Jail for Selling Email Lists to Spammers 172
amigoro writes "UK will start jailing the people who trade in email addresses, or any other personal data. The current Data Protection Act only fines people who do that, but the money one can make from trading in personal information was far higher than the measly GBP 5000 one had to pay if caught. The new regulations will result in a two year prison sentence for violating the Act."
Yep (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:US (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Jail Time (Score:4, Interesting)
And how many years can it take to recover from having your credit history trashed, from losing your sensitive job because you appear to be financially wreckless or in debt, or from having to rebuild your reputation when someone sends around child pr0n links/content or stock-pumping scams that appear to be coming from you?
If you performed a "violent crime" that resulted in more or less the same consequences (wrecking someone's house or career), that's somehow worse, for you, than some other action that results in the same thing, long-term? How about when the person doing it is doing it to thousands of people at the same time?
spending it in jail doesn't help society very much
Other than the whole "he can't do any more of it while he's in prison" aspect, right?
maybe your email address along with your crime made publicly known
Oh no! Not public disclosure of your e-mail address! That's really some pretty serious stuff you're talking, there. No one who steals information, spreads around fraudulant messages, and is willing to take YOUR money or credibility for their own use would ever... just change e-mail addresses. These people are beyond shame. Naming them publicly does nothing, but jail time completely prevents them from any of these activities while they're locked up.
Regardless, I still think we are too quick to just throw people in jail and forget about them.
Forget about them? We have to feed them, provide medical and legal care, and 24 months later (in the example cited), administer their release. I can't imagine that you're thinking someone doing a 24-month stint is somehow going to wind up there for years longer because someone forgot that their sentence was up. Please.
It sounds more like what you're really lobbying for is harsher sentences for violent criminals. Because you can't truly be thinking that life-wrecking scam artists that cost the world's economy untold billions in (choose your currency) and irretrievably lost time are the same as someone didn't renew their dog license, or was caught distilling their own grappa in the basement.
Re:THE FALCONER! (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:What about people who inadvertantly give away (Score:3, Interesting)
This, like a parking ticket, isn't a felony crime that might stop you from getting a job.
What it could do is make people think about getting some education about their PCs, or at least get someone who can maintain them properly like a decent mechanic would their car.
A major portion of the spam problem is people who allow this kind of thing to happen. You're right in the sense that we shouldn't be going after the small, petty guys alone. I still think the spammers themselves are a bigger target. But if we can take away a major source of their information, we can make their spamming job a lot harder.
As a side benefit, people would be exposed to all sorts of things, like Firefox, Linux, and other alternatives to a system that is inherently insecure.
"MacroShaft - Where do you want to get screwed today?"
Re:FROSTY PISTOLIERS! (Score:2, Interesting)