Vista Exploit Surfaces on Russian Hacker Site 103
Datamation writes "Exploit code for Windows Vista (though at this point only proof-of-concept code) has been published to a Russian hacker site, Eweek reports. Certain strings sent through the 'MessageBox' API apparently cause memory corruption. Though this is obviously cause for concern, at the moment it would seem access to the system would already be required to make use of the exploit. Determina has an analysis of the bug. Just last week, Trend Micro reported that Vista zero-days are being sold at underground hacker sites for $50,000."
curious (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm just wondering who would buy these at such a price. What is the real value of an exploit?
Re:curious (Score:3, Insightful)
Someone with $50,000 to spend as an investment, who expects to make more money out of it.
What is the real value of an exploit?
$50,000.
Re:Meant to say this last week.. but.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Maybe the biggest customer for these zero-day exploits should be.. Microsoft?
$50,000 isn't that much compared to the other option IMHO.
Just a thought.
It's a very valid thought, it's just the form that's bad: what you suggest is Microsoft pays black hats under the table to fix find flaws in their products for them. Quite a PR disaster, surely you'll agree. On the other hand, if they were smart, they would hire talented hackers *upstream*, i.e. during the development process, and offer them the same insane amounts of money on a per-exploit-found basis (at "black market rate" if you will), only these hackers would be working for MS perfectly legally: they would get the same money, trouble-free, and Microsoft could boast they subject their products to the most stringent tests before release.
Heck, MS could even offer these russians H1Bs/green cards, housing in the US, car and whatnot, that would be small change compared to how Microsoft stands to make out like a bandit on the semi-forced sale of their new OS...
Re:curious (Score:3, Insightful)
People who want to make Vista zombie bots.
And who would want to do that?
Spammers
Re:Fscking Visual Basic (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:curious (Score:5, Insightful)
The only thing they ruin is the term "hacker". But that's okay, this word has been deformed, mis- and overused for so long to mean "pirate" and "cracker" by stupid media people that it just doesn't matter anymore.
In reality, these guys aren't even worthy of the term "crackers" (which itself isn't worth much in the first place): they're just mafia, conmen, blackmail artists, forgers, thieves, robbers... whatever you choose to call it. They just happen to use a computer instead of a tommy gun, but the result is the same.
Re:Fscking Visual Basic (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Meant to say this last week.. but.. (Score:2, Insightful)
And a place in jail for violating DMCA.
Why now? (Score:3, Insightful)
A smart black hat would lay low until SP1 is released, and wait for the real corporate deployment to begin.
Doesn't count! (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm pretty sure the Slashdot community wouldn't be so two-faced as to claim something is an exploit on Vista which isn't 'counted' as an exploit on OS X, right?
Right?
Can this be exploited with alert() or prompt()? (Score:2, Insightful)