Getting Gouged by Geeks 581
dottyslashdottydot writes "CBC Marketplace recently ran a sting operation and discovered that most home computer repair technicians failed miserably at diagnosing a simple RAM failure. Many techs tried to sell unneccessary software or upgrades. (or even a new computer!) However, the worst offender was one guy who claimed that the hard drive had failed, and that the only remedy was to pay $2,000 to have a special facility with a clean room recover the data."
getting gouged by whom? (Score:5, Insightful)
I have to take a little umbrage at the inflammatory headline, though I suppose the choice of words generates traffic. These people were not being gouged by geeks. They were being gouged by assholes. These are the same assholes who'd sell you a re-built carbeurator to fix a low-transmission fluid problem (it's true, I stopped this guy from doing just that to a good friend).
Most "geeks" I've ever known or met often may suffer social ineptitude, but across the broad spectrum, geeks, IMO, seem the least likely to be the type to pull these ripoffs. Quite the contrary, my experience has been geeks, true geeks who really know technology are the ones far more likely to shrug and take no money for helping someone with technology. That's not to say they're not willing to make a living at it... just that they're not ripoff artists.
Also the story is long on anecdotal "sting" evidence, and short on statistically significant information to substantiate the claim. My advice, ask around, ask a friend you trust, not necessarily to do the work but to give a "yea" or "nay" on any recommendations. Also, if it's a company like "geeks.com", stay away... any company pedalling technicians en-masse on the cheap is suspect... the market doesn't sustain that kind of business model... fixing technology is hard, and not cheap.
Anyway, back to my thesis, this is ripoff by assholes, not geeks.
Just goes to show... (Score:5, Insightful)
In other news... (Score:4, Insightful)
Is it Planned, or is it Ignorance? (Score:5, Insightful)
The end result may manifest itself in the same form, but it doesn't necessarily mean it's malicious. Incompetent? Yes. Scam? Maybe not.
Re:getting gouged by whom? (Score:5, Insightful)
Welcome to the post-Dateline world, where every news agency now wants to set up stings to bust the bad guy. I'd like to set up a sting to expose shitty journalists. I think modern journalism is the one area that seriously needs to be looked in to.
We can start with science journalism, which is now at nearly tabloid levels of accuracy.
Re:I blame windows (Score:5, Insightful)
Depends... (Score:4, Insightful)
If however it was a matter of having a RAM stick with a subtle fault that kicked off only during extremely heavy RAM usage, then you may have had a point there.
Here's the trick, though... most of the 'expose' type stories like this usually involve something incredibly stupid, like loosening a cable or card (Hell, I used to drive students crazy when they were forced to troubleshoot a system I induced failure on with clear cellophane tape on the NIC card contacts).
Much like tweaking the distributor timing a bit on an other3wise perfectly running old car can out the fakes and the incompetents in the auto industry, there are some damned drop-simple ways of outing the scammers and dumbasses in the IT field.
See? Geeks are stupid... (Score:5, Insightful)
"Simple"? (Score:5, Insightful)
And sometimes (Score:4, Insightful)
Now I am thinking WTH this does not make alot of sense. So we canabalized a different computer starting with a different HDD. Same problem. Then the Power supply. Then the RAM. And wallah it started working right. We stuck back in his old components with different RAM and everythign was fine. This took several "geeks" a couple of hours to fix and it was not a by the book type fix. We litterally had to use a process of elimination and had to have extra hardware available.
Alot of people will take the easy road. Especially with older crappy hardware. If somone is running an old Win 98 box and it appears it is a hardware issue.. They are just plainly better off buying a new computer then looking for antiquated parts. Or if it is going to take "days" to fix it may be cost effective to not pay a "tech" to fix it.
Some of the "Geeks" in the parent article may have been ripoff artists.. others may have in the long run been providing the correct response to the situation.
Here, Here! (Score:5, Insightful)
As the parent poster said, it's not that "geeks" in general are untrustworthy. It's assholes that seek to make money off their geekdom that inspire spite. If I had a dollar for every time someone brought me a computer and said "The Guy at Best Buy said the motherboard is dead and it will cost $400 to replace" only for me to go into safemode and remove spyware/virus bloat and fix the computer, I'd be paying someone to make my Slashdot posts for me!
In short, everyone should befriend a geek. If you know a nice geek, you're set. If you don't, then ask around for someone who does. Rarely does hardware need to be replaced, but when it does, you needn't pay sky-high prices to have it done.
A kiss, a chesty hug, a 6-pack, or a warm meal is usually enough.
Re:getting gouged by whom? (Score:3, Insightful)
Zing!
Good techs get business from these guys (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Diagnosing memory failures is hard (Score:2, Insightful)
RAM Failures.. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Is it Planned, or is it Ignorance? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:getting gouged by whom? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:"Simple"? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:getting gouged by whom? (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm glad that Mom and Pop are out there doing a good job at a good price for people in your area, though. More power to them!
Does anyone really think (Score:4, Insightful)
They exist to sensationalize and already existing fear. capitalize on it and sell air time.
If "the market" was really pissed about poor service, believe me, the market would make things change.
Re:Is it Planned, or is it Ignorance? (Score:5, Insightful)
Those who don't know what they don't know aren't rip off artists. A rip off artist knows what they are doing.
Video was a HIT PIECE (Score:5, Insightful)
What pisses me off most about this video is the crap they give the guy who diagnosed the memory problem correctly, yet "gouged" them on replacement memory. This guy installed a 1GB DIMM for $120 and they say they were GOUGED because they went on Newegg and found the same memory for $65. Never mind that $65 doesn't include shipping. Never mind that $65 doesn't include tax. Never mind there is NO B&M STORE IN THE WORLD where you can get goods cheaper than you can get them online. If this lady went to Circuit City I bet the same memory would be at least $120. Yet this guy gets called a crook for doing his job well and charging a reasonable price (not even close to gouging).
This isn't journalism, it's a hit piece.
Re:getting gouged by whom? (Score:5, Insightful)
Now, that is the best idea I've heard in a very long time.
It'd be a lot harder to find a good journalist.
Re:getting gouged by whom? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I just did a job on a few laptops (Score:4, Insightful)
There is a golden rule in business: time is money.
It is nothing unethical to charge for the time that took you to diagnose the problem.
Not charging the diagnose is actually a "free service" provided by technicians to attract customers, but not clearly it is not the normal thing.
Charging ridiculous amounts is unethical, but charging for the time it consumed YOU (whatever it was) is perfectly ok.
In the service business (private teacher, schools, colleges, sky diving lessons, transportation, whatever), whatever service that requires scheduling most of the times they charge you a time slot, if you don't come or come late, they don't refund you the money.
In the Industrial/Goods Business, the product is money.
In the Service Business, Time is money. Much more critically than the goods industry, since it is your only limited and not renewable "raw material" from which you can generate revenues.
Charge for your time.
Re:I've had the opposite happen (Score:3, Insightful)
Serial cable, $10.
Knowing to replace the serial cable...
(blatantly stolen from a previous post, which was stolen from a famous quote, blah blah)
-:sigma.SB
Re:getting gouged by whom? (Score:5, Insightful)
I've had to personally clean up messes that were made by a company that rhymes with "Geek Squad" and quite a few others as well, and can tell you that they push everything that makes them money and that a fair amount of them don't know what the hell they are doing (my buddy who worked there got fired for not selling enough product and not charging a few people for really simple problems). I have seen them and others totally miss easy problems on systems (a cpu cooling fan that is so caked up with so much dust that it doesn't spin), screw up perfectly functioning systems (install a floppy cable backwards, install ram backwards(!), forget to connect little things back up like the hard drive's data cable), and setup networks so badly it's a wonder they even work (Then again the ones I visit are because they don't work and I think it's terrible that they already gave up an arm, leg, and first born to a company which screwed everything up). The specific BSOD's that the bait system should have been putting up (if it is like the one they showed in a little blip in one of the segments) should have been a dead giveaway to anybody with the power of google that the ram, or at the very least some piece of hardware was at fault (not sure how that one fellow suggested the video card, or that other dude the cpu!), although I will say that I would have been a little confused had the customer said it 'just happened' that day, as ram is usually bad from the factory, I would have probably gone into questioning about if the comp had done anything like that previously before I run a memtest)
I personally always find out if a system is under warranty before even breathing upon any hardware inside the machine, never charge anything if I don't or cannot fix it (which although rare does happen ), and I always charge simple cheap fees for things like spyware and viruses, (ei $15-$20) on easily removed stuff (like an hour or so actually spent on it onsite), and involve the customer in any purchasing of parts directly if I can.
My motivation as a tech has always been to teach customers that there is no "magic box", that it is decently easy to maintain, they are not going to break it by looking at it, the internals are nothing to be afraid of (no they won't get shocked adding ram), they can live a happy online computer life by staying away from bad sites, not using IE or Outlook in most cases is the best, updating AV and spyware defs is a good thing running windows, using something called "google" to find answers to questions can prevent hair loss, and I also go the extra step and teach them methods of searching forums for answers to any given computer problem(also how NOT to use the caps lock key if they do post).
so I generally tell them anything they want to learn. Companies, and freelancers who are thieves, or don't know how to fix things give our trade a terrible name, and as long as there is money to be made, they will be with us making everyones lifes slightly worse off. Computer repair is tedious, and you have to really love or enjoy it to make your customers happy. I know nothing feels better to me than rescuing someone's vacation pictures from a hard drive that is on it's last legs with the dreaded "click of death" in fornt of their eyes, take em to the store to get another hdd, load everything back and be done and have them running in less than an hour and less than $100.)
I should probably say more about the actual video now, because I derailed my train and went into a rant.
Nothing on that tape surprised me sadly, there have always been bad techs around, and there have always been good techs who are told to 'add' something to the bottom line by their bosses at risk of loosing their jobs. I never have thought that the so called "formal training" or certs give you the ability to troubleshoot any given machine. If someone is gonna slack off and not pay attention, they will, and retain enough of it that they can pass a multiple choice test. I guess I didn't get my rant completed.. oh well, take it easy everyone.
Re:See? Geeks are stupid... (Score:3, Insightful)
Did the geeks charge..... (Score:4, Insightful)
$1000 per "point" of processor speed?
$350 document transfer fee?
$650 document research fee?
$350 document copying fee?
$75 long distance phone calls?
If the customers were lawyers and mortgage bankers, I think they did not charge enough. I suggest investigative reporting spend more effort investigating lawyers and financial service companies first.
Re:Depends... (Score:3, Insightful)
You really can't fix things with hardware failures in the field, and if you do it SHOULD cost a lot. $120 for a 1GB dimm? With field support? That's a great deal.
It's totally unfair for them to look up on some website a cheap mailorder price for the DIMM and comment that the field service delivered price is double. It HAS to be double! It should probably be triple.
If you want your hardware at the cheapest internet price you don't get customer service with it and you should order it and be ready to install it yourself.
That show was completely unfair.
Not that we didn't see some instances of incompetence and dishonesty, we sure did and there is no excuse for that. But field service should be reserved for software issues.
If you have a hardware failure you should take it somewhere that they have parts on hand, like a computer store that DOES sell motherboards and parts- hopefully one you have some sort of relationship with. Not to Bestbuy, Staples, or another chain like that. That's just ridiculous.
Fortunately most people's computer problems are very simple, or we really couldn't fix them. Now my computer problems, I already fixed the simple ones. The ones that are left are are insurmountable. Heh.
Those greedy geeks... (Score:1, Insightful)
Oh, we're not talking about those geeks? Then I guess you're right, geeks are greedy.
Re:getting gouged by whom? (Score:5, Insightful)
perhaps not so simple? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:getting gouged by whom? (Score:4, Insightful)
What do you propose? The Department of Auto Mechanics and the Computer Repair Agency? We'll need the Senate Hairdressers Oversight Committee and the Federal Landscaping Commission, too. Don't forget the government watchdogs to keep track of wayward newspaper boys who can't land it on the porch.
Seriously, that's what consumer reports and the Internet are for.
Re:getting gouged by whom? (Score:4, Insightful)
Who cares about haircuts? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:getting gouged by whom? (Score:5, Insightful)
Back in the day it really was not a common problem, and the cases of it I remember were easy to diagnose because the comp would not even post. My personal first diagnoses I made of bad ram (that posts fine and 'looks' fine) back in '95 or so really had me pulling my hair out. I eventually tore the whole computer apart, set it up on a bench, and tested each part individually to figure it out, when I found it was the ram I was shocked. (it also didn't help having a 28.8kb dial up connection to the web, no affordable cd burner even on the horizon, and a lack of good low kb free tools)
Anyway, I beg to differ that bad ram is rare, I've had loads of bad ram since they released sticks with 512MB and over.
It's been so bad for me, I don't let a rig go to someone 'till it passes 2 times with memtest.
I've bought 3 laptops for me and my family in the last year from retail stores, and 2 came to me with at least 1 bad ddr2 module, and I see it very often on customer computers. Ususally I am the last resort before it gets the dumpster or sent back, when it ends up being a simple ram issue.
now you might say, wait a min, that's if you only use crappy ram, but I've gotten bad ram from everybody from corsair, kingston, crucial, PQI, patriot, micron oem, and a slew of others using any kind of chip, as well as straight from a big computer factory, where they are supposed to test it before it leaves. I've seen it in servers, workstations, desktops, notebooks, you name it, I probably have a bad stick of it somewhere in my room. Most everyone I've dealt with has great return programs which took care of me very well, but it's still a fact that I shouldn't have gotten the bad ram in the first place-
I have a feeling that if the test was 'more fair' as you call it and had something...easier(?) to diagnose, perhaps a bad power supply (the most often failure I see over here in Arizona), or perhaps dust clogged cpu fan, then most of the so called techs they hired still wouldn't have figured it out.
my only gripe is that crying over getting charged $35 for a $25 part is a bit extreme, I mean come on, a $10 markup ain't too bad considering that you didn't count shipping in "what you got it on the net" for.
Re:getting gouged by whom? (Score:3, Insightful)
Can I replace a water pump on one of these beauties in four hours? Sure. If everything goes right. But sometimes it doesn't. e.g. On our 98 Camry, you'd have to pull the crankshaft pulley. Possibly not a problem if you have a healthy impact wrench. But to reinstall it, you probably need to jam the flywheel with a screwdriver to keep the engine from rotating when you reach over at about half the torque the book calls for on the crankshaft pulley bolt. Jamming the flywheel calls for removing an exhaust system support bracket. But the bolts on that are surely going to be rusted into a lump that calls for nuclear weapons to get them loose.
Also, for most parts there are a lot of choices of manufacturer -- new vs rebuilt, etc. The mechanic will generally pick one that he can get delivered to him in a couple of hours and thinks will last beyond your mean time to blame mechanics. That will likely not be the (probably perfectly OK) $100 water pump you put in. And he will mark the price up some anyway. He is in business y'know.
Some amount of dealing with problems is probably built into that $768 -- which may well have included replacing the timing belt -- not the fan belt. (Timing belts are cheap and need to be replaced every 90K-140K miles-kilometers or so anyway). So I think that $768 isn't really a rip-off price. It's possibly a bit high -- depends on the local labor rates. As I understand it, the normal procedure is to look up the time for the repair in a book (or in the computer output from Alldata), maybe adjust it if the vehicle has obvious problems like lots of rusted bolts then multiply by the shop labor rate and add the marked up cost of the part.
If your car is rear wheel drive with a fore-aft mounted engine and an accessible water pump, then $768 probably is a rip-off. But I'm guessing that it isn't because replacing the water pump on one of those probably wouldn't have taken your sister's boyfriend four hours unless he drank both sixpacks before starting the job.
Re:getting gouged by whom? (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't repair computers for a living, but I'd say RAM failures are about the most common kind of hardware problem I've seen. Hard drive failures are possibly slightly more common, but the fact that the machine won't boot and plugging the drive into another machine still doesn't work makes them pretty trivial to diagnose.
Re:Who cares about haircuts? (Score:2, Insightful)
In the words of Stewie Griffin, "Wouldn't it be marvelous if I turned out to be a homosexual?"
Sorry (Score:2, Insightful)
What we do have is 1) the knowledge that it looks exactly like something produced today in Microsoft Word, and 2) typewriter experts who say that the only way this document could have been produced at the time was with an extremely expensive and rare typewriter with several custom modifications. It's entirely possible that such a typewriter did not exist, let alone happen to be in a Texas Air National Guard office.
Having to "prove" that it's a forgery is a pretty tall and unreasonable order. Dan Rather is supposed to be a journalist -- it's his job to prove his allegations are either true, or that it's highly likely they are true -- not the critic's job to prove it is absolutely false. Instead he presented it as fact when it's 99.999% certain that it's fake.
Re:Here, Here! (Score:3, Insightful)
Was that 100% of who they called, or 100% of who they showed?
Re:getting gouged by whom? (Score:3, Insightful)