Click Here To Infect Your PC! 215
Email me for FREE viruses writes "Just how many people would click an ad saying "Is your PC virus-free? Get it infected here!"? According to the security researcher who ran that very ad on Google for 6 months, 0.16% (409 of 259,723) would click on it. 98% of those people were running Windows. The Google Adwords campaign cost $23 in total, which works out to $0.06 per infection had the site actually been malicious."
0,16% (Score:5, Insightful)
Hmmm (Score:5, Insightful)
Not exactly. (Score:5, Insightful)
Not exactly.
$0.06 per infection attempt, which is obviously not the same thing.
Re:0,16% Mac/Linux users (Score:4, Insightful)
Doesn't really mean much (Score:5, Insightful)
Why does it matter what OS they were using? (Score:5, Insightful)
You can't write code or design software that will secure "stupid." Firefox and Linux are certainly easier to secure, and they have a better security model, but they aren't idiot proof.
If those folks were using an abacus, they'd probably get their head stuck in it! <G>
--
Toro
Idiots ? (Score:2, Insightful)
I would say that people clicking "Click here to check if your PC is virus-free !" are more stupid.
Personally, I wouldn't have clicked the "get infected", but I understand curious people who would because they are confident in their protection and this is kind of joke. When I see "Get your PC infected !", I think "no way, nobody can want this, must be a joke or something".
Of course, being confident in one's protection and using Windows IS stupid...
Re:statistics (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Browser stats (Score:3, Insightful)
--
Toro
Re:Hmmm (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:It's hardly a surprise (Score:5, Insightful)
Worst-case for a virus-infected windows-machine ? Complete reinstallation. A day lost, hell make it "toss away $1000 machine".
Worst-case for std ? Death.
Not really comparable.
Re:Oh dear. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:0,16% Mac/Linux users (Score:4, Insightful)
<user> I have Norton. My computer is now immune to all viruses.
(one week later)
<user> I have a virus, can you fix it?
I've seen people many times think that because they had Norton or McAfee, that they could do whatever they want without having to worry about getting a virus and act reckless. Open every attachment they get in email, downloading and running random
Re:0,16% (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:0,16% Mac/Linux users (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:It's hardly a surprise (Score:3, Insightful)
it is possible that this would be worse than death for some (unlikely, but possible)
Re:Browser stats (Score:4, Insightful)
There's such a huge jump in logic there that it just befuddles me that 'configuring properly' is required to use the internet.
No computer/browser is perfect, but it just makes basic sense to use a computer/browser that starts at a very secure state and allows you to open it up if you want/need. Rather than the other way around.
<bad car analogy> It's like having to put rear view mirrors on your car after you buy it. </bad car analogy>
Re:Attempted Infection == Infection (Score:5, Insightful)
And then, if and only if it looks safe, you can use wget http://somesite.someisp.cc/some/long/filename.ext [someisp.cc] to download it for investigation.
Bogus because it's flawed (Score:2, Insightful)
Example:
Joe runs a website. Joe decides he wants some income for his website and signs up for Google Adsense which displays contextual Google ads on his website. Google gives Joe a percentage of the revenue (30-40%?!-google doesn't tell exactly how much.) Joe decides to get some of his friends to click on his ads to boost his monthly revenue. Joe makes more money, and the ad gets more clicks. Advertisers have no idea that Joe is falsely generating clicks and will happily pay Google for the clicks, which in turn Google pays Joe his dividends as well.
Now if the tester turned off the ability to have his ads displayed on 3rd party websites, then the test would carry a bit more ground.
I'm not saying people aren't dumb enough to click on the ad, I'm just bringing up a valid point that exists in web advertising everywhere, especially Google (even they will tell you that their fraud systems will catch the persons 100% of the time - lol)
h
Automobile (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Goatse! (Score:3, Insightful)
Anonymous cowards don't need karma, and first posts don't need high visibility. I see it more as a mod point that got wasted for no good reason than an opportunity to reward someone for posting goatse.