--one member of our group, who has modest locksmithing skills, can pick the lock consistently in less than 10 seconds. Alternatively, this slot can be reached by removing screws and opening the machine. Some attackers will have access to keys that can open the lock
Supposedly, the old-fashioned paper ballot method is supposed to be too expensive and in need of replacement. It's awfully hard to pretend when a hundred thousand slips of paper go missing. A rigged e-vote? Who's going to know, as long as the cheaters are even a little creative?
How would you like to explain to the grandkids how you pissed away your democracy because you were too effing cheap to fork out a few bucks to maintain it. Dump these machines, fork out the bucks and do it right. I'd have thou
You don't have to make your own key. Diebold will sell you one. "Replacement Access Keys", part number GS-567311-1000, $5.90/set of 2. Order by phone, 1-800-769-3246. Operators are standing by.
Can someone please explain to me why an electronic voting machine is a Bad Thing(tm)? Just about everyone electronically manages their financial transactions and trusts ATM's, which are arguably more important and touch more people than the 50% (or less) that vote... If we can develop machines that accurately track billions of financial transactions every second, why can't we develop a machine that can count votes? It just seems strange to me they're so vilified. Is it the companies that are developing th
The major difference here is a subtle but important one. With the banking system, if someone manages to get money or goods they are not entitled to, someone will be missing that money or goods and that someone will know about it once they take inventory or reconcile the numbers. These systems are routinely attacked and banks do lose money to fraud, and they invest in security enough so that the cost of fraud is less than the cost of the security measures.
With voting, the party that loses due to fraud is the public, and especially if there is no paper trail, there is no way to prove that any fraud did actually take place. It's very easy to make machines that count votes, it's basically impossible to make those machines such that no one involved could manipulate the results from the election officials, executives, programmers, and voters. With a paper election, the fraud-proofness is guaranteed though the fact that votes are opened with representatives of the various parties in place, and tallies are signed and published so that any fraud could be easily detected by the interested parties.
Can someone please explain to me why an electronic voting machine is a Bad Thing(tm)?
If something goes wrong with your ATM you know it happened right there when it happened, you contact your bank and get it fixed right then. And even then, you don't really *trust* the ATM. At least I hope you take your paper receipt, and check your balance, and if they don't match you can STILL call the bank about it.
If something goes wrong with your voting machine you NEVER know about it, because you don't get any feedback
I worked the Polls in San Diego yesterday as a Precinct Inspector. The Diebold machine we had (for special-needs voters only) did not use this type of key. It needed a key more like a bicycle lock's key.
Yeah, either this is from Digg, or from Reddit. I saw the same old today on Reddit... I haven't bothered comparing the dates to see who was first though. But it's an interesting new problem in social news reporting. News tend to spread like wildfire, but that also includes bad or confusing reporting. This isn't the first time it has happened, at I predict it will become tremendously more common in the future, the more interconnected and popular social news sites like Slashdot (it now is one too especially si
It will stop when Bush's successor (or sucksessor, as the case may be) is chosen. It will start up again in roughly three more years if we don't generally like the government of those four years, either; six, otherwise. You must not be American? That's fine and dandy, after all, this is the World Wide Web. Keep in mind, however, that/. is hosted in America, is run by an American company and has a userbase that is comprised of a majority of Americans. If you are American, then SHAME ON YOU for discouraging p
Can we stop with the "politicizing" of Slashdot. And return to geekiness of nerdworthy news - thank you!
This will never happen. The Slashdot folks found that, prior to the 2004 elections, adding a "Politics" section was click-bait ad revenue heaven. As long as there are politicos here Slashdot trying to shove politics down the rest of our throats (complete with dupes and wrong summaries) is here to stay.
I've got an even better one for stamping out abuse... use paper ballots designed such that each potential vote is listed on one line with a hollow oval at the far end, then have each voter fill in the appropriate dot with a provided pen and run the ballots through a machine designed to read such ballots and compile the results as appropriate. You know, the same way that many institutions grade multiple choice exams.
The best part is that this is not only comprised entirely of existing technology, but that it
Are you being serious? You do know that many people already vote this way, right? I grew up in Missouri and every time I've voted it's been this way. You use a black felt tip marker to fill in the oval by the candidates you want to vote for, then feed it into the machine when you're finished. The "machine" is just a reader on top of a secure "bucket". It reads and tallies immediately... but the paper trail still exists in the case of a recount. The ballots themselves are _very_ easy to understand and ma
I'm in St. Louis County and we have touchscreen machines here, with a paper trail that you can verify, or punch (stylus) machines -- you get to choose. I haven't seen the marker/oval type here.
Reasonably serious. Remember the 2000 elections when the big deal the day after was how confusing and unclear Florida's ballots were in many jurisdictions? Remember how Pat Buchanan managed to win in some communities that were primarily made up of Jewish retirees from the North (a traditionally liberal demographic, and certainly not the types to vote for somebody who is openly anti-semitic)? So you know, the voting process that you (and I) described is exactly how voting works here in Massachusetts as well,
Déjà vu? (Score:5, Informative)
Oh, that's right, this story was covered -- right here on slashdot, no less -- a year ago [slashdot.org], complete with a link to the very same now-year-old blog post [bradblog.com], which was significantly updated [bradblog.com] at the time, and caused Diebold to remove the photo in question! (A very generic key form [freedom-to-tinker.com] was used.) Might want to update this post...
Archives - January 2007 should be a clue. Or at least one would hope.
While you guys are at it, can you fix your patently incorrect story [slashdot.org] about Iran being "offline", when it clearly and provably isn't [slashdot.org], thereby negating the main premise of the story? You know, since no one seems to care about anything sent to the on-duty editor email [wisc.edu].
Slashdot is really on fire today!
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You get digg. If you prefer digg, the address is: http://www.digg.com/ [digg.com].
Although I agree - An automated dupe checker seems appropriate for things like this...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Except that this was a dupe on digg yesterday. Oops! So much for the "automated submission comparison"!
Maybe if the submitters (and /. editors) would actually pay attention to URLs with obvious dates in them?
Re:Déjà vu? (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Déjà vu? (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Details of picture in case of slashdotting (Score:3, Funny)
Pretty damn stupid to use that as a master key.
Re: (Score:2)
USA to the rescue (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Nostalgia: I remember when I understood it.
Slashdotted - link to google cache (Score:2, Informative)
Slashdot (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Slashdot (Score:5, Funny)
Am I reading too much into it?
503 Service Unavailable
The service is not available. Please try again later.
Parent
Spreading Democracy Begins at Home (Score:5, Insightful)
Such a country would never have allowed such a risk at all, either before or after such vulnerabilities were publicly exposed.
But instead, this story will become a footnote. Precisely because there's an election going on. An election that is threatened by these untrustworthy machines.
Since those priorities were set and executed by a government installed on the reports of these kinds of untrustworthy machines, I guess we've got everything we deserve.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
No, it's by redefining "Democracy at home" to include despotism and corruption.
So far, their plan is working well.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Although, indeed, appalling, the threat is overblown. AFAIU, it would still require someone to visit each machine in person in order to affect its results. This simply is not enough to sway the overall results of an important election.
Even if the "swingiest" district of the "swingiest" State is attacked via this exploit, the "winner" would still n
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, with balances like that a very little bit of fraud can really go far. Such fraud can be performed with or without the hackable voting machines. Like I said, I am not sure, the Diebold machines being discussed make the situation noticeably worse...
Re: (Score:2)
This would depend on your definition of "situation." If you mean "rigging an election" you're right, but if you mean "finding out an election was rigged," you aren't.
Re: (Score:2)
Or do you think that demands to meet expectations, especially expectations that are created by insisting they're essential and to be forced on others, are never reaso
Stupid tags (Score:2, Offtopic)
But then, this from the software that STILL doesn't have an edit button!
Well... (Score:5, Funny)
Social Engineering (Score:5, Insightful)
While this story may be old, it was not a major election year when it ran, and all the e-voting problems still have not been fixed. So it is at least worth mentioning again, I think. Also, this story serves as a reminder that the most fearsome element of malicious "hacking" is not some geek with uber skills in a dark room, it's the information we willingly give out without realizing the danger.
Ok, I done trying to be constructive. I always was mostly a crowd follower, so here goes: Slashdot sucks and I hate them for posting this story.
If they'd post the vote... (Score:4, Insightful)
main stream? (Score:2)
E-Voting is officially dead (Score:2)
Bad move (Score:4, Interesting)
Second, from the appearance of the key it seems to be a lock that's EXTREMELY easy to pick so the effort to make a copy - even by trial and error - would be small.
So if everybody that knows that Diebold machines are in use during an election makes their own key and just unlocks it and leaves the machine open... That could be for some interesting news. Votes dismissed due to irregularities - 50%. Just make sure that the machines is in the counties populated mostly by your opponent.
And - what stops one from ordering keys from Diebold?
Re: (Score:2)
The faith that people put into locks like this is astounding. It is there just to stop people from casually pulling out the card. Anyone who really wants to swap cards still can with relative ease.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
SFX: WAVY FLASHBACK LINES
What a joke (Score:2)
Supposedly, the old-fashioned paper ballot method is supposed to be too expensive and in need of replacement. It's awfully hard to pretend when a hundred thousand slips of paper go missing. A rigged e-vote? Who's going to know, as long as the cheaters are even a little creative?
How would you like to explain to the grandkids how you pissed away your democracy because you were too effing cheap to fork out a few bucks to maintain it. Dump these machines, fork out the bucks and do it right. I'd have thou
Just order the key. (Score:2)
You don't have to make your own key. Diebold will sell you one. "Replacement Access Keys", part number GS-567311-1000, $5.90/set of 2. Order by phone, 1-800-769-3246. Operators are standing by.
Spaceballs (Score:2)
Please explain (Score:2)
It just seems strange to me they're so vilified. Is it the companies that are developing th
Re:Please explain (Score:4, Informative)
With voting, the party that loses due to fraud is the public, and especially if there is no paper trail, there is no way to prove that any fraud did actually take place. It's very easy to make machines that count votes, it's basically impossible to make those machines such that no one involved could manipulate the results from the election officials, executives, programmers, and voters. With a paper election, the fraud-proofness is guaranteed though the fact that votes are opened with representatives of the various parties in place, and tallies are signed and published so that any fraud could be easily detected by the interested parties.
Parent
You trust ATMs? (Score:3, Insightful)
If something goes wrong with your ATM you know it happened right there when it happened, you contact your bank and get it fixed right then. And even then, you don't really *trust* the ATM. At least I hope you take your paper receipt, and check your balance, and if they don't match you can STILL call the bank about it.
If something goes wrong with your voting machine you NEVER know about it, because you don't get any feedback
I don't think it unlocks ALL Diebold machines (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
why bother? (Score:2)
(I suppose it may look a little more "official".)
Democracy as Ebay? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But yeah, even that digg story mentioned thats its a dupe, and no news.
But nowadays slashdot has to copy digg dupes. sad.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
But it's an interesting new problem in social news reporting. News tend to spread like wildfire, but that also includes bad or confusing reporting. This isn't the first time it has happened, at I predict it will become tremendously more common in the future, the more interconnected and popular social news sites like Slashdot (it now is one too especially si
Re: (Score:2)
You must not be American? That's fine and dandy, after all, this is the World Wide Web. Keep in mind, however, that
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
This will never happen. The Slashdot folks found that, prior to the 2004 elections, adding a "Politics" section was click-bait ad revenue heaven. As long as there are politicos here Slashdot trying to shove politics down the rest of our throats (complete with dupes and wrong summaries) is here to stay.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You know, the same way that many institutions grade multiple choice exams.
The best part is that this is not only comprised entirely of existing technology, but that it
Re: (Score:2)
I grew up in Missouri and every time I've voted it's been this way. You use a black felt tip marker to fill in the oval by the candidates you want to vote for, then feed it into the machine when you're finished. The "machine" is just a reader on top of a secure "bucket". It reads and tallies immediately... but the paper trail still exists in the case of a recount. The ballots themselves are _very_ easy to understand and ma
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So you know, the voting process that you (and I) described is exactly how voting works here in Massachusetts as well,
Re: (Score:2)