Forensic Computer Targets Digital Crime 212
coondoggie writes "A European consortium has come up with a high-speed digital forensic computer dedicated to the task of quickly offloading and analyzing computer records. The TreCorder is a rugged forensic PC able to copy or clone up to three hard disks simultaneously, at a speed of up to 2 Gb/min., far faster than alternative equipment. The PC not only provides a complete mirror image of the hard disk and system memory — including deleted and reformatted data — but also eliminates any possibility of falsification in the process, meaning that the evidence it collects will stand up in court."
Re:how good is it? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:how good is it? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:how good is it? (Score:2, Insightful)
That said, the DoD standard for "wiping" a drive is also excessive in what it requires to declare the media clean. (All 0s, then all 1s, then 010101..., then all 0s again...blah blah blah)
My somewhat expert opinion is that a program that writes the drive to all 0s or all 1s is all you need.
-R
Re:how good is it? (Score:1, Insightful)
Reformat != Overwrite (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm thinking zero overwrites. From the article it appears that the system is a portable solution that only plugs into hard drives, and not a reader of the platters themselves. Software alone can analyze deleted files and a reformated file table, but it cannot use the orignal drive to read information that was overwritten.
doubtful (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:how good is it? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Drive density (Score:3, Insightful)
what makes you think they would want to do that? it'd be dog slow, and it'd also be error prone. none of which helps to sell drives.
Re:Anyone make a self distruct system for a PC? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:how good is it? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:how good is it? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Backup Device (Score:3, Insightful)
You can use dd and netcat, as another reply suggests, but I've done this many times, and I think it's much better (and easier) to recreate the file system, not least because this provides a really easy way to resize the disk in either direction. It's also faster (dead space is not copied) and defragments the file system too. You only have to use tools like dd, Ghost, PartImage or ntfsclone when the OS acts against easy cloning by having lots of special files that have to be at specific locations on disk. (Every version of Windows has this "feature".)
Re:Last you checked you were wrong (Score:3, Insightful)
Not to say you are wrong; I think you are overall right, in fact. But in an ideal world, a competent attorney can't have more than justice gives him (after all, if you can hope for a "competent defense attorney" you should expect for a "competent accusation attorney" too). It's true that telling one single bit to be a 0 or a 1 is "guessing", but a single bit doesn't tell anything. It's a hughe colletion of bits what holds info: if, by fair guessing any single bit to be a 0 or a 1 you end up with the literal text of the USA constitution, you must be pretty sure your guess is right (you can through some statistical analysis at it). If you guess a password and the password in fact gives you access to some protected data, you guess is OK. After all, even for the "true" data on a hard disk (the one coming from the last write), the reader just "guess" the bits on the platters to be 0s or 1s, why its "guess" is more "factical" than any other one you can through at it?
"However that isn't the kind of shit that flies in court"
On the contrary, my friend. There's nothing cualitatively different between this and DNA analysis, which is nothing more than statistics and guessing and you see it holds in court every day (for a very valid reason).
But, in the end, this completly goes out ot the article scope: the device is just a rugged PC that can extract low level data from the hard disks as fast as possible -by using the hard disk readers themselves, so its "sensibility" is just the one you get on "usual" read, so it's nothing more than a glorified dd.
Re:how good is it? (Score:3, Insightful)
But the magnetic landscabe is noisy and there is a smalles stable magnetic intensity. After one overwrite it is very likely that the residual magnetisation from the eralier data vanishes in the noise and is too small to be stable, at least fo current disks. Remember that the HDD manufacturers have benn storing very close to the material limits for some time now.