AACS Revision Cracked A Week Before Release 346
stevedcc writes "Ars Technica is running a story about next week's release of AACS, which is intended to fix the currently compromised version. The only problem is, the patched version has already been cracked. From the article: 'AACS LA's attempts to stifle dissemination of AACS keys and prevent hackers from compromising new keys are obviously meeting with extremely limited success. The hacker collective continues to adapt to AACS revisions and is demonstrating a capacity to assimilate new volume keys at a rate which truly reveals the futility of resistance. If keys can be compromised before HD DVDs bearing those keys are even released into the wild, one has to question the viability of the entire key revocation model.'"
waste of time (Score:5, Insightful)
It's okay... (Score:5, Insightful)
That's always the solution, isn't it?
(oy.)
It's always "Question This," "Challenge That" - (Score:5, Insightful)
Extremely Limited Success? (Score:5, Insightful)
Remember, kids: It's not torture, it's "enhanced interrogation techniques".
Re:waste of time (Score:5, Insightful)
DRM (Score:5, Insightful)
This is quickly making DRM look less like rights management and more like digital restrictions mockery. Of course, we knew this from the start. Any security strategy that depends on giving the attacker both the key and lock is doomed to fail.
The guys who make this DRM know its flawed but they still get paid when it fails. They must be quietly laughing all the way to the bank. Yet like morons the record labels keep handing money over. It's no wonder CD sales are declining when you're *that* clue-proof.
EMI has the right idea. Shock horror, if you give the customer what they want, they'll pay you for it. I never would have guessed!
Simon
Re:It's okay... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:DRM (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:waste of time (Score:2, Insightful)
The ever heard of cost vs benefit? (Score:5, Insightful)
ProfitA = $MEDIA_INCOME - DRM R&D - DRM content - lawsuits - alienated customers - recalls (i.e. rootkit)
ProfitB = $MEDIA_INCOME - piracy loss
I would bet that ProfitB is significantly larger then ProfitA.
Re:The ever heard of cost vs benefit? (Score:3, Insightful)
Problem with the people who enforce the DRM (Score:4, Insightful)
The AACS LA is really fighting a losing battle on this one. The question I have to ask is where and when are they going to cut their losses.
Re:waste of time (Score:5, Insightful)
"Don't watch pirated films - you'll lose the big screen image quality, and the incredible sound, and your view won't be spoiled by the person that goes to the toilet in front"
Whilst saying that last bit, they show a clip from a dodgy in-cinema cam job where somebody stands up in front of the camera.
What they fail to realise is that people do that in the cinema!
AACS is done (Score:5, Insightful)
Cost Functions (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:It's okay... (Score:5, Insightful)
The current downloading of copyrighted files is akin to drinking during prohibition. The laws were on the books making drinking (sharing copyrighted files) illegal. However, that didn't stop people from drinking, and in fact simply forced the alcohol industry underground, where it was taken over by organized crime. The temperance movement (RIAA / MPAA) did their best to keep the laws on the books forcing what they thought was a horrible thing to become illegal. However in doing this, they made criminals out of everyday folk who blatantly disregarded the less than sensible laws. Had anyone tried to enforce the, dare I say it, stupid laws in place, they would have ended up with millions behind bars.
My point is that attempting to create or uphold laws that no one respects is futile. They can't and won't be able to prosecute every uploader of files, and eventually, the laws on the books will match the reality of what goes on in day to day life.
Re:waste of time (Score:5, Insightful)
In my local cinema, the sound quality is pretty poor (stereo only on most screens, and some muppet has done strange things to the equaliser that heavily emphasise the bass), and the image is slightly blurred and full of little flickers where dust has got into the film.
A DVD and a home projector and surround sound system give much better video and audio quality, don't have adverts, and can be paused when you want to get up and go to the toilet in the middle. For the price of two of you going to the cinema, you can buy a DVD and renting is even cheaper.
The only still-extant reason for downloading is that it takes so long for films to get from the cinema to DVD. If they did simultaneous releases, then I would expect to see piracy fall a lot. Mind you, I'd also expect to see most cinemas go out of business...
Re:waste of time (Score:2, Insightful)
There's very little reason to go to the cinema anymore- it's not a group experience like it once was, you don't talk with people afterwards, in fact if you're lucky you only have to ask someone to shut up once. Home stereos can sound pretty great, and don't cost as much as they once did and even projectors are somewhat affordable, with big screen TV's being pretty great too.
There's very little reason not to watch on dvd, and the only reasons not to download is to support the people/companies involved if you like it or to avoid going to jail.
I have a huge collection of purchased dvds, so don't go pointing fingers at me, but I do have strong opinions about downloading.
Umm... (Score:5, Insightful)
A more proactive approach to curbing piracy would not restrict the rights of the consumer, but expand them. Instead of pouring millions of dollars into encryption schemes that are cracked before they're released, invest that money into innovations like exclusive or pre-release content for paying customers. I might feel better about buying an album online if a) I knew I could use that album any way I want and b) got a little extra in return, like an interview with the band, an exclusive track, preferential treatment for concert tickets, or whatever. I know these exclusive tracks and interviews could just as easily be pirated, but it's the thought that counts. If you (the RIAA/MPAA) respect my right and desire to use my movies and music how I want, I'll be more likely to respect your right to compensation for said goods. Either way, putting digital handcuffs on your paying customers is definitely *not* the right approach.
Re:Does anybody else... (Score:2, Insightful)
utter fuckpuppets (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Does anybody else... (Score:5, Insightful)
Or more succinctly.... (Score:5, Insightful)
But I liked your analogy too.
Re:More laws: coming right up... (Score:1, Insightful)
If people recklessly causing or attempting to cause death can't already be imprisoned for life in your country then you've got bigger problems than copyright infringement. Put in place normal laws against manslaughter and attempted murder now. Worry about copyright infringement later. Seriously.
Re:It's okay... (Score:5, Insightful)
There is a lot of reason to copy a $20 movie ($35... $70 in some cases). There is absolutely no reason to copy a $5.50 movie.
The movie company makes a lot less profit- but they still make a profit and anyone who pirates their movie is so clearly desperate for cash that the movie company isn't losing a dime on them.
Re:Umm... (Score:2, Insightful)
at a reasonable price and you'll have a lifelong customer. Let me decide if I want to move those types of media to a new type in a few years as you are going to continually move forward. I should be able to as well without repurchasing everything again.
I know what i want makes too much sense and is a pipe dream but we can all wish.
Re:It's okay... (Score:5, Insightful)
Look back to prohibition times and see just how violent they were.
Re:waste of time (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:DRM (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Extremely Limited Success? (Score:5, Insightful)
Unobtainium should be free (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:waste of time (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:It's okay... (Score:5, Insightful)
Why do people still make their own furniture with woodworking tools instead of just buying furniture from K-mart?
Why do people build their own computers from components, instead of just buying a computer from Dell?
Why do people install their own tile instead of just hiring a contractor?
Why do people write their own software instead of just buying it from Microsoft, or hiring a consultant to do it for them?
Why do people brew their own beer, instead of just buying a Coor's? (Moreover, why is this legal and distilling your own whiskey illegal?)
If a country values freedom, it shouldn't restrict what people do in their own homes as long as non-consenting people aren't affected.
Re:waste of time (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:It's okay... (Score:5, Insightful)
Like those arrested for possessing cannabis?
Re:waste of time (Score:4, Insightful)
These ads do not work as intended.
Re:It's okay... (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, no. Stealing a drink off the keg means one less drink in the keg. Not the case with duplication. You fail.
Re:waste of time (Score:3, Insightful)
I have no problem watching movies months after release. I'm not sure why it's so hard to avoid spoilers. Hell, I look up on usenet at hit movies that were released in the last year or two and the titles aren't even familiar, I have to go to IMDB to see what the heck they're about. I certainly don't know what happened in them.
Re:AACS is done (Score:3, Insightful)
And yes, if I had $50000 to spare, I would buy an SEM in a heartbeat to smite them. Well, that and SEMs being incredibly awesome.